This is what you said:
“51.2 final 400.
25.3 final 200.
12.2 final 100.
Three things Hocker has NEVER DONE.”
When someone correctly pointed out that Hocker has done two of those things (25.3 or faster last 200 and 12.2 or faster last 100 to close a race) to finish a race, you responded with “Sure, but…”
So you acknowledged you were incorrect with the word “Sure” but you didn’t really take ownership of your falsehood. You could have said Hocker has never done the combination of 12.2, 25.3, and 51.2 — that would have been accurate. Instead, you listed 12.2, 25.3, and 51,2 as individual splits and then treated them individually by saying they are “three things Hocker has never done”. That is verifiably false. Got it?
