A historic day for transwomen - May 31, 2025 - Biological males win state titles in CA, Oregon and Washington all on same day

Sure, keep calling the people you're trying to convince to come to the other side "racist." Good luck with that. It's been working out great for the past 10 years.

Well, 350,000,000 people in the country. Maybe 1,000 people are talking or writing about this. (1,000/350,000,000)x100=0.0002857%. Why worry about what a such a small percentage of the population says?

You mean, like calling the other side "misogynist" has worked quite well for TERFs?

You nutcases can’t actually defend your misogyny and mental illness so you try to twist things and hide behind race. Such cowardice is to be expected, so you’re par for the course. Does the Defence Force pay you enough? lol

Has Trump truthed about this story and defunded those three states? If not, why not?

Bro... or sis... or "they" just set an acceptable tolerance all on "it's" own that they think we should accept. Ree. Tar. Did. Protect our daughters. Friggin' buffoonery.

ONE BOY in girls' sports is too many. EVEN IF HE FINISHES IN LAST PLACE.

Gun violence should get more attention. That being said, I don't follow the 1% argument or the argument by others that well there are plenty of trans athletes in the middle of the pack. Sure, there are plenty of girls faster than boys on any high school cross country team. That doesn't mean we get rid of boys and girls divisions. It's the whole Emperor's New Clothes absurdity of the logic that people relate to on this issue. 1% of champions would be a much bigger impact than you'd think. We're telling a whole population (genetic females) that they aren't important in athletic competition and identity rules the day in a setting where divisions exist because of biology. It's asinine.

Unless it's a physical sport, I don't know why people give a s***t. It's sad athletics is getting dragged into gender wars. Also, who cares about the high jump - no one is watching it!
Athletics is, sadly, a terrible product. There are a handful of athletes that have some personality that connects with the public (e.g., Noah Lyles, Sydney Mclaughlin). However, for the vast majority of athletes, we have no affinity or care for them. It's not that interesting to see, almost certainly PED-enhanced individuals, complete a handful of times a year. If some trans people are flailing around at lower levels, who cares!

It's so sad to se 50 plus year olds like Rojo and all the old adults on the MB picking on 15 and 16 year old children. Before the tragedy of Emmett Till, I wonder what adults of that era felt about those children who were different from them.

One of these days one of these kids will be hurt by some old adult and I'm sure the right wing fanatics here will be as happy as those adults were at what they did to Emmett Till!

But this is the world we live in!

lets do a little math, there are 50 states and 24 states than ban trans girls from competing in girls sports Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming.

So trans kids can compete in 26 states plus DC. In track there are usually 15 events. That's 15 times 26 is 390 events. Not counting DC. Out of 390, trans kids won 3.

Oh boy Rojo, I can surely see the domination and threats to girls sports that you and your far right sycophants are yelling about on the MB's. LMAO!

You and your peeps are as dopy as those who were yelling about trans kids in college sports, there are 230,000 girls that were competing in NCAA sports and 10 trans kids or yelling about trans kids in high school sports were there are just a handful vs. 3.4 million girls competing.

It turns out that the MB are just an outlet for propaganda and extremism when it comes to this issue, similar to what may be seen in the Daily Caller, The American Conservative, The Daily Wire, Townhall, The Blaze, One America News Network (OAN), The National Review, and WorldNetDaily.

It's sad the the creators of this site are turning it into a outlet for hate speech, from what it used to be.

But they are big and very proud trump guys, so there you go :)

You left out a couple of names from your list of US states that now have laws or policies which bar males from competing in girls' school sports. Georgia, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia now belong on the list too.

Also, contrary to the view that the laws and policies in these states are about where "trans kids can compete," the truth is that most of them do not apply to "trans kids" collectively. Most of the laws or policies in these states solely bar male students from competing in girls' sports. So-called "trans kids" who are female are still free to compete in girls' sports - provided, that is, that they're not taking testosterone or other PEDs.

Moreover, the state laws and policies in place to "protect girls/women's sports" don't single out male students with trans or other special gender identities and subject them to different and stricter standards than other male students. The laws and policies treat all male students the same by barring all males from girls' school sports on account of their sex. In fact, the majority of the state laws and policies that I've read which prohibit males from joining girls' teams and from competing in girls' interscholastic sports do not even mention "trans" or "gender identity."

As for your view that everyone who opposes males competing in girls/women's school sports and who cares enough about this issue to speak out about it are on the far right - and we get our information and take our cues from the media outlets you listed - you're sorely mistaken about that too.

But what about 2021 when about 1% of people with the rona would die from it so we made everybody get vaccinated? Anyway your math neglects the fact that most states have multiple divisions, so in reality your argument becomes about 4-6x stronger when you figure that part in. I still side with runnermom.

Whoops, i meant “i still side with runragged” not “i still side with runnermom.”

Why would that be? If they're prescribed testosterone as medication by a doctor then why should that bar them from sports?

This is fake propaganda post. This issue is not a reason to stop being a Democrat. Many Democrats disagree about this issue, (on principle, I don't think they should compete for the same medals as non-trans people) but they are generally united that trans identifying people don't deserve to be threatened or abused.

We are losing our basic rights. Wake tf up.

Trump does not have a unilateral right to defund states. It would take congressional approval and there’s no way he’s getting it.

Try and stop him.

The federal government does have the power to withhold funding for states that do not comply with the rules/procedures attached to those funding streams. This is actually one of the most common ways the federal government exercises power over states. Trump doesn't have to do anything special to exercise this power; it already exists.

What we may see happening down the line is Supreme Court involvement, which would clarify interpretations of longstanding policies. For example, there has been a lot of back and forth around Title IX. The Biden administration had a proposal to interpret the policy based on gender identity. The Trump administration rolled that back and said that the policy is about sex, not gender. If the Supreme Court ruled on this, it would limit creative interpretations with each administration, but it would not change the fact that the federal government could restrict funding to states that don't comply.

This means that individual states can thumb their noses at the federal government, but they have to be prepared to lose federal money in the process. The same is true of universities like Harvard. If they want their students to be eligible for student loans, have the ability to bring in international students, and maintain other sources of federal funding (research grants, etc.), they are obligated to comply with the rules attached to the money.