I dont have any relationship with Khamis. He is just another forum member except with elektromagnetic ingenuity. I respect physicists and take their Interpretation on anything over another professional.
i just wanted to remind you that the future concrete model of truth will be based on AI which will still form a subjective opinion on what the truth is. And that is just what Khamis has been doing all along. Khamis is far ahead of his time and a better bet for American presidency than even trump
your model of truth dont work no more. its no longer about falsifiability but about prospectivity!! Its the world of bots!! You simply won’t know how robots will act until it acts. That’s almost divine like space-time!
Does he have "elektromagnetic(sic) ingenuity"? Is he a "physicist"? What is the link to running? Does he know anything about elite distance running performance?
And I just want to remind you, I'll be happy when the future divine AI can start answering some of my questions. It will be a big improvement. I will not leave the forum, but be encouraged to stay longer.
I dont have any relationship with Khamis. He is just another forum member except with elektromagnetic ingenuity. I respect physicists and take their Interpretation on anything over another professional.
i just wanted to remind you that the future concrete model of truth will be based on AI which will still form a subjective opinion on what the truth is. And that is just what Khamis has been doing all along. Khamis is far ahead of his time and a better bet for American presidency than even trump
your model of truth dont work no more. its no longer about falsifiability but about prospectivity!! Its the world of bots!! You simply won’t know how robots will act until it acts. That’s almost divine like space-time!
Does he have "elektromagnetic(sic) ingenuity"? Is he a "physicist"? What is the link to running? Does he know anything about elite distance running performance?
And I just want to remind you, I'll be happy when the future divine AI can start answering some of my questions. It will be a big improvement. I will not leave the forum, but be encouraged to stay longer.
Maybe you should ask yourself what is the link to running since you have the ability to find all links to not doping.
I don’t know for sure he is what he says but I know I live in a world where Trump says he is what he is what he is gonna do as President in 2025 and for many reasons faithfully applied I believe him and can see already the immediate effects taking place to that end.
To that end I don’t find my belief in Khamis words anymore perplexing or astounding than for Trump’s words. The correct question to then ask is
WHY NOT?? Why not electromagnetic ingenuity and why not link it to running?
maybe for you you can face up to the issue and ask why not doping.
This post was edited 48 seconds after it was posted.
Maybe you should ask yourself what is the link to running since you have the ability to find all links to not doping.
I don’t know for sure he is what he says but I know I live in a world where Trump says he is what he is what he is gonna do as President in 2025 and for many reasons faithfully applied I believe him and can see already the immediate effects taking place to that end.
To that end I don’t find my belief in Khamis words anymore perplexing or astounding than for Trump’s words. The correct question to then ask is
WHY NOT?? Why not electromagnetic ingenuity and why not link it to running?
maybe for you you can face up to the issue and ask why not doping.
Ask myself? I thought I was asking the divine AI to falsify me.
Maybe you should ask yourself what is the link to running since you have the ability to find all links to not doping.
I don’t know for sure he is what he says but I know I live in a world where Trump says he is what he is what he is gonna do as President in 2025 and for many reasons faithfully applied I believe him and can see already the immediate effects taking place to that end.
To that end I don’t find my belief in Khamis words anymore perplexing or astounding than for Trump’s words. The correct question to then ask is
WHY NOT?? Why not electromagnetic ingenuity and why not link it to running?
maybe for you you can face up to the issue and ask why not doping.
Ask myself? I thought I was asking the divine AI to falsify me.
It’s in the making. Nobody has yet created an AI bot for distance sport. You will have to wait to be falsified but it doesn’t mean all this waiting lets you temporarily escape falsification. It simply means I will also temporarily take the place of the AI bot and think and act the way it probably would and bring judgment on your opinions
This post was edited 46 seconds after it was posted.
Ask myself? I thought I was asking the divine AI to falsify me.
It’s in the making. Nobody has yet created an AI bot for distance sport. You will have to wait to be falsified but it doesn’t mean all this waiting lets you temporarily escape falsification. It simply means I will also temporarily take the place of the AI bot and think and act the way it probably would and bring judgment on your opinions
Though they speak with obtuse and metaphysical words, both Khamis and the aptly named King of Physics are correct in their musings.
I can categorixally state that the legend El G was 100% clean, with a pure and natural upbringing in Berkane, Morocco that beneditted from zero elektromagnetic interference.
The Rekrunner with his scientific illiteracy is not the man to pronounce on who is clean and who is dirty.
As late as 2005 THERE WERE NO MOBILE PHONES IN THE VIRGIN LAND OF MOROCCO TO CAUSE ELEKTROMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES IN THE HUMAN CAPILLIRIES!!
Furthermore in Morocco to this day only the rich can afford microwave OVENS THUS SPARING THE INNOCENT POPULACE OF ELEKTROMAGNETIC FIELD DISTURBANCE IN THE PULMONARY SYSTEM!!!
Rekrunner cannot see that El G's upbringing was completely unlike an athlete such as Jakob, and that he had no need for drugs.
Though they speak with obtuse and metaphysical words, both Khamis and the aptly named King of Physics are correct in their musings.
I can categorixally state that the legend El G was 100% clean, with a pure and natural upbringing in Berkane, Morocco that beneditted from zero elektromagnetic interference.
The Rekrunner with his scientific illiteracy is not the man to pronounce on who is clean and who is dirty.
No one is the man to pronounce who is clean and who is dirty. There is always a chance that any athlete is dirty.
As late as 2005 THERE WERE NO MOBILE PHONES IN THE VIRGIN LAND OF MOROCCO TO CAUSE ELEKTROMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES IN THE HUMAN CAPILLIRIES!!
Furthermore in Morocco to this day only the rich can afford microwave OVENS THUS SPARING THE INNOCENT POPULACE OF ELEKTROMAGNETIC FIELD DISTURBANCE IN THE PULMONARY SYSTEM!!!
Rekrunner cannot see that El G's upbringing was completely unlike an athlete such as Jakob, and that he had no need for drugs.
Mobile phones entered the country in 1997. In 2000, Morocco had 2.55 million mobile phone subscribers. In 2006, 16 million. In 2007, around 20.5 million, or two-thirds of the population.
I can't see that any healthy athlete has any need for drugs.
No one is the man to pronounce who is clean and who is dirty. There is always a chance that any athlete is dirty.
You don't seem to grasp the concept of reasonable belief, or how science operates. There is no proof that the sun wil rise in the morning tomorrow. There is no proof that you are not a brain in a vat. There is plenty of proof that EPO works, but even if there wasn't, it would still be overwhelmingly rational to belive it does based on what we know of how it works and relating that to knowledge we have of the physiology of running performance, as well as the hundreds of anecodotal reports and performances of runners who have used EPO, including such glaringly obvious facts such as world records set during the 'EPO era' that were not beaten for decades, or have still not been beaten.
Similarly with suspicion on whether an individual athlete is clean or dirty, some athletes are clearly more suspicious than others, even without 'proof'. Katir was more suspicious than any other elite 1500m runner, given his sudden improvement, his Spanish-Moroccan background, his coach with no proven experience, his manager who had defended dopers and also managed Cacho and other suspicious or confirmed dopers. Likewise, his subsequent wheareabouts suspension justifies the belief that he was indeed doping, even if it is only proof of an anti-doping offence, rather than doping itself.
You don't seem to grasp the concept of reasonable belief, or how science operates. There is no proof that the sun wil rise in the morning tomorrow. There is no proof that you are not a brain in a vat. There is plenty of proof that EPO works, but even if there wasn't, it would still be overwhelmingly rational to belive it does based on what we know of how it works and relating that to knowledge we have of the physiology of running performance, as well as the hundreds of anecodotal reports and performances of runners who have used EPO, including such glaringly obvious facts such as world records set during the 'EPO era' that were not beaten for decades, or have still not been beaten.
Similarly with suspicion on whether an individual athlete is clean or dirty, some athletes are clearly more suspicious than others, even without 'proof'. Katir was more suspicious than any other elite 1500m runner, given his sudden improvement, his Spanish-Moroccan background, his coach with no proven experience, his manager who had defended dopers and also managed Cacho and other suspicious or confirmed dopers. Likewise, his subsequent wheareabouts suspension justifies the belief that he was indeed doping, even if it is only proof of an anti-doping offence, rather than doping itself.
Just the same, I do not pronounce who is clean and who is dirty.
There is always a chance that any athlete is dirty.
There is a chance that Katir is dirty. There is a chance that "EPO works".
Aren't you too old to call googling *research*, having been in college in 1983?
Nmd I found it, and was correct. Only you called it "software engineer by education and trade", not software developer...
I'm sure you'll give me a long speech now about the (made up and irrelevant) difference between a software engineer and a software developer. Knock yourself out!
Though they speak with obtuse and metaphysical words, both Khamis and the aptly named King of Physics are correct in their musings.
I can categorixally state that the legend El G was 100% clean, with a pure and natural upbringing in Berkane, Morocco that beneditted from zero elektromagnetic interference.
The Rekrunner with his scientific illiteracy is not the man to pronounce on who is clean and who is dirty.
Thanks for sounding like the descendent of the great physicist Nikola Tesla the Croatian! For a moment I thought he had a son named Thomas!
yes most ignorant comments on this forum about El G fail to take into account first of all the elektramagnetica field exposure of his upbringing and training environment before imputing drugs.
El G was known to write love letters to mama and papa hundred of kilometers away from Ifrane because he had no phone. Adil Kaouch did the same as did all his training partners. When phones starts to enter the picture was when EL G got down with asthma and bronchitis and that was 2004. You can be sure phones entered into El G life and training environment then. He used all remaining energy in him to win Olympic golds in 2004 but that left him irreversibly ill and weakened from 2005 onwards and be retired. Adil Kaouch experienced the same weakening but because he opted to continue racing he decided to cheat and the story goes….
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.