Danny Masterson sentenced to 30 years to life

help me unkle or pipps wrote:

Can someone please explain a few things to me?

* Who is behind the conspiracy to get him convicted?

* If there was "no evidence" - how did all the members of the jury vote to convict?

* How did the judge even let it go to jury? Wouldn't the defense team have requested a dismissal given the lack of evidence? I've watched many law and order episodes, so I believe this can happen.

* What larger plot is this whole conspiracy part of? There has to be more to it then sending some random guy no one has heard of to jail for 30 years

THANKS!

help me unkle or pipps wrote:

Can someone please explain a few things to me?

* Who is behind the conspiracy to get him convicted?

* If there was "no evidence" - how did all the members of the jury vote to convict?

* How did the judge even let it go to jury? Wouldn't the defense team have requested a dismissal given the lack of evidence? I've watched many law and order episodes, so I believe this can happen.

* What larger plot is this whole conspiracy part of? There has to be more to it then sending some random guy no one has heard of to jail for 30 years

THANKS!

Everything Everywhere Is Russia wrote:

help me unkle or pipps wrote:

Can someone please explain a few things to me?

* Who is behind the conspiracy to get him convicted?

* If there was "no evidence" - how did all the members of the jury vote to convict?

* How did the judge even let it go to jury? Wouldn't the defense team have requested a dismissal given the lack of evidence? I've watched many law and order episodes, so I believe this can happen.

* What larger plot is this whole conspiracy part of? There has to be more to it then sending some random guy no one has heard of to jail for 30 years

THANKS!

Are you sure this is a standard you'd like to adhere to?

Everything Everywhere Is Russia wrote:

help me unkle or pipps wrote:

Can someone please explain a few things to me?

* Who is behind the conspiracy to get him convicted?

* If there was "no evidence" - how did all the members of the jury vote to convict?

* How did the judge even let it go to jury? Wouldn't the defense team have requested a dismissal given the lack of evidence? I've watched many law and order episodes, so I believe this can happen.

* What larger plot is this whole conspiracy part of? There has to be more to it then sending some random guy no one has heard of to jail for 30 years

THANKS!

Are you sure this is a standard you'd like to adhere to?

Masterson lawyers wrote:

Everything Everywhere Is Russia wrote:

Are you sure this is a standard you'd like to adhere to?

Im sure the jury instructions were:
"In this specific case, evidence doesn't matter, just do the wokest thing possible"

That's how stupid you sound.

pipppi p wrote:

We are woke now. Believe every rape allegation even without evidence. Wokeism has permeated the courtroom.

Testimony enjoyer wrote:

Shocking LRC seems to be PRO SEX CRIME in this case

Masterson of my domain wrote:

pipppi p wrote:

We are woke now. Believe every rape allegation even without evidence. Wokeism has permeated the courtroom.

Somehow I navigate day-to-day life without crippling fear that I’ll be unjustly convicted of rape, despite my active sex life. This must shock you given your wokeness fears.

letsincel.com wrote:

You're forgetting this forum in full of incels, meaning they always side with the rapist.

Throwthebook wrote:

Masterson of my domain wrote:

Somehow I navigate day-to-day life without crippling fear that I’ll be unjustly convicted of rape, despite my active sex life. This must shock you given your wokeness fears.

You probably should worry a little. One lady decides you did her wrong…

being able to determine wrote:

And with looters, illegal immigrants, arsonists, etc..