3. Obstruction or attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
4. Conspiracy against rights
I wasn't old enough to vote for or against him so I say this as someone who is just watching from the sidelines, but these all sound way too vague to take seriously. Bottom line is he has free speech rights to claim he won the election regardless of what the correct vote count is.
I'm not from the US, but it seems increasingly to be a country similar to Turkey or Russia where the political opposition use criminal law as a tool to get into power, or to deter applicants standing for the opposition. Isn't Clinton supposed to have done far worse? Is Obama squeaky clean? How about the people behind Biden?
I agree with you that these charges are worryingly vague and all encompassing. I would expect to see charges much more specifically created as offences in a first world country. The nature of those charges mean that they are open to abuse by political opponents.
Criminal charges against D.J.T. read serious but law makers write all charges to read serious. Spitting on sidewalk can be read as a serious charge.
* Many or all presidents take documents. How else do you believe they have material for their post-president library.
* Many former government employees take documents.
* I see nothing serious. Where are the names of C.I.A. &/or O.N.I. employees and human assets?
* Where are illegal weapon and munition transactions?
* I don't see any evidence of selling specs for most modern weapon systems.
So many former presidents engage in graft and corruption. Interesting how B.H.O. was near broke 15 or 16 years ago but he has 70 million dollars now from a $400,000/yr. job. W. Clinton sure got rich after he left office. Could it be D.J.T. would have told Jackie Speier and the rest of warmongers in d.n.c. no to ukraine conflict?
So many former presidents engage in graft and corruption. Interesting how B.H.O. was near broke 15 or 16 years ago but he has 70 million dollars now from a $400,000/yr. job. W. Clinton sure got rich after he left office.
That’s because, as literate people who are respected around the world, Clinton and Obama write books and give speaking engagements that they are paid insanely well for. DJT probably couldn’t cobble together a coloring book, and the only people who would pay him to speak are like H*tler youth conferences or whatever.
I'm tired of the constitution. First we're told Trump has to hand power to the Democrats because it's in the constitution now we're seeing the laws of this country weaponized against him too.
We have to decide if we want to be a country under a constitution or under an all powerful Trump presidency from 2024 onwards, I know which one I want to see.
I'm tired of the constitution. First we're told Trump has to hand power to the Democrats because it's in the constitution now we're seeing the laws of this country weaponized against him too.
We have to decide if we want to be a country under a constitution or under an all powerful Trump presidency from 2024 onwards, I know which one I want to see.
^^ will the extremists see the sarcasm? "The founding farthers would have wanted Trump to be our King."
And that’s the problem. Imagine that these exact indictments were handed down, with the only difference that the defendant’s name was Biden instead of Trump. You would scream “lock him up” as loud as you could. That you lack the objectivity to do the same for DJT just clarified that you are in a cult, no different from Jim Jones. Well, one small difference…. Trump charges for the Kool-Aid.
So many former presidents engage in graft and corruption. Interesting how B.H.O. was near broke 15 or 16 years ago but he has 70 million dollars now from a $400,000/yr. job. W. Clinton sure got rich after he left office.
That’s because, as literate people who are respected around the world, Clinton and Obama write books and give speaking engagements that they are paid insanely well for. DJT probably couldn’t cobble together a coloring book, and the only people who would pay him to speak are like H*tler youth conferences or whatever.
Really? The general public shells out $500k to hear Obama speak? Or is it his bosses on Wall Street paying him off?
That is exactly the point - number 1 it is an indictment and not a conviction. Number 2 - the collusion in the 2016 and 2020 elections on the part of this administration should have some indictments coming IF there were equal justice which there is not. If there are not changes and more equality in how things are done there WILL be problems. You can stick your head in the sand because you’re ok with the candidate this is being done to but I can assure you this won’t end well.
That’s because, as literate people who are respected around the world, Clinton and Obama write books and give speaking engagements that they are paid insanely well for. DJT probably couldn’t cobble together a coloring book, and the only people who would pay him to speak are like H*tler youth conferences or whatever.
Really? The general public shells out $500k to hear Obama speak? Or is it his bosses on Wall Street paying him off?
The general public shelled out 65 million for his memoir, so……
Dog and pony show for the dumb left continues. I see CNN circle-jerk blabbering about how Donald could only be convicted if he knowingly made statements about a rigged election and didn't genuinely believe his own statements (aka made knowingly false statements to incite a riot). Of course this is laughable because he obviously believed what he was saying. Why? Because it was in fact a stolen election, enabled via the mail in ballot scheme/covid hysteria. Anyone capable of critical thinking will acknowledge the lefty lies, ceception and games are laughable yet highly disturbing.
They also can't admit formally the election was stolen on a mass scale of fraud because it compromises an imperative thing--the trust of the people in the national election process.
And yet 50% of registered Republicans still want him to lead the party and 75-90% of Republicans will still vote for him. Hillary wrong about a lot, but y'all are deplorable.
We're smarter than you. A 95% liberal media and a liberally run country by a lying stealing piece of sh*t Biden and you voted for him. His incessant lying about money, his son, the pipeline, Ukraine "$ Benefits", etc... Of course they are going to lie and make indictments on Trump, what did you think? I could write paragraphs of the lies about Trump but you aren't worth it. Soon it will be 2024 and the Democratic Leaders aren't looking forward to it. You're one of their little sheep, but many, not you, have wised up.
LOL!!!!! I LOVE IT! The downvotes have proven me right over and over.
As I've said many, many times before, this site is 75% liberal, if not more. A bunch of Bidenette sissies with no brain and prior to that they were Clintonette sissies. The real corruption is buried deep on the Left Wing side and only the wise can see it, which unfortunately leaves many of you out.
Enjoy your free 10 million Joe, none of your bonehead followers will even question it;)
"Democracy cannot survive when one side believes there are only two outcomes to an election: either they win or they were cheated. And that’s where M*GA Republicans are today."
Publix heiress faces criticism for helping finance 6 January rally
Julie Fancelli, the largest publicly known donor of the rally, gave $650,000 to three organizations that helped stage and promote it.
We will never shop a Publix because of this information. You have to believe that she was told that her donation will fund a rally that will overturn the 2020 election !
So, Trump is running for President claiming that he is the smartest and strongest candidate, but his legal defense against the indictments is that he is too impressionable and weak to counter his legal advisors.
So, Trump is running for President claiming that he is the smartest and strongest candidate, but his legal defense against the indictments is that he is too impressionable and weak to counter his legal advisors.
Cognitive dissonance is a terrible thing.
No. His legal defense will be that he still believed the election was stolen after hundreds of experts tried to pound the truth into his head. (Pro tip: He didn’t believe it).
so we are supposed to believe Trump has the mind if a child and could not grasp reality like any other adult with thinking ability.
And Trumpets will support him fully. He is their childlike imbecile and is not smart enough to know reality from lies. And therefore needs to be President again.