Anyone that is smart, of which you are not, knows that people of any race can be racist or discriminate against others.
It looks like we have found your latest trigger point to spew about and melt down, 24/7. You were on this thread spewing drivel when I went to work this morning and you're still here! Get outside and go for a walk, read a book, live a little. There's more to life than being here and triggered all of the time. It's just not a healthy option for you.
#ThereisADoltInTheRoom and he is triggered once again
So you disagree with the BLM types who argue that it's impossible for black people to be racist because they racism requires power.
You think I'm triggered and you're here ranting about a topic you clearly know nothing about... lol.
If only people like you spent as much time learning as you do pretending to be offended.
The idiot who wrote that article has PHD in racial grievance. His moronic view is mainstream on the racist left.
"Ranting" 😂
My post above was my first on this forum in a few weeks. I was merely pointing out that anyone can be racist and discriminate. The race of the person doing the discriminating has nothing to do with anything. The two are mutually exclusive. How, exactly, is that ranting?
Perhaps you should try to see what you can do about your reading comprehension.
Now, go back to being triggered and melting down, little guy 😭
You've obviously no idea what its like to be poor with a low income and compare the difference between tax benefits of being married and welfare. Not going into details but would you rather pay a couple hundred a week for child care or have it be free? Simple choice right? you think the 50 bucks a month extra you might take home when married makes up for that?
Whether the home wrecking policies are intentional or not I will not speculate on.
Whether the home wrecking policies are intentional or not I will not speculate on.
I will say though that if the Democrats are indeed intentionally trying to keep poor people poor wheres the legislation coming from the Republicans to correct the issue? There never is any. This is just a thing right wingers say with no solution.
You've obviously no idea what its like to be poor with a low income and compare the difference between tax benefits of being married and welfare. Not going into details but would you rather pay a couple hundred a week for child care or have it be free? Simple choice right? you think the 50 bucks a month extra you might take home when married makes up for that?
Whether the home wrecking policies are intentional or not I will not speculate on.
You're missing the part where having children out of wedlock before you can support them is a choice.
Being on welfare used to come with a stigma. People were embarrassed and wanted to get off of it. Now it's a multigenerational way of life and people feel entitled to it.
Finish high school. Get a job. Don't have kids until you're in a committed relationship.
It's not hard. Particularly when you can abort your babies right up until a few days after birth.
Whether the home wrecking policies are intentional or not I will not speculate on.
I will say though that if the Democrats are indeed intentionally trying to keep poor people poor wheres the legislation coming from the Republicans to correct the issue? There never is any. This is just a thing right wingers say with no solution.
Once you create entitlements they are permanent. Taking away the free goodies is political suicide and politicians care about nothing but the next election.
While I think there is something to the idea that some of the policies around welfare contribute to broken homes there are lot of other contributing factors. Like how about the CIA flooding the streets with crack just to name one.
But I think as far as welfare goes it is the implementation that is the problem ie that a single mother receives a check but as soon as she is married or the income goes too high you get nothing. There needs to be incentive for people to stay together. The counter argument is that mothers will be stuck in abusive relationships. I personally know I dont have all the answers but having gone through it (my wife and I were pretty poor when we started our family) and have seen others there is definitely room for improvement and I have to agree I dont see many people in DC on either side of the aisle trying to improve it.
The CIA peddling crack conspiracy has been debunked many times.
The incentives for staying together are in the tax code. Married couples with children get huge benefits.
The home wrecking policies were intentional to create a permanent class of Democrat voters on the government nipple.
The American government has always been meddling, to this day. This is widely known, including outside its borders....
You've obviously no idea what its like to be poor with a low income and compare the difference between tax benefits of being married and welfare. Not going into details but would you rather pay a couple hundred a week for child care or have it be free? Simple choice right? you think the 50 bucks a month extra you might take home when married makes up for that?
Whether the home wrecking policies are intentional or not I will not speculate on.
You're missing the part where having children out of wedlock before you can support them is a choice.
Being on welfare used to come with a stigma. People were embarrassed and wanted to get off of it. Now it's a multigenerational way of life and people feel entitled to it.
Finish high school. Get a job. Don't have kids until you're in a committed relationship.
It's not hard. Particularly when you can abort your babies right up until a few days after birth.
No I am not missing anything. I just live in the real world and you live in some kind of delusion it seems.
I'm not racist. For one, doesn't leftist dogma state that "people of color can't be racist"? I'm Irish and Cuban, so I'm 100% not 'white'.
Also, I view people as individuals rather than members of an "oppressed" or "privileged" group. One of the smartest people at my college was (and still is) black. I'm not stating his ethnicity for privacy purposes, but he was black. AVERAGE IQ doesn't say anything about individual IQ; it just is the median IQ for a group.
Statistically, it's far more likely that there's only one parent present.
It's an unprofessional name. End of story. My name is as long and starts with the same letter, but it's a completely normal name that won't get my resume canned. I had parents who cared about my future career.
Forget all that stuff about white guilt, privilege, CRT, and intersectionality. Their real target is the notion that America ever did anything bad to black people.
You're missing the part where having children out of wedlock before you can support them is a choice.
Being on welfare used to come with a stigma. People were embarrassed and wanted to get off of it. Now it's a multigenerational way of life and people feel entitled to it.
Finish high school. Get a job. Don't have kids until you're in a committed relationship.
It's not hard. Particularly when you can abort your babies right up until a few days after birth.
No I am not missing anything. I just live in the real world and you live in some kind of delusion it seems.
Only in your sad world is expecting people to make good decisions delusional.
No I am not missing anything. I just live in the real world and you live in some kind of delusion it seems.
Only in your sad world is expecting people to make good decisions delusional.
Whats interesting about you is that even when someone attempts to find a common ground with you you avoid it. It shows that you have no interest in actually engaging in any sort of discussion other than to argue.
Must be nice to have so much time to just simply argue on the internet.
