question... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
It isn't the shoes but something much more potent.
Says the man who spent 50 pages telling us that EPO doping makes you breathe less.
Go on explain it again for those who missed it?
Jon Orange is back again. I said EPO makes you run faster, Jon, but you didn't grasp that.
Armstronglivs wrote:
question... wrote:
Says the man who spent 50 pages telling us that EPO doping makes you breathe less.
Go on explain it again for those who missed it?
Jon Orange is back again. I said EPO makes you run faster, Jon, but you didn't grasp that.
You spent 50 pages telling us it makes you breathe more oxygen whilst breathing less air.
Go on summarize those 50 pages?
question... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Jon Orange is back again. I said EPO makes you run faster, Jon, but you didn't grasp that.
You spent 50 pages telling us it makes you breathe more oxygen whilst breathing less air.
Go on summarize those 50 pages?
I can't summarize what you haven't understood, Jon.
Armstronglivs wrote:
question... wrote:
You spent 50 pages telling us it makes you breathe more oxygen whilst breathing less air.
Go on summarize those 50 pages?
I can't summarize what you haven't understood, Jon.
Yes you can, you're an Oxygen Kinetics expert.
Go on tell us how EPO doping makes an athlete breathe less?
briswiss wrote:
Nothing to see here guys. Definitely legit.
Always amusing to see how many of those who consider themselves fans of the sport are completely ignorant of its history.
Keep 'em coming. It makes me feel special.
No one accuses the best NBA, NFL or MLB or NHL or tennis players of doping, yet runners have a tendency to trash their own. Ever wonder now why running won't achieve the mainstream appeal of those other sports? Perhaps you should stop cannibalizing each other's accomplishments.
Runners are like crabs in a barrel especially when measuring performances across genders.
Majority of people on LR has such low expectations of themselves and others. Its a shame really. Accusing someone of doping straightaway when they have no idea how much of testings and investigation goes on for these top athletes, and not forgetting the sacrifice, the amount of training to reach this level . Of course how would you know when you cant even outrun a high school east African girl.
Welcome to the future. There is no limit. Men Elites should now be targeting Sub 55 minutes for the Half and women should be aiming for sub 1 hour. And the rest of you losers can keep complaining and stop improving . The world is evolving. Wake up.
Internetsherlock wrote:
Majority of people on LR has such low expectations of themselves and others. Its a shame really. Accusing someone of doping straightaway when they have no idea how much of testings and investigation goes on for these top athletes, and not forgetting the sacrifice, the amount of training to reach this level . Of course how would you know when you cant even outrun a high school east African girl.
Welcome to the future. There is no limit. Men Elites should now be targeting Sub 55 minutes for the Half and women should be aiming for sub 1 hour. And the rest of you losers can keep complaining and stop improving . The world is evolving. Wake up.
No, it's rather because people here know the nature of doping and how hard it is to test positive (through microdosing for instance). No one is disputing that every single elite athlete is very talented and hard-working. But there's for sure reason to be sceptic, otherwise you're just delusional.
Performance enhancing drugs are awesome
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
No one accuses the best NBA, NFL or MLB or NHL or tennis players of doping, yet runners have a tendency to trash their own. Ever wonder now why running won't achieve the mainstream appeal of those other sports? Perhaps you should stop cannibalizing each other's accomplishments.
Runners are like crabs in a barrel especially when measuring performances across genders.
Maybe it's because our athletes actually get banned for it
Armstronglivs wrote:
question... wrote:
You spent 50 pages telling us it makes you breathe more oxygen whilst breathing less air.
Go on summarize those 50 pages?
I can't summarize what you haven't understood, Jon.
You admit that you lie and cheat in your posts and have stated that you will not read about a subject prior to posting.
Get off these boards.
liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I can't summarize what you haven't understood, Jon.
You admit that you lie and cheat in your posts and have stated that you will not read about a subject prior to posting.
Get off these boards.
I admit I "lie and cheat" - something you simply accuse me of - you really are quite a nutter, aren't you? The voices in your head have completely taken over.
question... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I can't summarize what you haven't understood, Jon.
Yes you can, you're an Oxygen Kinetics expert.
Go on tell us how EPO doping makes an athlete breathe less?
Jon, I will say this - a shortage of oxygen to the brain can have tragic consequences. I feel for you.
Armstronglivs wrote:
And the denial never ends - with the Denier-in-Chief turning up to feed on the carcase. There is no level of performance that would rouse his suspicions - all are clean - even when they produce a doping violation (Shelby). Gidey could run 57x and it would still not be doped in his books. Nothing ever is.
You’ve said yourself many times we cannot tell which of the fastest performances are doped performances. Did you mean it?
But you digress. The question I raised here, is why there are not a large number of doped non-African women producing levels of performance much faster than a 1987 Ingrid Kristiansen.
Regarding Houlihan, her sample was dated 15 December 2020. Which performance on which date should I consider suspicious?
Has anyone ever thought to check the plumbing on this chick? Maybe she's rolling with XY chromosomes.
Armstronglivs wrote:
question... wrote:
Yes you can, you're an Oxygen Kinetics expert.
Go on tell us how EPO doping makes an athlete breathe less?
Jon, I will say this - a shortage of oxygen to the brain can have tragic consequences. I feel for you.
But you lie and refuse to read
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
And the denial never ends - with the Denier-in-Chief turning up to feed on the carcase. There is no level of performance that would rouse his suspicions - all are clean - even when they produce a doping violation (Shelby). Gidey could run 57x and it would still not be doped in his books. Nothing ever is.
You’ve said yourself many times we cannot tell which of the fastest performances are doped performances. Did you mean it?
But you digress. The question I raised here, is why there are not a large number of doped non-African women producing levels of performance much faster than a 1987 Ingrid Kristiansen.
Regarding Houlihan, her sample was dated 15 December 2020. Which performance on which date should I consider suspicious?
He won’t have clue and will lie to cover up that he won’t read.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
You admit that you lie and cheat in your posts and have stated that you will not read about a subject prior to posting.
Get off these boards.
I admit I "lie and cheat" - something you simply accuse me of - you really are quite a nutter, aren't you? The voices in your head have completely taken over.
Check your previous stuff and indeed you admitted lying and cheating before.
Go away!
Armstronglivs wrote:
question... wrote:
Yes you can, you're an Oxygen Kinetics expert.
Go on tell us how EPO doping makes an athlete breathe less?
Jon, I will say this - a shortage of oxygen to the brain can have tragic consequences. I feel for you.
Gee thanks. I'm humbled that you stayed up all night in New Zealand thinking of me. You must get even less sleep than rojo?
What is the criteria used to determine whether or not to test a woman for her naturally occurring testosterone levels? Are athletes,like Gidey ,when they are tested for PED's tested for their testosterone level ? Isn't it possible for a woman who doesn't look Masculine to have a high naturally occurring level of test ?