Johns Hopkins: COVID19 Has Had Almost "no effect on deaths in the United States"

Best always to rely on MSM to keep all news hidden from you- one of the most powerful tools of propaganda is that of omission.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/

You complain about propaganda and then quote RT? The Russian propaganda outlet?

trashcan wrote:

You complain about propaganda and then quote RT? The Russian propaganda outlet?

Give him a break. Where he's from, RT is the MSM.

Well, the CDC has been politicized by the Trump administration, which has overridden the agency's scientists on numerous occasions, to all of our detriment. So, it is not the scientists who are serving a political agenda.

In case no one posted this in pages 2-6, here is what that student newspaper says after retracting the article:

"Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers. "

So they've really resorted to pull any counter-official narrative information? They didn't even try to conclusively prove the study was wrong.

Sure, this is a Gates funded school but still, this is scary stuff.

OMG, stasi plice state truly is here wrote:

So they've really resorted to pull any counter-official narrative information? They didn't even try to conclusively prove the study was wrong.

Sure, this is a Gates funded school but still, this is scary stuff.

There's been plenty of refutations in this thread alone. The university in no way has to let poor scholarship remain accessible -- especially if it's published by the university or students itself.

Emergency over today.

What emergency ?

An excess deaths number avoids the coding issues involved with enhanced covid payments and also allows for indirect deaths due to isolation, depression, child care, difficulty finding work, getting proper medical care, etc.

Every excess death number I have looked at was strong and positive during the covid era This number is not easily manipulated.

Longevity in NYC fell by 4.6 years.

The IQ in NYC fell by even more.

The largest change in death numbers since the Great Leap Forward.
DanM now a Maoist apologist?