Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I've actually be trying to take you seriously at times, but you mess around with semantics on the Biden quote, to broad conclusions on anecdotal allegations, to clearly playing games and bizarrely refusing to say what you actually believe.

Of course Biden was referring to the Capital police. That's who everyone is referring to when discussing these issues, even when they don't recite "Capitol police". Of course Biden was alleging he believes racism is an issue here with the Capitol police, when he strongly delivers a speech pointing out what he believes are differences in how police responded to black rioters versus white rioters. If you watch the entirety what he said, there's no doubt what he is alleging. You can find analysis of it on every single MSM website. The only one being vague and obtuse about it, for reasons I can't figure out, is you.

You really think Biden was only referring to response time of the National Guard? You think he decided to arrange a conference to say in strongly worded terms what he said, because he's upset that there was a delay in the decision to call the National Guard?

At the risk of indulging this stupidity, maybe the National Guard was present at the DC BLM riots, because of previous and recent experiences in other cities with BLM's rioting. And by the way, during Minneapolis' BLM riots, the National Guard didn't get called for two days. A lot of innocent businesses could have been saved by calling them earlier.

How about this - I will assume, because I don't have enough information one way or the other, that you are correct that the Capitol police treated BLM rioters differently than yesterday's Trump rioters. The ONLY conclusion I think one can draw from that is the Capitol police were acting racist. That's the conclusion drawn by commentators on every MSM website I see. Isn't that your conclusion and opinion? If not, why are you even discussing this with me, and continuously pressing it? Do YOU have an opinion on whether the Capitol police were acting racists yesterday? You're defying all credibility if you say you don't have an opinion. Will you tell me what that opinion is?

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes, the Sergeant at Arms should be fired.

But you need a lot more context to know if that cop was aiding a riot.

Look at the other videos of the one of those cops (short heavy person) waving the rioters in after the same gate is opened. And look back at this video and seem a short heavy person come from the spot where the gate was first opened. It appears to be the same person because only one of the officers in that area has that body type. The shortest person, and the most heavy set.

There was only one entry gate they all passed through ... in front of the steps.

That may not be enough for you, but I notice you are more cautious and want more direct evidence, whatever that may mean.

Trollminator wrote:

Quite the different treatment huh?

https://twitter.com/bumbera_steven/status/1347270969988173825?s=21

Yea, hard to interpret that wave as anything other than "come on in".

Though I guess he could have been signaling another officer to move forward. But I doubt it.

25th wrote:

I am Sam wrote:

Guys, just a neutral outsider observation, can we please stick to the issues, its making it hard to read with clutter from tiffs between posters, allegations of usernames etc...just let them be...they lost

Learn to ignore posts you don't want to read. It is easy if you try. Sally has posted here under dozens of names. Can't let them him/her be when they attack posters under different names to make their position look stronger. That is how it is in Sallyland.

This is getting old. I ONLY post here as Sally and Calamity. Please.

Fat hurts wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Quite the different treatment huh?

https://twitter.com/bumbera_steven/status/1347270969988173825?s=21

Yea, hard to interpret that wave as anything other than "come on in".

Though I guess he could have been signaling another officer to move forward. But I doubt it.

Obviously an Antifa guy that stole a police uniform.

No, you have me confused with Real Obvi. I'm the guy who never answered the question about your IQ.

Sally Vix wrote:

This is getting old. I ONLY post here as Sally and Calamity. Please.

No one here believes you. We know better that you post here under dozens of names.

Sally Vix wrote:

25th wrote:

Learn to ignore posts you don't want to read. It is easy if you try. Sally has posted here under dozens of names. Can't let them him/her be when they attack posters under different names to make their position look stronger. That is how it is in Sallyland.

This is getting old. I ONLY post here as Sally and Calamity. Please.

And I don't attack anyone here except Flagpole who is just insufferable.

Flybang mosh wrote:

No, you have me confused with Real Obvi. I'm the guy who never answered the question about your IQ.

Now this is a typical Sally unregistered name post. Blame another poster for your fetus drink pass given to Trump.

Fat hurts wrote:

Marietta Tar Heel wrote:

You say: "We don't know the circumstances."

Then: "But it would have been stupid to escalate the situation if he wasn't prepared to make an arrest. So he just stood there."

Make up your mind.

Learn the meaning of the word "if".

Again, in your own words.

"We don't know the circumstances."

"If you look at what happened, the cop did nothing wrong. It was the rioter who took the selfie. The cop didn't actually participate. He was just standing there."

You are right that we don't know the circumstances. However, you can't then go and say the cop did nothing wrong.

It is much more likely that it was his job to protect the Capitol and not let hundreds of rioters in than it was to just stand there and let people in.

Sally Vix wrote:

And I don't attack anyone here except Flagpole who is just insufferable.

Not true. I see know why you like Trump so much. Not being truthful is a builtin feature.

Marietta Tar Heel wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Learn the meaning of the word "if".

Again, in your own words.

"We don't know the circumstances."

"If you look at what happened, the cop did nothing wrong. It was the rioter who took the selfie. The cop didn't actually participate. He was just standing there."

You are right that we don't know the circumstances. However, you can't then go and say the cop did nothing wrong.

It is much more likely that it was his job to protect the Capitol and not let hundreds of rioters in than it was to just stand there and let people in.

Sally, #sad.

25th wrote:

I am Sam wrote:

Guys, just a neutral outsider observation, can we please stick to the issues, its making it hard to read with clutter from tiffs between posters, allegations of usernames etc...just let them be...they lost

Learn to ignore posts you don't want to read. It is easy if you try. Sally has posted here under dozens of names. Can't let them him/her be when they attack posters under different names to make their position look stronger. That is how it is in Sallyland.

I don't read them.

But how long are you going to argue the same s**t with the same fool...it clutters the thread whether you skip it or not

Josh Hawley's attempt to overthrown the election has lead to his book deal (Tyranny) has been terminated by Simon & Schuster.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/simon-schuster-cancels-josh-hawley-s-book-citing-capitol-riots/ar-BB1czaGG?eType=EmailBlastContent

25th wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

And I don't attack anyone here except Flagpole who is just insufferable.

Not true. I see know why you like Trump so much. Not being truthful is a builtin feature.

I posted a whopping five times today with this being the fifth. The first was saying I am not Marietta, and the three others responding to your misplaced allegations.

I am Sam wrote:

But how long are you going to argue the same s**t with the same fool...it clutters the thread whether you skip it or not

Stop whining about what other people post. Stop trying to be the thread mother. Because that is what you are crying for.

Sally Vix wrote:

I posted a whopping five times today with this being the fifth. The first was saying I am not Marietta, and the three others responding to your misplaced allegations.

0/10

Oh, by the way, when you take a break from posting nearly all of the mass of negative posts disappear, and sanity resumes. And that is what my goal is. Going after you has eventually worked over the the years you have posted here. You go back here a lot longer than you claim. I go back on LRC 15 years, and there always you around.

BY working out I mean you stop posting for many days under the mass of names you use. It is like night and day.

It is getting dark and you should be out on your porch picking a female fan of your 60-year old model body, who still runs 15 minute 5ks, for a night's stay. Your loyal wife Chinese wife doesn't mind, right.