politically incorrect whiteboi wrote:
Notreally wrote:I have just seen Teeters race in HD, size-wise he is huge.
It looks like he added a lot of mass in the span of a few month since the winter indoor season.
What is funny is that people keep telling on how White Sprinters peak later and so on, and this guy is still a collegiate...If it is really the case I wonder what kind of size he's going to reach naturally.
If he is not natural, however, I don't think he' ll have a long career, or it will have a few hiatuses, as it will be very hard to keep doing what he does when going from NCAA to USADA testing.
With that muscular mass, you wonder why he did not run 9"7 yet
there's not a chance teeters is "natural", and if by natural you mean "just" a gram of testosterone a week, then yea, he's natural.
I find it funny how this thread has literally become a debate of whether or not blacks have superior genetics for sprinting compared to other races, and who in their right mind (besides overly politically correct people) would say they don't? It's obvious that west African genetics are suited for speed and that's the reason why most sub 10 sprinters are black. The non black sub ten sprinters are truly exceptions to the rule. And there are plenty of white kids doing sprints in usa, they simply don't have the "sub 10 genetics".
Why do you think teeters is using steroids? Just because he's a white sprinter? He is probably the only clean sprinters in this entire trials.