i'd swear i had this convo with vandy girl. vandy girl had a 1490 which while good was sub-vandy, and then vandy wouldn't answer her emails. the details matter. if the coaches are responding matters. whether you are the one they want or a fallback matters. whether you have the academics to get in on your own matters.
i say this because marginal kids seem to think track helps them off marginal admissions when they are marginal at track, too. that's not how it works.
when i had this same convo with vandy girl it was like at an ivy you will be roughly top 50 and we'll see if they grab you. at patriot -- which depending might be where your SATs are -- you're top 20 and more of a catch. at d3 you're top 10-15 in the country and that will write your ticket.
but the faulty premise of this thread, whether a troll, pot-stirring, or sincere, is you can't settle a debate like this on paper. depending which metric gets you a different answer. hence great for stirring the pot. but you get different answers depending exactly how smart or fast you are, preferences, etc.
the normal thread on this is they ask who would take me and you'd then get back some ivy, all patriot, all d3. and for the ivies that may be bs without an SAT.
for illustration's sake, someone could be like what's the best SCIAC for me. and we could have a paper debate. likely landing on CMS vs. PP with maybe some oxy fans. and then the OP comes back and says, oh, btw, my SAT is 1050. and that just blew up the whole list. at which point, yeah, we start asking, is this just a game, or is this someone so sloppy they leave out the most important details.