rekrunner wrote:
Sorry but these are neither lies nor deflections. When the claim is a burrito containing offal, all of the pork based ingredients found in a burrito become relevant, until they are ruled out.
This is completely wrong, and you know it. It was all about one specific offal burrito from one specific food truck made out of stomach, not "a burrito". That some restaurants in Mexico serve offal with testicles etc., is completely irrelevant here.
And there is no morphing of the claim either, different people just describe the same claim (offal made out stomach muscle/meat) in different ways.
Also note that no one ever complained about those claims/that claim, not the AIU, not WA, not any of the six experts present, regardless which side brought them in, not even the doper herself, and not even her lawyer (!). Not even in that insane press conference! None of the experts consulted afterwards criticized that either. That should tell you something. Because it is all correct: the claim was offal made out of stomach. The only inexplicable thing is that you just tripled down on your lie.
Had Shelby wanted CAS to consider other nandrolone-rich sources, she would have had to make that specific claim and provide "specific and concrete elements", which she couldn't, because there were none.
Therefore the expert testimony was logically "limited to pork meat and stomach".
And yet here you are, 3.5 years later, still not understanding it... or so you pretend to keep the discussion going.