Sighor wrote:
Like these boards always suggest. If it ain't drugs then it gotta be drugs. smh.
Absolutely correct sir!!!!!!!
Sighor wrote:
Like these boards always suggest. If it ain't drugs then it gotta be drugs. smh.
Absolutely correct sir!!!!!!!
Armchair dOpInG Expert wrote:
WRONG SIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I hate your bad attitude on this board with regards to antidoping!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is not how you should be behaving sir!!!!!!!!
Antidoping organizations are full of politics and politicking, self-interests and red tape you didn't know that sir?????? If somebody in the organization wants to act, they need to get permission, and then get higher permission and then cross check with the government and law enforcement and all these can take very very long you feeling me sir?????
Whereas Coevett and Khamis and Armstrong the antidoping trinity are able to initiate antidoping proceedings literally on a whim in 1 second. We just need to collect our thoughts, relook whatever subjective evidence is available on the record and take the potential culprit to 'court' on LRC, you feeling me sir????
It's fast, it's highly accurate (if you have the skills like me and Coevett and Armstrong) and beats WADA every time!!!!!!!!
Please stop wrote:
Can you please stop writing like this? It's like I'm having a seizure
Could you give me an example pls??? Like what????? I write normally albeit sometimes very ferociously!!!!! But that's because I'm in the business of catching cheaters!!!!