THOUGHTSLEADER wrote:
Disrespecting Peter Elliott I see. Anyhow, you've completely derailed a conversation of Brian Komen, which was interesting with a couple of sources from Kenya. Even your thoughts on how quickly a 24-year-old runner could progress and their theoretical potential ceiling was somewhat interesting even if I didn't agree. I don't see what the timing of EPO use has to do with all this, and it'd be better if we just return to Komen. He is like this year's Nordas, so it is interesting to see what he will get up to and more of his background and personal details than rehashing old arguments of EPO and doping world views.
Hahaha, I thought this was addressed to Rekrunner, I should have known.
I don't think anybody would say that Peter Elliott 'dominated' middle-distance running in the way that Coe, Ovett, and Cram had done. The fact is, he didn't win a global title or break an outdoor WR.
In any case, Elliott is an outlier in that he was a full-time factory worker for most of his career, so he peaked in his late twenties. Who knows what he could have done if he hadn't waited until Seoul in 1988 to go full-time (I think even then he still did part-time work at the steel mill)?
Komen is not Nordas, that is ridiculous. Nordas was alreay a national class runner, and he switched down to the 1500m from 10000m under arguably the best 1500m coach in the world.
As I pointed out earlier, Komen is not even Katir. At least we knew Katir's background and progression.
As for 'derailing the thread', I started this thread did I not? And my intention in starting it was to provoke a discussion as to the oddness of somebody being able to come literally out of nowhere and become a DL winner and Olympic gold canddiate in little more than 12 months.