3 lanoys and 2 schorrs scoring for the team. This is crazy. Like the Sahlmans and Youngs
-
10
-
welljustcuzisaid wrote:
Tol419 wrote:
Toledo St. Francis has the talent for top 5 showing this year.
I don't know. I think the Riverside Kickoff race was especially fast, so it may be skewing the Milesplit rankings just a bit.
Either super fast or short, the fact that almost 50% of the top 50 rankings are from that race is kinda sketchy. Cernansky Dropping 40 seconds while being that fast as well...
00 -
1.Mason
2. Springboro
3. St. Xaiver
4. Westerville North
5. Solon
6.Loveland
7.Massillon Jackson
8.Lancaster
9. Medina
10.Davidson
00 -
LivingGhostofBobbyK wrote:
1.Mason
2. Springboro
3. St. Xaiver
4. Westerville North
5. Solon
6.Loveland
7.Massillon Jackson
8.Lancaster
9. Medina
10.Davidson
Westerville North is certainly solid, but not top 5 in the state. They'll have to run well at regionals, or they risk not even getting out.
Kilbourne has a better 1-2-3, and they also are on the fence for state qualifying. I have Coffman, Lancaster, and Davidson all ahead of W. North, and that's just region 3.
10 -
Dublin Coffman should definitely be in the top 10.
00 -
event is done but no results? Huh?
00 -
Weerzeer wrote:
event is done but no results? Huh?
It was rained out. Started to storm just as girls were about to go off
00 -
Farmers Almanac wrote:
Weerzeer wrote:
event is done but no results? Huh?
It was rained out. Started to storm just as girls were about to go off
From Westerville N...
W North 70
Desales 80
Kilbourne 85
Olentangy 119
Scioto 120
others.... deep
Kilbourne's Smith put on a huge surge to drop Gabelman pretty definitively with 1000 to go, winning in 15:38. Gabelman 2nd in 16:00. Miller started way back but charged hard to battle Bracken for 3rd. Both finished around 16:09. Weston Day was back a ways, but looked like he may have been tempo-ing this one.
Kilbourne goes 1-4-5, but North's depth showed up. This group looks really strong. DeSales sneaks into 2nd by packing their entire varsity between Kilbourne's 3 & 4. Scioto and Olentangy were non-factors.
00 -
00
-
Mas Jackson returns everybody next year too
00 -
Davidson girls look pretty solid.
40 -
Mason has a home meet on sep 10
00 -
welljustcuzisaid wrote:
LivingGhostofBobbyK wrote:
1.Mason
2. Springboro
3. St. Xaiver
4. Westerville North
5. Solon
6.Loveland
7.Massillon Jackson
8.Lancaster
9. Medina
10.Davidson
I think you could put Springboro, Mas. Jackson, Solon, Medina or Lancaster at #2 after this week and justify it, and Davidson and St. Xavier are probably competitive with that group too. Of course there's still one team that hasn't run.
00 -
gotb mor wrote:
welljustcuzisaid wrote:
I think you could put Springboro, Mas. Jackson, Solon, Medina or Lancaster at #2 after this week and justify it, and Davidson and St. Xavier are probably competitive with that group too. Of course there's still one team that hasn't run.
Definitely Mas Jackson and Hil Davidson in front of Springboro. These results show that
00 -
Weerzeer wrote:
Definitely Mas Jackson and Hil Davidson in front of Springboro. These results show that
Or you could look at the fact that Springboro beat Davidson by 80 in the first meet of the season against a much better field. Springboro will definitely finish ahead of them at the state meet.
00 -
Springboro’s top 5 was the same for both meets so they were missing no one from that group the second time they faced Hil Davidson. Interesting
00 -
gotb mor wrote:
Springboro will definitely finish ahead of them at the state meet.
That's doubtful...
20 -
I do not think so wrote:
gotb mor wrote:
Springboro will definitely finish ahead of them at the state meet.
That's doubtful...
I just looked at the results again and Springboro does have an impressive 19 second 1-5 split and Davison is has a 1:50 1-5 Split. Davidson's 4 & 5 guys need to tighten up a bit.
10 -
I do not think so wrote:
I do not think so wrote:
That's doubtful...
I just looked at the results again and Springboro does have an impressive 19 second 1-5 split and Davison is has a 1:50 1-5 Split. Davidson's 4 & 5 guys need to tighten up a bit.
Davidson’s spread the second time was tighter the second time than the first time, and Springboro’s spread was tighter the first time than the second time.
First meet:
Hill Davidson top 5:
15:29
16:22 (53 seconds back)
17:33 (124 seconds back)
17:37 (128 seconds back)
17:45 (136 seconds back)Meet 2
14:57
15:46 (49 seconds back)
16:19 (72 seconds back)
16:41 (104 seconds back)
16:48 (111 seconds back)Maybe Hil Davidson is closing the gap on Ackley more? This is why they beat Springboro here?
Springboro’s spread between 1-5 was 19 seconds the second time but 9 seconds the first time they raced against hil davidson.
00 -
I’m not sure if Hill Davidson’s 4 and 5 will close the gap behind their third. Only their top 3 broke 9:45 in the 3200 last spring. No one else broke 10 minutes. But if 2 people can close the gap that would be awesome
10
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.