Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
#1. Can you tell me why I should take your words over those of American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association and American Psychological Association?
#2. I don't think being a transwoman is the same as "being born with the reproductive anatomy of the desired sex." So I don't know why you bring that up.
#3. Are the current medical guidelines for transgenders in sports based on the queer theory? How about the the guidelines for medical treatments for transgender youths? Why are you bringing up this "queer theory" into the discussion?
#4 The video has nothing to do with the makeup, clothing or plastic surgery. Since you refuse to watch the video, I will explain who those three people are. The first person has CAIS, raised as female, and identifies as female. The second person has CAH, raised as female, and identifies as non-binary. The third person has PAIS, raised as male, and identifies as female. Now can you tell us which of them are "women"? If not, can you tell us why?
#5. You are building a strawman. Men who have records of supporting women's sports are not shot down as not caring about women's sports. But many (if not "most") people who are speaking against trans athletes didn't care about women's sports before. And it goes both ways, some are called "the enemy of women's sports" because they don't support total and complete ban on trans athletes at every level in all sports.
#6. My point is the eligibility in para sports is NOT determined by the type of disability a person has. It is determined by the functional strength each person has. If you want to use the para analogy, then the reason for excluding trans athletes should be based on their physical advantage, and NOT on whether they should be recognized as female.
#7. Most child psychologists agree that our gender identity is formed in the first 3-4 years of our life. I don't know where 70-85% figure comes from, but that does not mean we should pretend the other 15-30% does not exist.
#8. I don't think FINA and UCI are "kicking down the can." They need to make sure their new policy is defensible in the court.
#9. Is there any place where a trans girl can be treated as a girl, other than in the closet of their parent's house? Or is it okay to treat them as girls outside of sports?
#10. Penn swimmers could not voice their opinions because their woke coaches supported Thomas. But other than that, who were silenced? Was Erika Brown cancelled for her opinion? How about Reka Gyorgy? Madison Kenyon and Mary Kate Marshall are still competing on Idaho State's varsity team. Ainsley Erzen will start her college career at Arkansas this fall. I bet anyone who speaks against Thomas will be welcome as heroes at many schools in the South, Midwest and Mountain West. Even W&M, hardly a bastion of religious conservatism, has a place for Chelsea Mitchell, who filed a law suit and wrote an op-ed against trans athletes.
Are Ellie Baker and Emily Diamond now cancelled?
For the record, I fully support all those young women's right to voice their opinions. But I also think young women like Erica Sullivan and Brooke Forde should be able to speak their mind without being called "brainwashed" "biased" "self-serving" "coerced" or whatever they have been called.
You shouldn't take my word for it, nor should you take the word of the various professional organizations you've listed. I'm usually swayed by the logic of an argument and whether or not there is evidence to support the argument.
Queer theory has definitely affected the medical profession and treatment guidelines, and multiple scientific fields. This is why we have formerly credible publications suddenly pretending that biological sex is a spectrum and so many people are offended when others point out that males who identify as girls or women are not, in fact, girls or women.
As Run Ragged has pointed out, DSDs are not the same thing as trans. Biological sex refers to the type of gamete one's reproductive anatomy is organized around, not to how a person looks.
I'm not responding to all of your points, but I will point out that identity development occurs during adolescence and young adulthood, not by ages 3-4. Anybody who argues this--and, yes, I've heard gender theory-evangelized doctors argue this absurd point--is confusing a child's capacity to recognize his or herself as a boy or a girl with this mystical concept called gender identity.