Allen the guy wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
The site logs reports, and makes no judgement or decision at to whether or not the reports are credible or legitimate. Reports may be from the general public.
From their site: "VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. "
So exactly what are you trying to say? That we should completely ignore vaers now when it comes to covid vaccine issues?? The same vaers we used for years to determine the danger of vaxxes?
Vaers is required by law to report truthful reports. Something that CDC and who have had trouble with historically, especially recently.
Vaers is actually the closest thing we have to understanding the gravity of the situation and you're trying to sweep it under the rug?
From the VAERS site:
"The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.”
And goes on to say how reports may be investigated:
"If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine."