Wise Old Man wrote:
Just because the allegations and process have not been disclosed to you doesn’t mean the process was secret in the way that matters, secret to Salazar. Do you think he was not presented with the evidence against him, or that he did not have every opportunity to rebut the allegations and state his case and be exonerated? Let’s assume he did. He had big money and a giant corporation on his side, at least at the start, who were very invested in seeing him return. Well, he lost. Your curiosity may not be satisfied, but that’s not the point is it? If Salazar has anything to say about the fairness of the process and the unjustness of the outcome, let him come forward. Who’s stopping him? I bet the allegations are a lot worse than the public knows and the damning evidence far greater and the reason Salazar has been silent is because this is the best possible outcome for him. He’s staying out of prison and he’s able to continue with having some in the public believe the charade that he is the victim in all of this.
Looks like you beat me to this point, Wise Old Man. I guess I should have read the whole thread before responding. Unfortunately, I think our point will fall on deaf ears.