We've seen the same data, and reached different conclusions. I am deeply suspect of the methods you've used to reach your conclusions; but its clear you aren't here to change your mind (maybe I am not either!)... so...
You were wrong. There’s no shame in that. You’re not the first one to fall for propaganda.
I am highly confident I am right. Willing to put money on this too! There is no absolute threshold for “proof” as you are showing. Your assertion that we have not reached such threshold is a personal problem. I am convinced with the positive data and entirely unconvinced by your negative data. Nothing you’ve shown directly contradicts positive data, it merely attempts to say “there is some uncertainty!” - all data has underlying undercertainty, that’s not a problem.
You seem to be misunderstanding how humans determine what to believe.
Why is it necessary to have circuitboards made at scale? Were circuitboards the only thing keeping us from going to the moon? I thought that the problem was radiation shielding. What was the problem then?
Luckily for you, there are multiple manned lunar missions planned for the next few years
All of those future manned lunar missions will fail. GUARANTEED.
Stop believing in fairy tales.
I’ll give you 10:1 odds on that and bet $1k. ”Within the next 30 years, humans will set foot on the moon or Mars”
All of those future manned lunar missions will fail. GUARANTEED.
Stop believing in fairy tales.
I’ll give you 10:1 odds on that and bet $1k. ”Within the next 30 years, humans will set foot on the moon or Mars”
deal?
You have been wrong for the last 51 years. If you believe that NASA sent people through the Van Allen belts in the late 60's until 1972 in tin cans w/o any lead shielding, then I can't help you. Sorry, you are hopelessly lost & a prisoner to NASA's BS.
I’ll give you 10:1 odds on that and bet $1k. ”Within the next 30 years, humans will set foot on the moon or Mars”
deal?
You have been wrong for the last 51 years. If you believe that NASA sent people through the Van Allen belts in the late 60's until 1972 in tin cans w/o any lead shielding, then I can't help you. Sorry, you are hopelessly lost & a prisoner to NASA's BS.
The truth comes out. Words are cheap. 😎
I’ll set up a prediction market for this. Let’s do this.
Exactly! The NASA believers have no answer for the hammer sounds video which I posted a couple times nor have an answer as to why RF signals traveled faster than the speed of light. In both cases the laws of physics were broken.
It's pathetic to see how these NASA believers have to jump through soooo many hoops to defend an obvious hoax. The appeal to authority argument is not working.
Sound doesn't travel through a vacuum, but it can travel through solids, liquids and gasses.
There is your answer.
The alleged faster than the speed of light lack of RF delay can best be answered with an authentic unedited original sound recording. What did you do, post youtube links? Where you found a 1 second gap between the two statements, I found a longer recording with a 55 second gap between Houston "AOS" and Columbia "high gain".
I think what broke physics here is that you found someone analyzed a recording of edited audio that removed the nearly 1 minute gap in between.
Exactly! The NASA believers have no answer for the hammer sounds video which I posted a couple times nor have an answer as to why RF signals traveled faster than the speed of light. In both cases the laws of physics were broken.
It's pathetic to see how these NASA believers have to jump through soooo many hoops to defend an obvious hoax. The appeal to authority argument is not working.
Sound doesn't travel through a vacuum, but it can travel through solids, liquids and gasses.
There is your answer.
The alleged faster than the speed of light lack of RF delay can best be answered with an authentic unedited original sound recording. What did you do, post youtube links? Where you found a 1 second gap between the two statements, I found a longer recording with a 55 second gap between Houston "AOS" and Columbia "high gain".
I think what broke physics here is that you found someone analyzed a recording of edited audio that removed the nearly 1 minute gap in between.
Wrong! I posted two videos 5 years ago. The first was unedited and the second showed NASA editing the original to comply with the necessary delay as dictated by the laws of physics. NASA was caught in a lie. You lose.
You were wrong. There’s no shame in that. You’re not the first one to fall for propaganda.
I am highly confident I am right. Willing to put money on this too! There is no absolute threshold for “proof” as you are showing. Your assertion that we have not reached such threshold is a personal problem. I am convinced with the positive data and entirely unconvinced by your negative data. Nothing you’ve shown directly contradicts positive data, it merely attempts to say “there is some uncertainty!” - all data has underlying undercertainty, that’s not a problem.
You seem to be misunderstanding how humans determine what to believe.
Sound doesn't travel through a vacuum, but it can travel through solids, liquids and gasses.
There is your answer.
The alleged faster than the speed of light lack of RF delay can best be answered with an authentic unedited original sound recording. What did you do, post youtube links? Where you found a 1 second gap between the two statements, I found a longer recording with a 55 second gap between Houston "AOS" and Columbia "high gain".
I think what broke physics here is that you found someone analyzed a recording of edited audio that removed the nearly 1 minute gap in between.
Wrong! I posted two videos 5 years ago. The first was unedited and the second showed NASA editing the original to comply with the necessary delay as dictated by the laws of physics. NASA was caught in a lie. You lose.
Or, now hear me out, you are caught in a lie, and you lose.
You posted two links to "youtube", and just called one "original". Now you are saying the "first was unedited". Are these youtube videos authentic? How did you authenticate them?
I found a recording with a 55 second delay between Houston and Columbia -- surely enough time for radio round trip.
I am highly confident I am right. Willing to put money on this too! There is no absolute threshold for “proof” as you are showing. Your assertion that we have not reached such threshold is a personal problem. I am convinced with the positive data and entirely unconvinced by your negative data. Nothing you’ve shown directly contradicts positive data, it merely attempts to say “there is some uncertainty!” - all data has underlying undercertainty, that’s not a problem.
You seem to be misunderstanding how humans determine what to believe.
You can just say you were wrong. It’s okay. 👍
Make your prediction here; we can share some actual skin in the game.
That's rude. And incorrect. One website is not a reflection of 'contemporary American culture' by any means.
If you look at history, a lot of 'confirmed historical scientific facts' change over time. For example, the man who suggested that soap and cleaning hands prevents infection was committed to an asylum. No one believed him and it was an outrageous suggestion at the time. Whereas we all know now that soap helps. This was not too long ago either.
With millions worldwide, I saw the moon-landing "live" on television in 1969. It was not only one of the greatest scientific achievements of the 20th century but of all human history, that man was able to put foot on an alien world - another planet - and return.
It says much about the degeneration of this modern age that over 50 years on so many choose to construct false arguments for claiming this never happened and thereby reject one of humanity's greatest achievements.
By claiming the moon landings were faked the rest of history can also be rejected as fake - WW2 never really happened, Hiroshima was faked, as was the Holocaust - well, we've already been there - the Roman empire never existed, the Pyramids were never built, and indeed anything confirmed through established fact can be thrown in the dustbin. Nothing is true anymore - except what is randomly spouted and claimed on the internet that rejects everything science and history have taught us. We have truly built our own Tower of Babel, an outpouring of incomprehensible noise posturing as truth.
But like the Gadarene swine that went mad and threw themselves over a cliff we can see there are plenty assembled here determined to inflict upon themselves the same fate.
And then of course we have presidential candidates trying to erase history with book bans. Remember the scene in Schindler's List where Goeth tells the troops before liquidating the Krakow Ghetto;
"Today is history. Today will be remembered. Years from now the young will ask with wonder about this day. Today is history and you are part of it. Six hundred years ago, when elsewhere they were footing the blame for the Black Death, Casimir the Great - so called - told the Jews they could come to Krakow. They came. They trundled their belongings into the city. They settled. They took hold. They prospered in business, science, education, the arts. They came with nothing. And they flourished. For six centuries there has been a Jewish Krakow. By this evening those six centuries will be a rumor. They never happened. Today is history."
I’m talking about the people who said “NEVER GONNA HAPPEN”
Stay focused. You can do this.
Why are you quoting me? Have I said this?
I know you’re a little frazzled about the info you found when you were looking for something other than your debunked pics to prove we went the moon. Stay calm. It will be okay.
Exactly! The NASA believers have no answer for the hammer sounds video which I posted a couple times nor have an answer as to why RF signals traveled faster than the speed of light. In both cases the laws of physics were broken.
It's pathetic to see how these NASA believers have to jump through soooo many hoops to defend an obvious hoax. The appeal to authority argument is not working.
Sound doesn't travel through a vacuum, but it can travel through solids, liquids and gasses.
There is your answer.
The alleged faster than the speed of light lack of RF delay can best be answered with an authentic unedited original sound recording. What did you do, post youtube links? Where you found a 1 second gap between the two statements, I found a longer recording with a 55 second gap between Houston "AOS" and Columbia "high gain".
I think what broke physics here is that you found someone analyzed a recording of edited audio that removed the nearly 1 minute gap in between.
Sound does not travel in a vacuum and if a metal post was to be hammered into the surface of the moon, you are still in a vacuum and there will be no sound.
Here is another sound in a vacuum. Amazing how Apollo kept defying the laws of physics while on the moon:
Sound doesn't travel through a vacuum, but it can travel through solids, liquids and gasses.
There is your answer.
The alleged faster than the speed of light lack of RF delay can best be answered with an authentic unedited original sound recording. What did you do, post youtube links? Where you found a 1 second gap between the two statements, I found a longer recording with a 55 second gap between Houston "AOS" and Columbia "high gain".
I think what broke physics here is that you found someone analyzed a recording of edited audio that removed the nearly 1 minute gap in between.
Sound does not travel in a vacuum and if a metal post was to be hammered into the surface of the moon, you are still in a vacuum and there will be no sound.
Here is another sound in a vacuum. Amazing how Apollo kept defying the laws of physics while on the moon:
Ohhhhhhhhh that's because that's an EDITED VERSION of that clip that NASA added sound effects to because they thought it would be more realistic. Yeah that's it.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
