Good Morning, Trumpite! Just wanted to let you know that Trump is president! Hilary is not president. Just wanted to make that clear to you. I can understand why you would want to focus on anyone other than Trump since he has been a failure so far, but he is till president. Carry on.
Nancy Pelosi just as corrupt as any of them, and with a low IQ to boot.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/
Good Morning, Trumpite! Just wanted to let you know that Trump is president! Maxine Waters is not president, so nobody cares about what she does. Just wanted to make that clear to you. I can understand why you would want to focus on anyone other than Trump since he has been a failure so far, but he is till president. Carry on!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Your desperation is comical, fake news believer.
You responded to someone who was commenting on Pence using personal email for state business.
That is not fake news. That is actual real news.
Are you just brainwashed by Trump to repeat his talking points?
And the issue at hand is that the Russians are dumping fake news stories into American social media, allegedly.
Example - fake news story about a DC restaurant where Hillary Clinton had a child sex operation going on.
That is fake news. Did the Russians create this? Did Trump's campaign create this? Did they work together on these things?
When you say the term "fake news" you need to specify the news that you are calling fake.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/05/which-was-the-most-accurate-national-poll-in-the-2016-presidential-election/?utm_term=.050c3795f89bItsBaddude wrote:
Please post any poll you think was correct with their data. Just 1.
take your pick - there are many that virtually matched the final result in the popular vote. remember I'm only talking the national popular vote, not the state polls.
mcclatchy, IBD, ABC, Washpo, etc.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/05/which-was-the-most-accurate-national-poll-in-the-2016-presidential-election/?utm_term=.050c3795f89bGood Morning, Trumpite! Just wanted to let you know that Trump is president! Nancy Pelosi is not president. Just wanted to make that clear to you. I can understand why you would want to focus on anyone other than Trump since he has been a failure so far, but he is still president. Carry on.
golferinchief wrote:
Trump is visiting a school today. Guess where? Not Alabama, not Arkansas, not Ohio or South Dakota. Florida.
Guess what day it is today? Friday.
I wonder if he'll head right back to DC, or will he play a few holes and cost the taxpayers another 3 million dollars.
Twitterer and golfer in chief.
If he does go golfing, I think in this one instance it's okay to ban the press. I really, really don't want to see any more pictures of his fat a** in golf attire. The only things worse would be if he took up cycling or swimming. Ugggh...
ItsBaddude wrote:
Hillary's connections to Russia. She is corrupt, but the regular media does not cover it.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/hillarys-russia-connection/article/2004790
Does the regular media normally cover a private citizen's connections to foreign countries?
You have no evidence, libs. Sessions knows it and just called your bluff by recusing himself. So put up or shut up.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You have no evidence, libs. Sessions knows it and just called your bluff by recusing himself. So put up or shut up.
your boys had no evidence on benghazi yet went on a multi-year, multi-million dollar fishing expedition.
deal with it.
anyway, I'm really sort of surprised you don't care about finding out exactly what influence russia had on the election. I mean seriously. Wouldn't any American want to know that?
eric a blair wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:You have no evidence, libs. Sessions knows it and just called your bluff by recusing himself. So put up or shut up.
your boys had no evidence on benghazi yet went on a multi-year, multi-million dollar fishing expedition.
deal with it.
anyway, I'm really sort of surprised you don't care about finding out exactly what influence russia had on the election. I mean seriously. Wouldn't any American want to know that?
To paraphrase that low life Harry Reid, when asked whether he thought it was appropriate to smear the Mittmeister in the media with a fictitious story in the last election about him not paying his taxes, Harry replied with the response "what does it matter, look who's in the White House, IE Obama not Romney". Or something to that effect. That being said, I'm no fan of the Ruskies, but if they had any positive influence (which, for the record, I do not believe they did for an instant) on helping keep that lying, scheming, corrupt and incompetent Hillary Clinton out of the White House my hats off to them.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
eric a blair wrote:your boys had no evidence on benghazi yet went on a multi-year, multi-million dollar fishing expedition.
deal with it.
anyway, I'm really sort of surprised you don't care about finding out exactly what influence russia had on the election. I mean seriously. Wouldn't any American want to know that?
To paraphrase that low life Harry Reid, when asked whether he thought it was appropriate to smear the Mittmeister in the media with a fictitious story in the last election about him not paying his taxes, Harry replied with the response "what does it matter, look who's in the White House, IE Obama not Romney". Or something to that effect. That being said, I'm no fan of the Ruskies, but if they had any positive influence (which, for the record, I do not believe they did for an instant) on helping keep that lying, scheming, corrupt and incompetent Hillary Clinton out of the White House my hats off to them.
well there you have it.
many more people like you and the republic will be lost.
eric a blair wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:To paraphrase that low life Harry Reid, when asked whether he thought it was appropriate to smear the Mittmeister in the media with a fictitious story in the last election about him not paying his taxes, Harry replied with the response "what does it matter, look who's in the White House, IE Obama not Romney". Or something to that effect. That being said, I'm no fan of the Ruskies, but if they had any positive influence (which, for the record, I do not believe they did for an instant) on helping keep that lying, scheming, corrupt and incompetent Hillary Clinton out of the White House my hats off to them.
well there you have it.
many more people like you and the republic will be lost.
Hahaha I think not. The reality is that Russia had nothing to do with it, and the sooner you figure that out and move on to some other nonsense the better. But that does not fit the liberal narrative, does it? Hillary couldn't have lost on her own lack of merit, her relative incompetence, the rank and file populace finally figuring out how absolutely corrupt she and her clan are or the fact that shes simply a contemptible human being who also has utter contempt for the working class in this country. No, it must be the Russians..........or perhaps its George Bush's fault.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
eric a blair wrote:well there you have it.
many more people like you and the republic will be lost.
Hahaha I think not. The reality is that Russia had nothing to do with it, and the sooner you figure that out and move on to some other nonsense the better. But that does not fit the liberal narrative, does it? Hillary couldn't have lost on her own lack of merit, her relative incompetence, the rank and file populace finally figuring out how absolutely corrupt she and her clan are or the fact that shes simply a contemptible human being who also has utter contempt for the working class in this country. No, it must be the Russians..........or perhaps its George Bush's fault.
I'm just going to try to leave alone your interpretation of HRC, which is utterly unfounded after her lifetime in public service. You want to believe the fake news about her, that's fine, although it shows your lack of intelligence. . I won't argue that one anymore.
but
I won't abide your saying 'hats off' to the Russians for interfering in the election, if they did.
I don't care what news you want to read - fake or real - no American should ever think that.
eric a blair wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:Hahaha I think not. The reality is that Russia had nothing to do with it, and the sooner you figure that out and move on to some other nonsense the better. But that does not fit the liberal narrative, does it? Hillary couldn't have lost on her own lack of merit, her relative incompetence, the rank and file populace finally figuring out how absolutely corrupt she and her clan are or the fact that shes simply a contemptible human being who also has utter contempt for the working class in this country. No, it must be the Russians..........or perhaps its George Bush's fault.
I'm just going to try to leave alone your interpretation of HRC, which is utterly unfounded after her lifetime in public service. You want to believe the fake news about her, that's fine, although it shows your lack of intelligence. . I won't argue that one anymore.
but
I won't abide your saying 'hats off' to the Russians for interfering in the election, if they did.
I don't care what news you want to read - fake or real - no American should ever think that.
My interpretation and opinion of HRC is from watching her both before and during the time she was first lady and beyond (I'm being generous with the term 'lady", particularity given her treatment of her Secret Service detail, White House staff, etc). She is in fact contemptible. Her lifetime of public service? For her and her clans own benefit. She is first and foremost, all about HRC. My cousin is a retired FBI agent, was a forensic accountant. The opinion throughout the agency is that the Clinton clan is the absolute definition of a criminal enterprise. I wonder how Paula Jones et al felt about her? As I recall, she made numerous statements about how we should believe women who claim sexual abuse. Then she proceeded to destroy the women that stood in the way of Billy Boy getting into the WH. Then she tried to destroy ML who Billy Boy used as his personal humidor. She was an incompetent SOS, any significant accomplishments there except to get 4 Americans killed in Libya (through lack of action) then lie to the families as to why they were dead? Remember the proclamation in the hearing "What does it matter"? I could go on and on but I'll spare you and the other readers. AND.............I'll feel free to think what I want. Like the anarchists that have looted and destroyed property protesting Trumps election. And snowflakes that are wearing their safety pins while they protest the deportation of criminal illegals. Please.
You would be happy if a hostile dictatorship meddled with our elections.
understood.
Sick, but understood.
Anyone who still uses AOL mail is an idiot. Anyone who supports anyone who uses AOL mail is an idiot, therefore if you support the Trump administration, you are an idiot.
eric a blair wrote:
You would be happy if a hostile dictatorship meddled with our elections.
understood.
Sick, but understood.
It never happened, as much as you'd like to think it did. You did take the bait though.
AOL!!!! You've got mail!!! wrote:
Anyone who still uses AOL mail is an idiot. Anyone who supports anyone who uses AOL mail is an idiot, therefore if you support the Trump administration, you are an idiot.
AOL still exists?
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
eric a blair wrote:You would be happy if a hostile dictatorship meddled with our elections.
understood.
Sick, but understood.
It never happened, as much as you'd like to think it did. You did take the bait though.
No comments about how HRC should have been President, based on her "years of public service" her impeccable track record as a wonderful human being and stellar career as first lady in chief and SOS? Anyone care to try and make that a coherent argument?