Rigged for Hillary wrote:
As a Member of the Armed Services Committee, contact with Russian Ambassadors was Sessions job. This should have surprised no one. None of this is hurting Trump. [B[All of this is hurting the Democrats, this is why your party fails.
MAGA!!!
No other member of the Armed Services Committee met with the
eric a blair wrote:
the ENDLESS incompetence of the Trump admin just keeps surprising me
both trump and the press sec said TODAY that Sessions shoudl not recuse himself.
then he recuses.
they are going to mess up EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH
this is why you don't hire inexperienced people to run the government.
No he recused himself to try to appease democrats. Democrats in general are corrupt. They are trying to make Trump's life miserable. What goes around comes around.
When the Obama spooks "retire" the Trump spooks will start spying on the democrats. You reap what you sow.
intoodeep wrote:
Hmmm. Trump's son-in-law was with Flynn when he met with the Russiam ambassador. I wonder why...
I randomly ended up listening to the live press conference and it was clear he was being evasive about who was there and what was discussed. He was specific and clear about some minor facts. Not at all clear about the meeting itself.
He's a bad liar. There is clearly more to come.
Clown. Show.
horshad wrote:
Do you think he should have recused himself?
Sure. When the entire investigation (if there ever is one) turns up nothing, the Democrats cannot blame Sessions. Trump wins again.
RUSSIA!!!
eric a blair wrote:
the ENDLESS incompetence of the Trump admin just keeps surprising me
both trump and the press sec said TODAY that Sessions shoudl not recuse himself.
then he recuses.
they are going to mess up EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH
this is why you don't hire inexperienced people to run the government.
Except for the mainstream media and the shrieking LRC liberal echo chamber, America doesn't care about this Russian "stole the election" non-story. Get that through your thick heads.
Wrong again. Read the transcripts and do try to understand the context of the questions, because, as they say, context is everything. Your side's constant rush to hysteria is going embarrass you folks. Again.Right Tackle wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:As a Member of the Armed Services Committee, contact with Russian Ambassadors was Sessions job. This should have surprised no one. None of this is hurting Trump. [B[All of this is hurting the Democrats, this is why your party fails.
MAGA!!!
Sessions would have been fine if he told that to congress. Instead he chose to not tell the truth, while under oath. Now he's not fine.
Furthermore, you dems have lost your minds. Your party has been hijacked by leftists. America is tired of this gotcha bs. Worry about how many more seats you will lose in the midterm elections.
MAGA!!!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
eric a blair wrote:the ENDLESS incompetence of the Trump admin just keeps surprising me
both trump and the press sec said TODAY that Sessions shoudl not recuse himself.
then he recuses.
they are going to mess up EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH
this is why you don't hire inexperienced people to run the government.
Except for the mainstream media and the shrieking LRC liberal echo chamber, America doesn't care about this Russian "stole the election" non-story. Get that through your thick heads.
If america doesn't care, then why is Trump the very least popular new president of modern times?
what is it exactly they are rejecting?
ah sessions...never fails to amuse. He has shown us how awful perjury is. Thanks Beauregard for helping us to see what a piece of human waste you are.
resign.
The same oversampled dem polls that predicted a Trump loss? Try again.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The same oversampled dem polls that predicted a Trump loss? Try again.
Where's your breaking point?
I've defineitley seen your demeanor change as all this garbage starts to pile up.
Only a matter of time till your handle disappears :-)
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The same oversampled dem polls that predicted a Trump loss? Try again.
as you no doubt know, but are lying about, because your lord chief orange god tells you it's ok to lie, is that the national polls were nearly exactly dead on perfect. They said HRC would win by 2-4% and she won by 2%.
Yes, the approval polls are national.
so what else you got? Why exactly is trump the very least popular new president in modern times?
Not russia? what is it then?
Macdaddy wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:The same oversampled dem polls that predicted a Trump loss? Try again.
Where's your breaking point?
I've defineitley seen your demeanor change as all this garbage starts to pile up.
Only a matter of time till your handle disappears :-)
Wrong. I will be here, you will be the one to disappear.
eric a blair wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:The same oversampled dem polls that predicted a Trump loss? Try again.
as you no doubt know, but are lying about, because your lord chief orange god tells you it's ok to lie, is that the national polls were nearly exactly dead on perfect. They said HRC would win by 2-4% and she won by 2%.
Yes, the approval polls are national.
so what else you got? Why exactly is trump the very least popular new president in modern times?
Not russia? what is it then?
"But, but, but Hillary won the popular vote..." She didn't win shit. Fail.
oh hey, Pence used an aol account to discuss issues of Indiana terrorism defense.
ho hum.
Normally I'd expect Republicans to stand up and boo him off the stage as they did HRC, but hey they are republicans and therefore absolutely maximum hacks and partisans so they won't do that.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
eric a blair wrote:as you no doubt know, but are lying about, because your lord chief orange god tells you it's ok to lie, is that the national polls were nearly exactly dead on perfect. They said HRC would win by 2-4% and she won by 2%.
Yes, the approval polls are national.
so what else you got? Why exactly is trump the very least popular new president in modern times?
Not russia? what is it then?
"But, but, but Hillary won the popular vote..." She didn't win shit. Fail.
you are too stupid to get my point.
Your desperation is comical, fake news believer.
If Trump said he thought Sessions should not recuse himself and that he had done nothing wrong, why did Sessions recuse himself? Does Trump speak to anybody in his cabinet about anything? Who's running this WH anyhow?
packofjokers wrote:
If Trump said he thought Sessions should not recuse himself and that he had done nothing wrong, why did Sessions recuse himself? Does Trump speak to anybody in his cabinet about anything? Who's running this WH anyhow?
it's not just trump - spicer said this morning that there was no reason for recusal.
And remember that on the day Flynn was told to quit, Conway went out and told everyone Flynn had the full confidence of the prez.
clearly no one is running the white house.