honest question wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Name any top runner you like. Doping is everywhere now but the '90's have a special place in history. The glory of EPO.
Do you get paid to troll?
Do you get paid for anything?
honest question wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Name any top runner you like. Doping is everywhere now but the '90's have a special place in history. The glory of EPO.
Do you get paid to troll?
Do you get paid for anything?
honest question wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Name any top runner you like. Doping is everywhere now but the '90's have a special place in history. The glory of EPO.
Do you get paid to troll?
He is one of those anti-doping guys who would never allow himself to tested because he would blow the positive results off the scale.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Do you get paid for anything?
^ observe an eight year old commenting on this thread,
Armstronglivs wrote:
comprehension is hard for you wrote:
Name the other 45 year old guys.
Name any top runner you like. Doping is everywhere now but the '90's have a special place in history. The glory of EPO.
None of them are currently active mid 40s guys.
are you 8? wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Do you get paid for anything?
^ observe an eight year old commenting on this thread,
Sadly you can add 60 to that number.
are you 8? wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Do you get paid for anything?
^ observe an eight year old commenting on this thread,
You're too hard on yourself.
Resembling Rod Laver's Nutsack wrote:
are you 8? wrote:
^ observe an eight year old commenting on this thread,
Sadly you can add 60 to that number.
Ageist. Weak. Come on guys - you can surely do better than that. I guess not.
comprehension is hard for you wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Name any top runner you like. Doping is everywhere now but the '90's have a special place in history. The glory of EPO.
None of them are currently active mid 40s guys.
Still missing the point. A 45 year old from the EPO era still running like a youth is surely a doper, but he only falls as a subset within that vast pool of dopers that makes up the majority of top competitors in this wonderful sport today.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Resembling Rod Laver's Nutsack wrote:
Sadly you can add 60 to that number.
Ageist. Weak. Come on guys - you can surely do better than that. I guess not.
Not ageistt to tell a 60 year old to grow up.
Are you John Steiner aka jzs?
Armstronglivs wrote:
comprehension is hard for you wrote:
None of them are currently active mid 40s guys.
Still missing the point. A 45 year old from the EPO era still running like a youth is surely a doper, but he only falls as a subset within that vast pool of dopers that makes up the majority of top competitors in this wonderful sport today.
He has old man strength now. No youths run like him. They would be accused of doping if they had those abilities as kids.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Letsrun.com. wrote:
I take that back. I did not realize the Lagat have given thousands of samples willingly. And this other guy refused to give a sample. My error.
Lots of dopers have given thousands of samples willingly. Like Lance, and Marion Jones. And not tested positive. Unlike Lagat.
Lagat didn't test positive. Educate yourself.
Sorry, I forgot about "old man strength" - the reversal of the normal aging process.
RL'sNS wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Ageist. Weak. Come on guys - you can surely do better than that. I guess not.
Not ageistt to tell a 60 year old to grow up.
I bet you can blow raspberries, too. Not exactly Wildean, though.
Are you John Steiner aka jzs
Armstronglivs wrote:
RL'sNS wrote:
Not ageistt to tell a 60 year old to grow up.
I bet you can blow raspberries, too. Not exactly Wildean, though.
^ observe an eight year old having a tantrum.
yhrebray wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Lots of dopers have given thousands of samples willingly. Like Lance, and Marion Jones. And not tested positive. Unlike Lagat.
Lagat didn't test positive. Educate yourself.
He did test positive. For his A sample. Or they wouldn't have had to refer to his B sample. Educate thyself. The lab likely screwed up, so he got off.
I can't really call Brendan Lagat American since he is literally Kenyan. Let's assume he was born here. Then he is the GOAT American runner by a long shot. He has been at a high level for longer than anyone else by far. What a range. It would be cool to see if he would ran under 2:10.
Armstronglivs wrote:
yhrebray wrote:
Lagat didn't test positive. Educate yourself.
He did test positive. For his A sample. Or they wouldn't have had to refer to his B sample. Educate thyself. The lab likely screwed up, so he got off.
Read the report. If someone ran a scantron through the machine backwards and it said they failed, and then they re-ran it through correctly and they passed, as well as the carbon copy which passed, would you say they failed?
https://www.letsrun.com/2003/lagatfull.docAlso, Lance DID test positive (unlike Lagat).
honest question wrote:
Are you John Steiner aka jzs
Never heard of him. But if I was, would I tell you? I am a former long-time fan of the sport, who has come to see it as a dishonest farce. But then, that is the world of professional sport now.