rbyrne wrote:
He killed a cop the night before and blew-up people 4 days earlier....who cares if he had a gun or not under those circumstances..
So murder is no big deal?
rbyrne wrote:
He killed a cop the night before and blew-up people 4 days earlier....who cares if he had a gun or not under those circumstances..
So murder is no big deal?
He is a murder and a jihadist...he will be put to death and rightfully so...
excuse me, murderer!
Hoops wrote:
istrue wrote:Where is the proof? There is no evidence to support that claim. That is just a police guess. The same police that exchanged gunfire with an unarmed teen.
He wasn't always unarmed.
What a stupid fcking thread.
Who is the OP, a muslim from out of the USA - IP address wise?
Tin foil hat, Glen Beck-head.
The "teenager" in this case was a terrorist, a bomber, a car jacker, and for all they knew had a bomb strapped around him.
Given the firefight from the night before, I am not going to blame the police for firing.
The OP is an apologist for a murderer.
Perhaps we should have called in Oscar Pistorius, he could have hit him through the boat hull.
Jkj wrote:
Yep. Same reason a kid reaching for his wallet can get hit shot 41 times, etc. It is all too rare to find a good cop. Most of them are cowardly idiots.
"That's an offensive weapon, that is."
- Monty Python cop to man with shield
anon amie wrote:
What a stupid fcking thread.
Who is the OP, a muslim from out of the USA - IP address wise?
Tin foil hat, Glen Beck-head.
The "teenager" in this case was a terrorist, a bomber, a car jacker, and for all they knew had a bomb strapped around him.
Given the firefight from the night before, I am not going to blame the police for firing.
The OP is an apologist for a murderer.
Whoa, take a deep, calming breath dude - talk about overinvested!
It always puzzles me when 2nd Amendment supporters, whose main justification for the continued ownership of their guns is the suspicion with which they view the Government (and the police is only the civil enforcement arm of the Government), yet these same people will take as absolute Gospel that the guy the police were chasing is DEFINITELY guilty of what they say he did. Why the double standard?
Here, tell her you think the guy in the white hat had his rights violated....
ray wrote:
Here, tell her you think the guy in the white hat had his rights violated....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/25/boston-victims-medical-costs_n_3156996.html?utm_hp_ref=impact&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D304398
And if he turns out to be the wrong guy (cops have been known to make mistakes) will it matter then?
[quote]Diamond5 wrote:
[quote]fullofit wrote:
The guy is a violent and deranged Muslim, so obviously the cops were being careful.
What if he were a violent and deranged Jew?
Hoops wrote:
Timberland wrote:It could have been anyone in those pics.
I don't think there was more than one shootout going on in Watertown at that time.
What evidence does a photo of two guys who you cannot identify provide about anything?
anon amie wrote:
Hoops wrote:He wasn't always unarmed.
What a stupid fcking thread.
Who is the OP, a muslim from out of the USA - IP address wise?
Tin foil hat, Glen Beck-head.
The "teenager" in this case was a terrorist, a bomber, a car jacker, and for all they knew had a bomb strapped around him.
Given the firefight from the night before, I am not going to blame the police for firing.
The OP is an apologist for a murderer.
The media and cops have fed us an unending stream of lies since this thing took place -- yet you fail to question the official narrative. You are an apologist for dumb people
America Firster wrote:
anon amie wrote:What a stupid fcking thread.
Who is the OP, a muslim from out of the USA - IP address wise?
Tin foil hat, Glen Beck-head.
The "teenager" in this case was a terrorist, a bomber, a car jacker, and for all they knew had a bomb strapped around him.
Given the firefight from the night before, I am not going to blame the police for firing.
The OP is an apologist for a murderer.
The media and cops have fed us an unending stream of lies since this thing took place -- yet you fail to question the official narrative. You are an apologist for dumb people
Or maybe some people think about this situation critically and come to a different conclusion than you. The inability of some people to acknowledge differing viewpoints is astounding.
American Fister wrote:
America Firster wrote:The media and cops have fed us an unending stream of lies since this thing took place -- yet you fail to question the official narrative. You are an apologist for dumb people
Or maybe some people think about this situation critically and come to a different conclusion than you. The inability of some people to acknowledge differing viewpoints is astounding.
I don't think swallowing whole the official narrative when you have to realize we have been lied to repeatedly and accusing someone questioning that narrative as being an apologist for a murderer" is "thinking critically". But then again, I am not as dumb as dirt
Jkj wrote:
Yep. Same reason a kid reaching for his wallet can get hit shot 41 times, etc. It is all too rare to find a good cop. Most of them are cowardly idiots.
Teach him to reach for his wallet
Chase2 wrote:
Has anyone interviewed the kidnapped/carjacked guy who was stripped naked?
Are all victims treated this way if they tell the cops ' I'm not wired to explode.'
Or even if it WAS necessary to strip search somebody to ensure no bombs... why not let him put the clothes back on? Add this to the huge pile of ridiculousness.
Diamond5 wrote:
The only issue I have is with the police department apparently misinforming the public that the guy had shot himself. They should have told the truth from the start.
You don't have an issue with the fact that he looks pretty a-ok and non-bloody in the picture when climbing out of the boat to surrender... and then suddenly ends up shot or knifed through the throat, bloody as hell, unable to speak to communicate, and now has been shipped off to a de-commisioned military base with "mental treatment" facilities?
Yeah, I'm sure that won't hinder his side of the story from coming out.
American Fister wrote:
America Firster wrote:The media and cops have fed us an unending stream of lies since this thing took place -- yet you fail to question the official narrative. You are an apologist for dumb people
Or maybe some people think about this situation critically and come to a different conclusion than you. The inability of some people to acknowledge differing viewpoints is astounding.
I looked three times, and I still can't find where you provided any critical thinking.
America Firster wrote:
What evidence does a photo of two guys who you cannot identify provide about anything?
They were identified, moron.
The firepower trained on him was overpowering yet he is already out of the hospital.
Law Enforcement Target Practice at Noon today:
Todays Topic
Hitting the broad side of a barn and other hard stuff.