Jenni: Can we kiss and make up?
Venti: Okay, and make out?
Jenni: You turn me on when you rant and rave.
Venti: You light my fire when you bitch and beat me down.
Jenni: Can we make out now?
Venti: Okay, I'll get the vasoline?
Jenni: I'll turn on the porn?
Venti: I lust you, Venti.
Jenni: I lust you too, Jenni.
Venti: Self love is the best.
Jenni: I agree, lets make out with ourselves.
jennifer cruz wrote:
The proof is in the pudding...
No. "The proof [= the test] of the pudding is in the eating."
"The proof is in the pudding" makes no sense. It's moronic.
ventolin^3 wrote:
you make up a nonsensical hypothetical & then expect someone to take you seriously
you're describing yourself nitwit.
ventolin^3 wrote:"I" make up a nonsensical hypothetical & then expect someone to take "ME" seriously.
^^^edited
jennifer cruz wrote:
You have labeled a 43.71 as the greatest 400 ever and Jim Ryun a 3:42 miler. This is probably why you call yourself a physician. You don't live in the real world. You are extremely delusional. There are medications for your form of mental illness. Please get back to taking them, darling. I care about you, sweetie...
ventolin^3 wrote:
go fetch the oxford physicists link, then work out what
60/59/59/53 represents for an even paced mile
put up or shut the f*** up moron
The greatest 400m ever is 43.18, by Michael Johnson on August 26, 1999
Jim Ryun is a 3:51.1 miler on Feb 19, 1971
This is clear, unambiguous and in the record books. Nobody gives a shit about the guy who coulda woulda shoulda run faster but DID NOT. Nobody needs a physicist you fucking moron
Don't you believe in Astronauts? They need physicist, so do you. The moon is a harsh mistress without you my precious Jennifer.
I like chicks named Jennifer too. Sadly that is not me. Dumbass.
Sadly, so you want to be Jennifer? Joy!!!
Stinker wrote:
Sadly, so you want to be Jennifer? Joy!!!
Yes that would mean I could fondle myself and wouldn't need to hit on chicks at the bar! Joy indeed!
Yes!!! LOL, thanks for playing along.
Caster S wrote:
ventolin^3 wrote:you make up a nonsensical hypothetical & then expect someone to take you seriously
you're describing yourself nitwit.
moron
i don't make up hypothetical nonsensicals
i justify whatever i ascribe
i don't go round ascribing 26-flat nonsense to kennster, as there was evenish pace & wabbits to 5k
he can only justify faster if his effort thruout was a controlled sub-optimal effort & he can claim he couda gone 0.5s+/lap faster all the way
he never has
now idiot, stop wasting my time & show me your not a worthless piece of shit & dig up kennster's lap splits in his 26'17 & we'll see what physics says his "perfect" even paced time wouda been
Thinker wrote:
The greatest 400m ever is 43.18, by Michael Johnson on August 26, 1999
a simplistic view, but that is a moron for you
Jim Ryun is a 3:51.1 miler on Feb 19, 1971
idiot
he ran it in '67
you clearly have no clue at all about this
This is clear, unambiguous and in the record books. Nobody gives a shit about the guy who coulda woulda shoulda run faster but DID NOT. Nobody needs a physicist you fucking moron
only a moron woud stick his head ( or for you it woud be his ass ) in the sand with that attitude
who isn't interested in what a guy couda run under perfect circumstances ???
tell me here who woudn't want to know what komen couda run for 5k if he'd run that instead of the relatively meaningless distance of 3k in rieti on that day ?
there are tools :
http://www.jundo.co.uk/was he yet in 3'29 shape or still more like a 3'30 or 3'31 guy still in '96 ?
7'20 with
3'30 ->~ 12'37.9
3'31 ->~ 12'35.5
there is a significant non-0 possibilty he couda run in the 12'35s that day & still be 5k wr holder today
idiot
who woudn't be interested in that ???
Ventolin---you do realize that you are insane, don't you? As in clinically insane, should be on major psychiatric medications and locked up in a facility somewhere where you can get the help you need.
?????
Ventolin I think you're a great poster; don't let them bring you down! I suspect many feel this same way!
ventolin^3 wrote:
i don't make up hypothetical nonsensicals
i justify whatever i ascribe
Yes you do and it's all in your own mind.
Seriously? What's wrong with some people?1) It is the current WR.2) It was run during a World Championship FINAL.As far as ventolin^3 is concerned, Quincy and Michael crossed the 100m to go mark at basically the same exact time. Tie goes to the faster guy all around who also managed to run it in a Final. As relevant as your data is sometimes, the problem is you're too much of a troll (which is entertaining in its own right, so keep it up).
track & field wrote:
You're not much of a track and field fan if you only appreciate WR races.
In a way, all 400 races are rabbited. The runners in the inside lanes always have someone to chase after.
ventolin, I did not read much of this thread, because any thread you are involved with turns into an absurdist nightmare.
Let me say this though: for you to unequivocally state that Watts' 43.71 when "easing up" is better than MJ 43.18 is just plain silly. No calculators needed for me to come to that conclusion.
Could Watts have run faster than 43.18 in that race if he ran 100% through the line? Possibly. Can you say for sure??? Absolutely not. As you well should know, athletes do great when relaxed. In a semi, he is relaxed, and when supposedly "easing up", he is actually just relaxing and floating in. Would he have run much faster if he had strained? Probably not. He might have tightened up. When I look at the tape, I see a slight easing up, but not by that much. He lets off the gas really just a touch. If you see more than that, you are welcome to your opinion, but it is pure conjecture. I put him at 43.3 or .4 at best with a harder push at the end in that race. 1/2 second is a LOT at the pace they are running. But you act like he could have shaved over .5 no problem. You are getting carried away (as usual).
And as far as Watts not being "out of breath," big deal. Look at MJ after his 43.18. He is no more out of breath than Watts.
So great race for Watts. But undeniably the "greatest 400 ever" ?? Very unlikely, and pure conjecture on your part
I love me a good Ventolin^3 thread. Time to get some more popcorn.
morire da solo wrote:
Ventolin I think you're a great poster; don't let them bring you down! I suspect many feel this same way!
I think you're in a very small minority there!
He's rude, arrogant, deluded, contradictory, biased and completely mad!
It was so pleasant on here for the last few weeks while he's been away; probably at some clinic somewhere getting treatment); and now he's back to spoil every thread he pollutes with his ramblings.
deanouk wrote:
It was so pleasant on here for the last few weeks while he's been away...and now he's back to spoil every thread he pollutes with his ramblings.
I may not be a member of his fan club either, but let's be fair here: he started this particular thread.
If you have a true problem with him (are we even positive that it's "him" and not "her"?), it would probably be a good idea not to click on threads that he starts...