Cole Hocker will have a hard time beating Sam Ruthe

ggghhhggg wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Since it's being argued here that outdoors is no faster than indoors Hocker is still over two seconds behind Ingebrigtsen. I suppose that's progress. But he is a whole second faster than Kejelcha indoors. That, too, is progress. Of a sort.

As it's also maintained that Hocker loses so many races because he hasn't "peaked" he must have peaked for this race. So maybe he might even win some outdoor DL this year? If he "peaks"?

That's the only scenario when you change your original statement

Hocker has to be slower - for whatever reason - rhan your new friend Ingebrigtsen: so yes, indoors isn't slower anymore

All what you write is based solely on your wishes, not on facts. So, all what you write is completely irrelevant.

Technology is a thing wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Ruthe's indoor time is likely worth 3:46 outdoors. So how much faster than that is Hocker?

No it's not. He ran his indoor 3.48 at the BU track, which is probably faster than most outdoor tracks. As usual, you're out of touch with the modern world.

Armstronglivs wrote:

I didn't claim indoors was as fast as indoors - others did. Keep up.

Armstronglivs wrote:

ggghhhggg wrote:

That's the only scenario when you change your original statement

Hocker has to be slower - for whatever reason - rhan your new friend Ingebrigtsen: so yes, indoors isn't slower anymore

All what you write is based solely on your wishes, not on facts. So, all what you write is completely irrelevant.

I didn't claim indoors was as fast as indoors - others did. Keep up.

But it is a change to see Hocker win. Unless it's a championship final he mostly loses international level races.

Armweaklivs wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I didn't claim indoors was as fast as indoors - others did. Keep up.

No, they didn't. You can't read.

ggghhhggg wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I didn't claim indoors was as fast as indoors - others did. Keep up.

But it is a change to see Hocker win. Unless it's a championship final he mostly loses international level races.

Indoors is as fast as indoors and outdoors is as fast as outdoors. And you are dumb as someone can be.

You said outdoors is 2 seconds faster than indoors in the Mile. This would put Hocker in WR territory. Since Hocker is your new Jakob, this can't be. So you changed your view - for the first time in your letsrun history, DuMb?

Armstronglivs wrote:

This below was one such example of the claim that indoors can be as fast as outdoors posted earlier in the thread. You have certainly carved yourself out a niche as quite the dumbest to ever post here.

"You’ve never run on BU clearly. It’s as fast as racing outdoors due to a bouncy track, generous bank and guaranteed perfect conditions."

So - "as fast as racing outdoors" - you couldn't read that?

It isn't my view, and I never said it was. Go back to school. You missed out on a primary education.

ggghhhggg wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

This below was one such example of the claim that indoors can be as fast as outdoors posted earlier in the thread. You have certainly carved yourself out a niche as quite the dumbest to ever post here.

"You’ve never run on BU clearly. It’s as fast as racing outdoors due to a bouncy track, generous bank and guaranteed perfect conditions."

So - "as fast as racing outdoors" - you couldn't read that?

It isn't my view, and I never said it was. Go back to school. You missed out on a primary education.

YOU, DuMb, said that outdoors is two seconds fsster than indoors.

You changed your view because of Hocker, your new Jakob.

Thousands of posts from you, all completely irrelevant because they only reflect your wishes, not facts.

Armstronglivs wrote:

educated me wrote:

The view is that BU is as fast as racing outdoors, not indoors generally. The vast majority think that BU is faster than other indoor tracks. It's the only indoor track that most people here would put on par with racing outdoors.

Your mistake is taking an opinion about one indoor track and applying it to all indoor tracks.

More selective argument. And speculative, not fact.

Armstronglivs wrote:

ggghhhggg wrote:

YOU, DuMb, said that outdoors is two seconds fsster than indoors.

You changed your view because of Hocker, your new Jakob.

Thousands of posts from you, all completely irrelevant because they only reflect your wishes, not facts.

I haven't changed my view.

Armstronglivs wrote:

ggghhhggg wrote:

YOU, DuMb, said that outdoors is two seconds fsster than indoors.

You changed your view because of Hocker, your new Jakob.

Thousands of posts from you, all completely irrelevant because they only reflect your wishes, not facts.

I haven't changed my view about anything. I have presented arguments you can't follow. That isn't a change either.

educated me wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

More selective argument. And speculative, not fact.

You took a statement about one indoor track and you generalized it to all indoor tracks.

Copestronglivs wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I haven't changed my view about anything. I have presented arguments you can't follow. That isn't a change either.

You are right. No one can follow your aeguments because they make no sense.

the dishonest dumber wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I haven't changed my view.

You did.

Armstronglivs wrote:

the dishonest dumber wrote:

You did.

No, I haven't. I was basing an argument on claims made by others. But you were too thick to realize that.

Armstronglivs wrote:

More selective argument. And speculative, not fact.