Come on, you literally laughed out loud when you wrote "I never started the lies and deflections."!
Your lies just in that post I was citing before include "one of several things that were wrong about this case", "testimony that was inexplicably limited to pork meat and stomach", plus all the deflections about 130 ng/ml, "as little as half an ounce (14 grams)", Chorizo and what not.
I just explained to you, again, that there was nothing "inexplicable" about that testimony, and now you are doubling down again on your stupid lie.
Try to understand this: Shelburrito claimed offal from a specific food truck. As "specific and concrete elements", she provided to AIU/WA/CAS the invoice over pork stomach and meat as ingredients. To her credit, and to your dismay and discredit, she never ever claimed that her offal included any nandrolone-rich ingredients such as testicles. Facts are facts. Therefore the expert testimony was logically "limited to pork meat and stomach".
This case is about a specific food truck serving a specific offal with specific ingredients, namely "pork meat and stomach", as you put it. Whatever else you may find on the internet is completely irrelevant here.
Try to let this sink in from the independent scientist Tucker, here on letsrun, where he clearly explains why:
"So yes, based on what we see in the Reasoned Decision, it’s a pretty clear case."
Finally, you are not citing Tygart with the unsubstantiated "he's more skeptical...". You are citing a BTC/Nike fan paraphrasing what Tygart allegedly said (note the "he"). His "by the book(s)" on the other hand is straight from his mouth, however, very much to your dismay and discredit.