GettingFasterDude wrote:
Did I miss something? What's the injury? Maybe I missed it, but why the need to announce the injury, but conceal what the injury is?
In every other pro sport, when someone is sidelined by injury, they announce what it is ("hamstring" "Turf toe" etc) and list their status, "injured reserve," "day to day," etc.
Even Kipchoge, after his 8th place a few years ago at London, quickly disclosed his ear issue. There's no tactical reason to keep the injury secret after the race is over. What's the reason in this case?
I don’t know why people care so much about Hocker not doing a post-race interview or the details about his injury. For me, the story begins and ends with him not qualifying for the final and that it will be 2 years before he can race against the best in the world in a race that matters.