Dan would let his kids die so he could make a thread about a "woke hospital"
-
42
-
rojo wrote:
Paradoxical wrote:
As much as I can't stand covid lunacy and stupidity, this is one of those exceptions where I have to side with restrictions. The science is pretty clear that contracting covid from an organ transplant increases one's risk of death from 15-30% so the restriction in this case makes sense.
However if the kid dies from being unable to find a kidney, then the doctors would have blood on their hands.
I don't get it. Can you explain to me why anyone would get Covid from an organ transplant?
Wouldn't the dad get tested for Covid right before giving the organ? Are the tests not accurate? If they aren't, couldn't you require him to do two weeks in isolation before the transplant? Have the dad check into the hospital for two weeks, never leave, and then give up the organ so you know he doesn't have it.
I 100% understand the logic as to why hospitals are requiring the recipients to be vaxxed. Organs are very rare. You don't want to waste them. But in this case, I don't agree at all.
1. It's basically a private transaction between a father and son.
2. If you don't take the dad's organ, the kid is going to have to get it somewhere so you will have one less life saving organ out there.
It isn't completely a private transaction unless the family is paying all hospital charges and professional fees out of pocket. Hospitals and insurance companies have rules to reduce waste of resources. So if they think there is an increased risk of failure due to the lack of vaccination, that is their choice (assuming the insurance coverage is written to give the company that latitude).
22 -
ThatsDrtoYou wrote:
Dan would let his kids die so he could make a thread about a "woke hospital"
A hospital will let a kid die to prop up the Covid Jab narrative.
Disgusting.
39 -
rojo wrote:
Paradoxical wrote:
As much as I can't stand covid lunacy and stupidity, this is one of those exceptions where I have to side with restrictions. The science is pretty clear that contracting covid from an organ transplant increases one's risk of death from 15-30% so the restriction in this case makes sense.
However if the kid dies from being unable to find a kidney, then the doctors would have blood on their hands.
I don't get it. Can you explain to me why anyone would get Covid from an organ transplant?
Wouldn't the dad get tested for Covid right before giving the organ? Are the tests not accurate? If they aren't, couldn't you require him to do two weeks in isolation before the transplant? Have the dad check into the hospital for two weeks, never leave, and then give up the organ so you know he doesn't have it.
I 100% understand the logic as to why hospitals are requiring the recipients to be vaxxed. Organs are very rare. You don't want to waste them. But in this case, I don't agree at all.
1. It's basically a private transaction between a father and son.
2. If you don't take the dad's organ, the kid is going to have to get it somewhere so you will have one less life saving organ out there.
Or die, which will be the fault of the dad.
31 -
carmine9 wrote:
ThatsDrtoYou wrote:
Dan would let his kids die so he could make a thread about a "woke hospital"
A hospital will let a kid die to prop up the Covid Jab narrative.
Disgusting.
too late copy cat. Hospitals have ethics, Dan does not
33 -
Dr. Bob Bratton wrote:
Or die, which will be the fault of the dad.
Looking forward to the Nuremberg 2.0 trial for crimes against humanity, for pushing experimental "vaccines," Dr. Bob Bratton?
23 -
A perfect match can probably be found on the scrap heap.
21 -
DanM wrote:
A perfect match can probably be found on the scrap heap.
Maybe an expert like you or carmine9 can grab one and do the surgery.
12 -
SeattleSilver wrote:
DanM wrote:
A perfect match can probably be found on the scrap heap.
Maybe an expert like you or carmine9 can grab one and do the surgery.
I posted that link as suggested reading. Are donated kidneys being wasted ? Perhaps a real expert (not you) has the answer.
22 -
ThatsDrtoYou wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
A hospital will let a kid die to prop up the Covid Jab narrative.
Disgusting.
too late copy cat. Hospitals have ethics, Dan does not
Letting kid die is ethics?
23 -
carmine9 wrote:
ThatsDrtoYou wrote:
too late copy cat. Hospitals have ethics, Dan does not
Letting kid die is ethics?
00 -
Man trusts doctors to transplant a kidney into his child but does not trust doctors when they recommend vaccines.
84 -
carmine9 wrote:
Nustack McGee wrote:
The crazy part of this is that there is such an easy and simple solution for the family, but the dad is choosing against helping his son, right?
I mean, if you are thinking logically and you have all of the information that we all have, what choice would a logical person make:
1. Take the (extreme, lol, not) risk of getting vaccinated where something (absolutely nothing) negative might happen to you?
2. Let your son suffer kidney disease?
Out of hundreds of millions of vaccinations, how many instances of a negative side effect have there been? What is the likelihood of surviving kidney disease without a transplant? I guess everyone has their own right to interpret statistics any way they choose, but according to math and science there is a right way and a wrong way.
Simpler solution.
Do the transplant without mandating the jab.
That's not one of the options.
42 -
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
Man trusts doctors to transplant a kidney into his child but does not trust doctors when they recommend vaccines.
This "father" did not trust doctors in 2018. He declined giving his son a kidney back then. This father is using the vaccine excuse to shame someone into giving away a kidney to his son. That way the father doesn't have to give away one of his to save his son's life.
31 -
Nustack McGee wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Simpler solution.
Do the transplant without mandating the jab.
That's not one of the options.
The father can travel to a country that will allow the transplant. Trouble is, dad doesn't want to give away one of his kidneys. So, traveling is out of the question.
11 -
The doctor quacks treat boy's kidney for many years.
The kidney is destroyed by the doctors and their terrible treatments.
The greedy doctors want to transplant a kidney to replace the one they've destroyed.
What is continuing to happen to the boy and his kidney is the fault of the doctors, not the dad.
26 -
working_dc_runnermom wrote:
I’m UNBELIEVABLY shook that this dad decided to publicize his selfishness for the whole world to see.
Every time you Google this guys name - “Dad won’t get vaccine to save son”.
The most pathetic self-own of all time.
42 -
So....there's any easy solution here. Get a small poke. End of controversy.
51 -
working_dc_runnermom wrote:
So presumably he'll have to get the kidney from someone who died, meaning there will be 1 less kidney out there. Ridiculous.
They're piling up plates on both sides of this Idiocy Buffet.
The headline might also have read "Dad won't get vaccinated so his 9-year old son can get a kidney transplant".
33 -
I’m triple jabbed and generally support legitimate anti-covid measures but the amount of ridiculous/virtue-signaling policies (have to enter a crowded bar with a mask on then can immediately take it off) and situations like this where there is a very easy work-around are ludicrous.
41
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.