Blessing Okabare 10.62!!!!!!! (+2.7)

Sprintgeezer wrote:

aethsn wrote:

And you know for a fact that an aging sprinter who has made the biggest improvement on her best time in 8 years and is now only second fastest to Flojo can't be doping. What were you saying about bullcr*p?

Were you ever a sprinter?

Have you coached sprinters from a young age to masters ranks?

You haven't. You are ignorant and a nuisance.

And you are totally dishonest because you are ignoring the wind and the possibility that the reading might even be incorrect.

This Armstronglivs poster is a classic piece of crap moran, who accuses people of doing exactly that which he does himself.

But does he ever take a look in the mirror? Hell no. Either he understands exactly what he’s doing and is just an argumentative a-hole, or he’s an oblivious self-absorbed moran. I choose the latter, as he hasn’t proven himself smart enough to be the former.

In any case, he is best ignored because no matter what you say to that kind of person, you will be met with the same type of merely vexatious hypocrisy that does nothing to advance a discussion. After all, that is not his aim.

Do not fall into his trap. Do not respond to his posts. Freeze him out. He is a dead end, and a total waste of time. Even if you agree that all these sprinters are doped and you are adamantly against doping, understand that he actually does your cause a grave disservice by bringing it into disrepute, by posing as someone who is after fairness and justice—when in reality he is simply a petulant and judgmental child.

He is not on your side, he is on his own side. Alone.[/quote]

Not quite on my own. It appears I have WADA and the IOC on my side. You?

You have embarrassed yourself here. Bless you. I mean Blessing.

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

Armstronglivs wrote:

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

Take a well-earned bow, you deserve it. I hope SprintGeezer and friends will be posting soon to apologize.

This Armstronglivs dude is a classic piece of work who constantly accuses record-setting athletes and other standout performers of doping. I recommend that pro athletes should stop proving him right.

Armstronglivs wrote:

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

It is racist for you to accuse her of testing positive for HGH, there is no basis in reality for this claim you make, whatsoever!

Armstronglivs wrote:

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

What do you have to say about Shelby huh?

TBH, this is another obvious doper caught that tends to disprove the thesis that EVERYBODY dopes.

Hopefully Katir is next.

Down goes Okagbare, oy

zxcvczxv wrote:

Sprintgeezer wrote:

Funny all this suggestion that BO is using—I have always thought that if anybody at the top was clean, it would be her, and that she would be one of the very fastest clean 100m women in history.

That is one reason why I am disinclined to believe the time, or to discount it because of the stronger wind.

This looks bad now that she's tested positive for human growth hormone, but it looked bad when you wrote it. I'm really surprised actually that you did because there was barely any other runner who looked more like a doper or non-xy athlete than Blessings Okagbare, and you are known to be skeptical of every sprinter below a certain time.

I said the same thing about her as I said about Gay: that IF any were clean, I could see it being her. IF I had believed that 10.6 time (which I still don’t), then I would have concluded that she was using. Yes, IMO anybody below a certain time is using—9.80 or better for men, and not sure where for women, but def 10.6 is below it. Statistically it is effectively a certainty.

Armstrong’s “analysis” is still crap. I still don’t believe that time. And as far as having the hgh look, I know several Nigerian chicks who have it.

In any case, down goes Okagbare. Great, hope to never see her again, either. She is a money-grubbing egomaniac. Money is the root of much of this—remove it, and the athletes don’t care as much. They get full of themselves.

Talking about egomaniacs… can you just admit you were wrong??

Can’t you fvcking read? I’m not wrong, because I didn’t say stupid shlt. I have been wrong twice, that I can remember—Lawson, sort of; and a Jamaican guy who never broke 10, I forget his name atm.

king kimetto wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

Take a well-earned bow, you deserve it. I hope SprintGeezer and friends will be posting soon to apologize.

Well-earned bow? Lol

When you acuse every fast athlete of doping you are bound to get a few "right" every year.

Sprintgeezer wrote:

Funny all this suggestion that BO is using—I have always thought that if anybody at the top was clean, it would be her, and that she would be one of the very fastest clean 100m women in history.

That is one reason why I am disinclined to believe the time, or to discount it because of the stronger wind.

boom. most epic fail to armstronglivs ever seen.

Apologize, LMAO. For what, hurting his feelings by pointing out that he’s an idiot?

NOBODY is more notorious here than I am, for pointing fingers at suspicious sprinters. The difference here is that I didn’t see any good reason to believe the 10.62 without confirmation—and I still don’t. She hasn’t come close to it.

And I would use it only as a cornerstone. Note that I haven’t really said much about Bromell—he’s strongly on the radar, but only that, because of that 9.80 and the suspect 9.77. Right on the line, because of the possibility of the new Eugene track being abnormally fast. More would need to be indicated for it to be a slam dunk.

But for the facile and shallow, like Armstrong, lack of depth is no barrier to blurting bullshlt.

Pupil man, I thought that at least YOU could read.😔

SG, the nz nutter business and you saying you thought she was clean aside, why are you so suspicis of the time?

I dont know anything about setting a track meet up, but do know a tiny bit about timing gates etc and would have though it was exceptionally difficult to set up a timing system that was only wrong by a little bit. total failure is one thing, wildy innacurate another, but to have a system that is incorrect but plausible would take design or complete idiocy i would have thought.

arent there companies that build and provide such equipment? isnt it easy to install and vuirtualy impossible to install 'a little bit wrong'.

i dont know, maybe you do, so i am asking.

Nope... wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

This thread has been a roll-call of stupidity and ignorance from the doping deniers. Blessing has proven them all wrong.

What do you have to say about Shelby huh?

I said the same - that she is a doper - before she was busted, if you revisit that thread.

How not to admit you were wrong.

ImpaIa31 wrote:

king kimetto wrote:

Take a well-earned bow, you deserve it. I hope SprintGeezer and friends will be posting soon to apologize.

Well-earned bow? Lol

When you acuse every fast athlete of doping you are bound to get a few "right" every year.

I said Okagbare was doping. You missed that bit. Like you do.