I've been banned a few times for "spamming" although I have never done so. Unless the definition of "spamming" is responding quickly to multiple threads. If you are sharp witted or have expertise/opinions about multiple topics during a visit to LRC, then you are a spammer.
Mikeh33 wrote:
The mods just took down a thread I started, in which I linked to a lawyer discussing the Minnesota shooting in detail. It was deemed “low of no content.”
Here are some examples of threads that meet the moderators content standards.
Saw a guy rubbing his girlfriend leg at a party. He did it for an hour straightPeople that name their child after themselves. Extremely weird.
Songs about/mention farm animals
your thread may have been deleted because there is already one thread discussing that topic, the Minnesota atrocity committed by ICE and backed up by the current Administration.
Who cares. It's a crap forum full of losers.
HolterSkolter wrote:
lock instead of delete wrote:
Other message boards I post on will lock a thread to replies instead of outright deleting it unless there is something incredibly inflammatory in the OP. That allows the moderator to leave a post saying "this thread has been locked because ________." The thread then dies, but there is an explanation for it being locked.
I like this, and I think that LR should lock threads instead of deleting them when possible.
I like this idea. But it doesnt address the issue of thousands of individual posts getting deleted just because a mod doesnt agree.
Won\'t get fooled again wrote:
I always post to keep it on the 'crete. Not sure if this violates terms of service.
14 posts were removed from this page.