Gidey just ran the single greatest female running performance ever... Give her the black page! Letesenbet MF Gidey 1:02:52

letsdrum wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You aren't interested in the views of someone you label as arrogant and ignorant - so I won't bother to discuss mine with you. But you simply cannot stop making me the subject of your every post. There are no limits to your obsession. But it is all really about you.

That you don't give answers to such questions has nothing to do with my "obsession" .

You constantly claim that any great results are from doped athletes. But when confronted with concrete questions you just run away.

Very rarely you respond something substantial to points you were asked ("there are no points", "you are obsessed"...).

And by such an amount of opposition anybody should show some self-critisism.

Yet again your post is about me. They always are. It is almost amusing that you are unaware of this obsession.

liar soorer wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

That you don't give answers to such questions has nothing to do with my "obsession" .

You constantly claim that any great results are from doped athletes. But when confronted with concrete questions you just run away.

Very rarely you respond something substantial to points you were asked ("there are no points", "you are obsessed"...).

And by such an amount of opposition anybody should show some self-critisism.

He only posts to irritate; he is proud to assert this.

Now contaminating the NCAA swimmer thread .

It is only a latrine when you are present.

Armstronglivs wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

He only posts to irritate; he is proud to assert this.

Now contaminating the NCAA swimmer thread .

It is only a latrine when you are present.

Away with you.

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

That you don't give answers to such questions has nothing to do with my "obsession" .

You constantly claim that any great results are from doped athletes. But when confronted with concrete questions you just run away.

Very rarely you respond something substantial to points you were asked ("there are no points", "you are obsessed"...).

And by such an amount of opposition anybody should show some self-critisism.

Yet again your post is about me. They always are. It is almost amusing that you are unaware of this obsession.

Go away

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

That you don't give answers to such questions has nothing to do with my "obsession" .

You constantly claim that any great results are from doped athletes. But when confronted with concrete questions you just run away.

Very rarely you respond something substantial to points you were asked ("there are no points", "you are obsessed"...).

And by such an amount of opposition anybody should show some self-critisism.

Yet again your post is about me. They always are. It is almost amusing that you are unaware of this obsession.

Because you don't want to answer (it would weaken your point of view) you constantly change the subject.

According to you, any great performance is from a doped athlete. Can you list a few clean performances? What are the fastest possible times?

letsdrum wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Yet again your post is about me. They always are. It is almost amusing that you are unaware of this obsession.

Because you don't want to answer (it would weaken your point of view) you constantly change the subject.

According to you, any great performance is from a doped athlete. Can you list a few clean performances? What are the fastest possible times?

You're asking the wrong person these questions. You need to ask them of yourself.

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

Because you don't want to answer (it would weaken your point of view) you constantly change the subject.

According to you, any great performance is from a doped athlete. Can you list a few clean performances? What are the fastest possible times?

You're asking the wrong person these questions. You need to ask them of yourself.

Just go far fear away

liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You're asking the wrong person these questions. You need to ask them of yourself.

Just go far fear away

I fear not.

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

Because you don't want to answer (it would weaken your point of view) you constantly change the subject.

According to you, any great performance is from a doped athlete. Can you list a few clean performances? What are the fastest possible times?

You're asking the wrong person these questions. You need to ask them of yourself.

But you are the one who constantly posts in dozens of threads about some great performance the athlete is doped, not me. So I'm not asking the wrong person.

I don't know what is humanly possible, so I don't accuse someone to be a doped without any proof.

Armstronglivs wrote:

liar soorer wrote:

Just go far fear away

I fear not.

You detected the error - we're all impressed.

letsdrum wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You're asking the wrong person these questions. You need to ask them of yourself.

But you are the one who constantly posts in dozens of threads about some great performance the athlete is doped, not me. So I'm not asking the wrong person.

I don't know what is humanly possible, so I don't accuse someone to be a doped without any proof.

So your post is all about me again. It never stops with you. You might ask yourself why my opinions matter that much to you. Being differed with appears to be intolerable to you.

letsdrum wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I fear not.

You detected the error - we're all impressed.

You would be. You never see your own.

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

But you are the one who constantly posts in dozens of threads about some great performance the athlete is doped, not me. So I'm not asking the wrong person.

I don't know what is humanly possible, so I don't accuse someone to be a doped without any proof.

So your post is all about me again. It never stops with you. You might ask yourself why my opinions matter that much to you. Being differed with appears to be intolerable to you.

Just answering the question - not possible for you?

You have said I need to ask the question myself and I just showed you why this is not true. Claryfying mistakes in a thread is not "all about you".

It's really easy to just ignore certain posters or to use simple browser add-ons to block posts from them. It makes LRC a much more enjoyable experience.

letsdrum wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So your post is all about me again. It never stops with you. You might ask yourself why my opinions matter that much to you. Being differed with appears to be intolerable to you.

Just answering the question - not possible for you?

You have said I need to ask the question myself and I just showed you why this is not true. Claryfying mistakes in a thread is not "all about you".

It is, because you insist that I have to respond to you. So in the end it is all about you after all.

2600 bro wrote:

It's really easy to just ignore certain posters or to use simple browser add-ons to block posts from them. It makes LRC a much more enjoyable experience.

But they don't want to do that. They are obsessed with certain posters.

So you don't want to answer the question (and many others)? Because you don't have to do so? You are free to answer what ever question you want, for sure. But why are you posting at all always such strong claims, if you don't want to explain your position?

2600 bro wrote:

It's really easy to just ignore certain posters or to use simple browser add-ons to block posts from them. It makes LRC a much more enjoyable experience.

What is a browser add on? Thanks

Armstronglivs wrote:

letsdrum wrote:

Just answering the question - not possible for you?

You have said I need to ask the question myself and I just showed you why this is not true. Claryfying mistakes in a thread is not "all about you".

It is, because you insist that I have to respond to you. So in the end it is all about you after all.

Go away