Parker Valby is the most talented girl in the country

Yawn again. If you find any major pr spikes since Tuohy started breaking records in 7th grade, odd performance patterns, questionable associations, etc., be sure to let us know. If she runs 14:40 this upcoming season then get back to us. If she is healthy I'm thinking low 15:00s in a fast race.

I see signs of obvious doping. It's some of the posters here. What else could explain their fixation on tarring one or more student athletes with PED use, without actual EVIDENCE of PED use? And all the comments about the appearance of the bodies of these student athletes are not only despicable, but also based only on the posters' superficial opinion of photos and therefore BS. Your vision is faulty. If a runner is fast, then fast can look like that.

Are you saying that she continued to run on a bum knee for two years before taking care of it, potentially sacrificing her career for good, in the process?

If tendonitis is a "bum knee" then I guess so. I believe that is what I read it was. But I could have that wrong.

I knew their was something on Instagram from 2020...this is shortly after the supposed major surgery.

bardoniapt
@katelyntuohy crushed her workouts here at Bardonia, working on her posterior chain activation as well her lateral plane propulsion. Good luck down at NC State!
#bardoniapt #physicaltherapy #monroeny #newcityny #rocklandcounty #exercisemotivation #fitnessgoals #training #trainingmotivation #ncstate #crosscountryrunning #trackandfield

This isn’t baseball bub. Knee surgery ain’t no tommy john

I did read carefully. In a response to Armstrong, you wrote this:

”You just want to believe that most top level athletes are clean. It's not true.”

That means that you believe that most top level athletes are not clean.

A few more pages back, you stated that you believe that Valby is a doper.

Perhaps you can’t remember what you have written.

makes sense. sounds like she had a bummy knee her entire senior season.

Do you mean like Tuohy? You seem to be trying to do your best impression of me, with your consistent doping denial.

What I haven't seen from you are the "known facts".

You do realize that this knee argument you’re using to insinuate that Tuohy is a doper is actually doing more to strengthen the argument that she isn’t a doper, right?

If she was starting to, as you have said, plateau, that is probably indicative that he knee was hindering her performances. The knee thing had already “popped up” when she was plateauing and “going backwards.”

More than like her knee surgery was done via arthroscopy. Arthroscopic knee surgeries have fast recovery times. It makes absolutely total sense that after a good training block, done post-procedure, that she would be stronger and better.

She almost missed the 2018 nxn race due to the injury issue cropping up. Even afterward she continued to put up really strong times and set records until the spring on 2020, at which point she had surgery. When you look back her explosiveness started to come back only at the end of 2021, so a year and a half to full recovery.

Ok since I'm done with this discussion now, I'll let you in on a little secret: I was not seriously arguing that either athlete is a doper. I was pointing out that Armstrongliv's "criteria" for inferring doping are so general that it could be applied to any top level athlete, even Tuohy. There is no more evidence of Valby doping than there is of Tuohy (who is faster than Valby). So, does that make sense now? I was applying his argument to one of his favorite athletes to prove a point. I thought it was fairly obvious.

Ok since you are still too dense to understand, I will try to help you out this last time. I was extending another poster's absurd criteria for Valby doping to Tuohy to prove how ridiculously vague these criteria are. Nothing I said was true. I am playing a character. Some would call it "satire". I see you take everything you read literally. Don't do that.

Ok this is really the last response from me, just to help you understand. You seem to need the help. The answer to your bolded (misspelled) question is "no". Does that clear things up for you?