Finally...Unequivocal Proof That the Apollo Moon Landings Were Staged on Earth

Elaborate...I have no idea what you're talking about? 🤔

The moon hoax crowd needs to explain this key element on how we saw Armstrong, Aldrin & Collins lift off in a Saturn V rocket from Cape Canaveral.

About a week later the re-entry module enters the Earth's atmosphere & splashes down in the Pacific Ocean where the astronauts are recoverd by the Naval carrier team.

We see our heros Armstrong, Aldrin & Collins exit the module & assisted into the rescue boat by the Naval frogmen.

And who could forget that glorious moment aboard the Carrier where Armstrong, Aldrin & Collins as well as the entire crew are all bowed down in a moment of silence as the entire world looks on....so epic! 🙌

So, moon hoaxers - you got some explaining to do on this instead of always harping about the Van Allen belt. 😉

Because perception matters. There was no point continuing a race to set foot on the moon if 1. someone else had landed on the moon or 2. someone else had sufficiently fooled public opinion that they had landed on the moon.

I am not going to read 34 pages on this. However, what I question more is:

Why did it suddenly stop? Twelve people walked on the moon. It stopped in 1972. No one has done it since. Why? 1972 is a long time ago.

The videos are obviously fake. The guys that fall and then get yanked straight back up is hilarious.

The pics are great too. Sheeting being held on with scotch tape is rich. Like one of my kids made it.

No disruption whatsoever in the powdery, ash-like surface directly under the engines… derp, how did they slow the lander on landing with the engines off?

Then there’s the lack of stars and the obvious multiple light sources casting shadows in different directions. Opps, forgot we only had the sun’s light to work with.

Then there’s the fact that NASA can’t find any of the telemetry data from ANY of the missions… and they don’t seem to care about this.

Remember how the US was supposed to be going back by now? Turns out the spacesuits don’t work and they need several more years to work it out… but 55 years ago the canvas suits worked just fine.

The final nail in the coffin for me is after supposedly traveling there so easily, using early 1960s technology, that they could bring a dune buggy and zip around and play golf, nobody has even attempted going again for 50 years.

I suspect if they do go back they will go to the old landing sites to fake all the evidence for when other humans actually start to arrive.

Nice find.

Stanley Kubrik was played by actor Tom Mayk in a 2015 film written and directed by T. Patrick Murray.

Much easier to film a fake interview, than to film fake moon landings. Any budding film student can do it.

imdb.com

Shooting Stanley Kubrick (2015) - IMDb

Shooting Stanley Kubrick: Directed by T. Patrick Murray. With Tom Mayk. Before his death, Stanley Kubrick granted a rare interview to an unknown filmmaker, where he surprised the young director- and the world- by admitting hi...

Link:www.imdb.com/title/tt12008602/?ref_=tt...

Do you think you are the first one in this thread to bring up the Van Allen Belts?

To avoid the radiation, NASA planned a route that went around the inner belt, and then quickly flew through the edge of the outer belt. The astronauts wore radiation dosimeters that confirmed the total radiation exposure was low.

Since we live on a circle, we're always runnin' up/down hill... which is why none of our times are legal. We a bunch of damn cheators.

If the Soviet Union could have proven that the landings were fake, it would have been the greatest publicity coup of the 20th century for them. They could have sent up probes showing there was no craters or flags at the areas the Apollo crews touched down on. With their intelligence network at the time, it's hard to see how they could have not known it was staged. Look at how closely embedded US spies are in Russia today. They know whenever Putin takes a dump.

The Soviets could of course have staged it themselves just as easily, or more easily, given their closed society compared to US society.

Was supersonic flight a conspiracy? Have you ever met anybody who actually flew on a concorde? London to New York in under 3 hours in 1969, and 8 hours in 2023?? You're aving a laugh aintcha?

Checkmate, mo(r)ons.

en.wikipedia.org

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment

Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) is the practice of measuring the distance between the surfaces of the Earth and the Moon using laser ranging. The distance can be calculated from the round-trip time of laser light pulses travelling...

Link:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Rang...

Why the stop? Because we beat the Russians there. Pretty much the whole reason we were going to the moon to begin with, Cold War, you know. Now, we're going back to start to hopefully use the moon as a waystation to Mars.

These threads are One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest. The madness that is America today.

Correct. We were monitoring all the missions and as soon as the radar data showed that the Apollo was put on the Earth-Moon trajectory, all the doubts vanished in the haze. Also, it was crystal clear to all space experts that having such a payload capability (sent to the Moon) the landing and return was quite doable with technologies available at those days.

You seem not to understand the meaning of the word 'or'.

Or maybe you do! I am not really saying it happened - or not. But no, I don't think supersonic flight is a conspiracy.

How did they get past the firmament?

1) It was very expensive

2) There was no commercial benefit

3) The public was bored after the 2nd or 3rd landing

Really, this isn't hard.

Indeed.

I often wonder if anyone on these threads actually believes that we did not land on the Moon in 1969 - 1972. Or if everyone making such claims is actually a troll. It is hard to tell sometimes.

Your indoctrination denies physics. Explain to all of us how sound travels in a vacuum.

On page 9 of this thread, I posted this (regarding RF transmission)- NASA got caught hoaxing AGAIN. Explain to us how RF travels faster than the speed of light?

There is approx a 2.6 sec delay that has never been accounted for between the ACTORnots and Houston Control.

Per NASA, the Moon is about 240,000 miles away.

RF travels at 186,282 miles/second.

240000/186282 = 1.29 seconds (represents the audio/visual transmission delay in one direction)

1.29 X 2 = 2.58 seconds (represents the delay for a two-way transmission)

Here is the original audio footage of Neil Armstrong making his famous line.

At the 15 sec mark, we hear: "Columbia, Columbia this is Houston AOS, over"

Then, after barely a 1 second pause, we hear: "Houston, Columbia on the high gain, over"

Busted!! The pause should have been 2.58 seconds at minimum. That's 1.29 seconds to go out and 1.29 seconds for it to come back, if the "actornot" replied instantly. Amazing how the laws of physics have been broken. RF cannot travel faster than the speed of light. The lack of delay means that these "actornots" were right here safe on Earth the whole time. Just more evidence that the Moon landing was faked.

NASA then, ALTERED the tapes at a later date to try to "correct" them for the audio delay...Now, why would they do that??? You NASA trolls can scream all day/night, but the laws of physics cannot be changed. The speed of light in a vacuum did not magically and suddenly speed up for the Apollo missions. NASA lied, get over it.

You NASA/Apollo believers are more indoctrinated than a Scientologist.

Is the second message is a direct response to the first one? There is no indication that Columbia intended that statement to be an aquisition of signal acknowlegement

You're belief in NASA is clouding your judgment and denying physics. Again, how does sound travel in vacuum???? Go listen the the first video where the actorNOT is using a hammer.