Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

kibitzer wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So Tiny thinks that our troops took over airports during the American Revolution:

Does anyone still believe he should be president?

Wait--FT. MCHENRY? That was the War of 1812, not the Revolutionary War!

Once again, y'all don't understand. The hardcore Trumpers tend (no, not all--it's a tendency) to be people who didn't necessarily do very well in school, and your fancy-pants insistence on "facts" and "reasoning" will simply make them double down. A discussion like this will make them *more* likely to vote for him again.

Just sayin'... wrote:

kibitzer wrote:

Wait--FT. MCHENRY? That was the War of 1812, not the Revolutionary War!

Once again, y'all don't understand. The hardcore Trumpers tend (no, not all--it's a tendency) to be people who didn't necessarily do very well in school, and your fancy-pants insistence on "facts" and "reasoning" will simply make them double down. A discussion like this will make them *more* likely to vote for him again.

I get that for the Ft. McHenry part.

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

Fat hurts wrote:

I get that for the Ft. McHenry part.

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

Ya'll fancy pants elitists

Fat hurts wrote:

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

Not a chance. You (and other informed, intelligent people on this thread) *still* don't get it.

Fat hurts wrote:

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

This is just complete insanity.

Dan Quayle couldn't spell "potato" and we all labeled him as an idiot. He is Einstein compared to Trump.

We look to leaders to lead. There is a minimum level of intelligence and knowledge that should be required of the person who runs our country. Donald Trump doesn't come close to meeting what that would be. Only stupid people would continue to support him after all we now know about him.

I continue to maintain that there are only two kinds (non-elected officials) people who support Donald Trump at this point:

1) JUST stupid.

2) Racist.

If he can't grasp something as simple as the fact there were no airports in 1775, how the hell can anyone expect him to grasp really anything else?

You Trump supporters should be ashamed of yourselves. I'm not sure stupid or racist people can feel shame, but you should.

Independent,

Answer me two questions honestly:

Do you still believe Trump?

Do you think he is as honest as the average politician?

Just sayin'... wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

Not a chance. You (and other informed, intelligent people on this thread) *still* don't get it.

I suppose the out there is that Fat Hurts said "hard-core Trumpers". What's the definition of that? Someone who never wavers no matter what? Now, if the definition is NOT that, then Fat Hurts has a point of course. There are already a lot of people who were solidly on the Trump wagon in 2016 who have said they will not vote for him again. Very few people have gone the other way, and he really can't afford to lose really any votes.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Just sayin'... wrote:

kibitzer wrote:

Wait--FT. MCHENRY? That was the War of 1812, not the Revolutionary War!

Once again, y'all don't understand. The hardcore Trumpers tend (no, not all--it's a tendency) to be people who didn't necessarily do very well in school, and your fancy-pants insistence on "facts" and "reasoning" will simply make them double down. A discussion like this will make them *more* likely to vote for him again.

It's not about changing anyone's vote. It's about ensuring they stay home and your voters go vote. A lot of folks don't vote every 4 yrs. That's all driven by motivation.

Trump was the first TV star president....Obama was the first black president....Bush was HW's son.....Clinton was the underdog on Arsenio Hall....

It's never about policy. It's always about the intangibles. The same thing that elected him in 2016 will ensure his defeat in 2020.

Alan

Just sayin'... wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

But "took over the airports"? Surely that's got to make even hard-core Trumpers stop and pause.

Not a chance. You (and other informed, intelligent people on this thread) *still* don't get it.

Did he say whether he has been to all 57 states yet?

It's the economy, you stupid dems pieces of trash.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/jobs-report-june-2019.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Dems lose again wrote:

It's the economy, you stupid dems pieces of trash.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/jobs-report-june-2019.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Just shows you how horrible he is. He won't win even with arguably the best economy in my lifetime.

Give him a break. He didn't discuss the important role of the space force in that war.

Ha!

He's a 5-year-old.

LOL. Good one.

Tiny just told reporters that the error was due to a blackout of the teleprompter.

I think he should have gone with, "My speechwriters were drunk."

It's only a hat, you dems pieces of trash.

https://bit.ly/2XIjzD1

tysonssock wrote:

Independent,

Answer me two questions honestly:

Do you still believe Trump?

Do you think he is as honest as the average politician?

As honesy as the average politician? No way!

He is the most honest president since Abe Lincoln! He speaks his mind.

Dems lose again wrote:

It's only a hat, you dems pieces of trash.

https://bit.ly/2XIjzD1

It's a racist symbol. If you see someone wearing that hat, you immediately assume they are racist.

Sorry, but that's what the hat has become.

Dems lose again wrote:

It's only a hat, you dems pieces of trash.

https://bit.ly/2XIjzD1

Yes, a Trump Dunce Cap. So obvious.

Fat hurts wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I will "half-eat" some crow here. I went looking for the original citation showing 20% of O2 is created in the Amazon. While I found lots and lots of articles that repeat this, the original citation could not be found.

I'll spit out some of that crow.

I did find a scholarly article stating that the Amazon is responsible for 15% of global terrestrial photosynthesis. By "terrestrial", I'm pretty sure he means "on land" rather than "on earth". So it appears that 20% of all O2 production is not possible. But 15% of all terrestrial plant-based O2 production is still a pretty large amount.

And there are plenty of scholarly articles to back up everything else I've been saying.

Gonna help you out here - assuming that increasing your level of understanding is of any interest to you.

1) Actually, your earlier understanding of the amount of photosynthesis taking place in the Amazon was correct. Roughly 15 - 20% of the photosynthesis taking place on planet Earth (oceans included) IS taking place in the Amazon. The oceans account for 50+%, perhaps as much as 75%. The Amazon accounts for roughly half of that taking place on land.

2) This statement of yours: " That the Amazon also consumes O2 is irrelevant because the Amazon is not a closed system. Whether it consumes roughly the same amount of O2 as it produces is also irrelevant." remains astonishingly ignorant. What IS true is that the Amazon contributes exactly the same amount of oxygen to the rest of Earth as the Sahara desert - Zero.