Skinny tough guy get his ass kicked on camera!!!

J.R. wrote:

zserg wrote:

Hey J.R,, do you work for Fox news, or are you a huge fan of Roseanne Rosanadanna?

No, I never watch the news and don't have any heros on tv.

Let's say you see a small woman turn around and slap a big husky guy in the face. The man responds by picking up the woman above his head, slams her face down into the pavement, and casually walks away.

Her fault???? Anyone who thinks so is an idiot.

The fact is the kid was no threat and caused no damage.

The husky brute was a huge threat and did cause damage to the kid.

People need to be held accountable when they cause damage to others.

Terrible, convoluted comparison. The "husky brute" was clearly bullied/provoked by a little sh!t stain who was being egged on by his sycophant peers. Just because you happen to be small doesn't give you the right to prove yourself at someone else expense.

However, if some little chick slapped a big dude unprovoked and he told her he'd body slam her if she did it again, and she was dumb enough to test him, well...

Skinny kid definitely had something coming. But When a kid is as big as the the big kid is he has to realize he can severely hurt someone. What if the kid landed on his head? He could have died or suffered brain damage. I say a suspension is warranted for both. The big kid needs to continue to stand up for himself but maybe not in the way he did.

No one knows what that fat kid goes through everyday. I hope that skinny kid burns in hell along with his more than likely rich ass family. Everyone can shut up about that fat kid \"should be worried about hurting the skiiny kid\" news flash... DID YOU NOT SEE HIM GETTING PUNCHED IN THE FACE.... WHAT ABOUT THAT IM SURE THERE IS A RISK INVOLVED IN KILLING THE FAT KID... to the fat man- I give you props no one is going to bother you again my friend. Skinny kid- Burn in hell along with you d-bag friends and family

Thanks for confirming what I suspected, that you are either a poor troll or stupid.

Once A runner 8=D wrote:

No one knows what that fat kid goes through everyday. I hope that skinny kid burns in hell along with his more than likely rich ass family. Everyone can shut up about that fat kid "should be worried about hurting the skiiny kid" news flash... DID YOU NOT SEE HIM GETTING PUNCHED IN THE FACE.... WHAT ABOUT THAT IM SURE THERE IS A RISK INVOLVED IN KILLING THE FAT KID... to the fat man- I give you props no one is going to bother you again my friend. Skinny kid- Burn in hell along with you d-bag friends and family

Easy back tubby. Ideally, someone in the big guys corner should counsel him in regards to how this would be playing out if the the little runt was severely injured. Just the way things roll these days.

Not taking the runts side but this would be playing out much differently if the big guy would of crippled or maimed the runt. Everyone loves a helpless victim even if he is a little troll...

Very true

to "zserg"

Ad hominem

I find this discourse rather strange in that it swings from the clueless left to the furious right...

Fact - All creatures in nature have a need to protect themselves as a biological obligation. The universal law or they wind up extinct.

The bully was laying a vicious beating to the kid's skull which could have easily led to brain bleeding if allowed to continue. Was the big kid supposed to calculate the probability that the beating would continue and he would wind up dead? That others would jump in?

No. He was protecting himself instinctively with the tools he could quickly muster. Yes the bully could have died. That is the danger when you play in traffic. Just a fact.

Liberals should learn that in order to protect themselves, people have a universal right to meet force with force when cornered and diplomacy fails.

The Right posters should learn that you shouldn't deliberately try to kill someone for being a jerk. Bad form.

Good for the big Kid. He was an innocent victim protecting his life because it sure looked to me like it would have continued had he done nothing at at the very least would have wound up with a badly scarred face and maybe a hospital visit.

Here's a point that hasn't been raised yet, but is in most articles on the incident:

The Bully was 12

The "victim" is 16 Goddamn years old.

how does that change this incident in your eyes? My brother is 4 years younger than me, and I know that when I was a sophmore in HS and he was a little 6th grader, I could beat the everloving sh!t out of him, even with him getting a 10-punch head start. I still think the little prick got taught a very valuable life lesson, but the victim really went above and beyond. Still, don't punish the victim, but the bully shouldn't get punished either. just chalk it up to life lessons being doled out by the chubby fists of anger.

funny wrote:

Here's a point that hasn't been raised yet, but is in most articles on the incident:

The Bully was 12

The "victim" is 16 Goddamn years old.

how does that change this incident in your eyes? My brother is 4 years younger than me, and I know that when I was a sophmore in HS and he was a little 6th grader, I could beat the everloving sh!t out of him, even with him getting a 10-punch head start. I still think the little prick got taught a very valuable life lesson, but the victim really went above and beyond. Still, don't punish the victim, but the bully shouldn't get punished either. just chalk it up to life lessons being doled out by the chubby fists of anger.

This is the point(how can a tiny bully pick on a big guy) that is misunderstood by most people.

The answer lies in the dynamics of bully found in schools.

A bully is NEVER alone; the person is always part of a clique or a gang.

Do you actually believe someone just haphazardly happened to be there to videotape the whole thing from beginning? These bullies usually set up the whole scene and prepare to tape it with the goal to put it on the internet.

In this case, there were at least three people in the bully gang: the tiny bully, the one videotaping it while shouting encouraging the tiny bully, and the white shirt tough-guy-pretend who thought about going after the bullied.

So was the force excessive exercised by the one being bullied? Absolutely no, had he decided to fight back by exchanging punches with the tiny bully, chances were others would have jumped on him. He did the right thing in ending it with the blow strong enough to terminate the whole scene.

So stop being sympathetic with the bully.

They just always come in a gang.

Stop being a bugger eating loser and being so sensative. Kids get into fights and get picked on. I don't care how great of a parent you think you are, your kids will get into fights and do stupid stuff. If the skinny kids parents are suing the school and the bigger kid then they think their poo don't stink. If you would have gave the skinny a strong talk, he wouldn't have learned a thing or changed. Sometimes you just need to get your ass kicked.

From a grappling standpoint, the big kid did a pretty nice job. He closed the distance on the bully and got control of his head and one arm/shoulder, he had a number of options once he gained that position, but the slam was total class.

Man!! that little black dude got his ass whooped!

Little black dude got hat he deserved no doubt about it.

J.R. wrote:

Obviously this thread is dominated by idiot trolls, from 1984, trying to twist LIES ARE TRUTH, PEACE IS WAR, bullys are little, victims are big, stupid is smart, etc etc.

The only bully in the video was the BIG FAT THUG.

Confused about which one that was?

The victim was the little scrawny kid. Still confused?

Okay here's more information, the BIG FAT THUG BULLY picked up the little scrawny kid victim, held him over his (THE BIG FAT THUG BULLY'S) head and slammed him (the little kid victim) down on the concrete on his (the little kid victim's) head, knees, hips, back, neck and whatever else hit the ground.

Still confused?

Well then perhaps there is no hope for you.

You suck at this. Stop.

The big kid(victim) should have ended that little bastards life. The bully is VERY lucky the victim didn't chose to stomp on his pencil neck.

I wonder if the injuries sustained by the bully effected his cross country practice?

DAYYYUMMM.

He got FUH'D UP.

Letsrun gunner wrote:

I am a teacher and at my school the big kid would not have been punished in any way. If we have clear evidence of who threw the first punch only that child is punished.

I actually think the fact he body slammed him and then walked away says a lot for this kid. In most cases it would have taken 5 people to pull him off from killing the smaller one.

Thats a decent school then. At mine, if you are involved in a fight youre screwed over, automatically suspended. So its either let yourself get beat up completely, or abandon mere defense and in turn beat the other kid up as bad as you can because if you just push him oen time youre already categorized as a participant i nthe fight.