sim wrote:
There are probably some fanatical Lydiardists. Everything has its fanatics. My involvement goes no further than the fact I appreciate what he pointed out, what he discovered. This isn't to say others didn't discover the same thing on their own. Clearly the East Africans didn't get the idea from Lydiard.
The thing is if you are against the idea of long running as the base element of middle to long distance running then nothing anyone says will get you to agree with this appraoch.
Is that what you're actually against?
Test to accept you as a Lydiard non-fanatic and non-fundamentalist.
1 - Let’s consider Lydiard a good coach and Lydiard a good training method, the best in your opinion. But is that perfect ? If Lydiard isn’t perfect, can you name the coaches and what are the training aspect that is done best than the Lydiard one ? Answer with real facts and names, not with excuses.
2 - How many runners or coach names you may reveal that is consider an unsuccessful attempt to train on the Lydiard method ? Please name it. Real examples of major failure of the Lydiard training to fit properly on the runner need.
If you have nothing to say that’s because you are an ignorant or a Lydiard fanatic fundamentalist.
Test to accept you as a Lydiard non-fanatic and non-fundamentalist.
1 - Let’s consider Lydiard a good coach and Lydiard a good training method, the best in your opinion. But is that perfect ? If Lydiard isn’t perfect, can you name the coaches and what are the training aspect that is done best than the Lydiard one ? Answer with real facts and names, not with excuses.
2 - How many runners or coach names you may reveal that is consider an unsuccessful attempt to train on the Lydiard method ? Please name it. Real examples of major failure of the Lydiard training to fit properly on the runner need.
If you have nothing to say that’s because you are an ignorant or a Lydiard fanatic fundamentalist.
Let’s see if you or HRE or every other Lydiard fanatic is able to pass on this test. Please no excuses or justification for the failure. Just answer in the case that’s a Lydiard unsuccessful or failure or inadequate.
Please post your answers.
0 answers: Lydiard fanatic.
1 answer: very Lydiard engaged.
2 answers: moderate Lydiard.
multiple examples: understands Lydiard but doesn´t follow Lydiard blindly.
Note. If you name your own example of failure while you follow the Lydiard method that the reason of your unsuccess that’s not your fault but the imperfection of the Lydiard method you get one extra point.