What is especially bad is your reasoning powers. Drivel.
It’s not drivel. It’s widely accepted that there’s a continuum of violence severity. If you don’t know that, then you should stop offering your ignorant opinions.
You simply equated doping discussion with physical violence against women - which is drivel. You then try to weasel out of that by arguing not all forms of violence are equally bad - which isn't in dispute. The reason for that is the subject of the thread is arguing whether it is ok to hit a woman (no, it isn't), which has nothing to do with threads or comments about doping, except in your fevered mind.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
You simply equated doping discussion with physical violence against women - which is drivel. You then try to weasel out of that by arguing not all forms of violence are equally bad - which isn't in dispute. The reason for that is the subject of the thread is arguing whether it is ok to hit a woman (no, it isn't), which has nothing to do with threads or comments about doping, except in your fevered mind.
It is heartrending that there always seems to be one more thread on these boards about hitting women.
It’s not drivel. It’s widely accepted that there’s a continuum of violence severity. If you don’t know that, then you should stop offering your ignorant opinions.
You simply equated doping discussion with physical violence against women - which is drivel. You then try to weasel out of that by arguing not all forms of violence are equally bad - which isn't in dispute. The reason for that is the subject of the thread is arguing whether it is ok to hit a woman (no, it isn't), which has nothing to do with threads or comments about doping, except in your fevered mind.
Wrong. Two things can be in the same category but that doesn’t mean they are exactly the same thing. A dog and a cat are both mammals, but they aren’t the same. Likewise, physical violence and verbal violence are both forms of violence but not the same. I recognize that nuance is challenging for you. If what I’m saying is too complicated for you, perhaps you can take a class on understanding violence and why all forms of violence are bad.
You simply equated doping discussion with physical violence against women - which is drivel. You then try to weasel out of that by arguing not all forms of violence are equally bad - which isn't in dispute. The reason for that is the subject of the thread is arguing whether it is ok to hit a woman (no, it isn't), which has nothing to do with threads or comments about doping, except in your fevered mind.
Wrong. Two things can be in the same category but that doesn’t mean they are exactly the same thing. A dog and a cat are both mammals, but they aren’t the same. Likewise, physical violence and verbal violence are both forms of violence but not the same. I recognize that nuance is challenging for you. If what I’m saying is too complicated for you, perhaps you can take a class on understanding violence and why all forms of violence are bad.
You introduced verbal violence in the context of discussion about doping (which has long been permitted in this site),which you likened to the subject of this thread, which is hitting women. They have nothing to do with each other. You are a posturing idiot.
I called you out on your verbal violence against another poster, who had noted your hypocrisy of condemning physical violence against women while you damage a young woman’s reputation with drug accusations. That poster was right.
Your continued insults further expose your hypocrisy, cantankerousness, and ineptitude.
I called you out on your verbal violence against another poster, who had noted your hypocrisy of condemning physical violence against women while you damage a young woman’s reputation with drug accusations. That poster was right.
Your continued insults further expose your hypocrisy, cantankerousness, and ineptitude.
Discussion of training is not verbal violence. It has escaped you that this site enables discussion of issues like doping, as well as a wide range of social and political issues. No one is required to agree with anyone else. But "verbal violence" is merely opinions you don't like. If you choose to condemn another poster for what they say you can hardly complain if you earn a response in kind. Your pretentious moralising gets what it deserves. But the fact is you don't have to be here if you don't like it.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
I called you out on your verbal violence against another poster, who had noted your hypocrisy of condemning physical violence against women while you damage a young woman’s reputation with drug accusations. That poster was right.
Your continued insults further expose your hypocrisy, cantankerousness, and ineptitude.
Discussion of training is not verbal violence. It has escaped you that this site enables discussion of issues like doping, as well as a wide range of social and political issues. No one is required to agree with anyone else. But "verbal violence" is merely opinions you don't like. If you choose to condemn another poster for what they say you can hardly complain if you earn a response in kind. Your pretentious moralising gets what it deserves. But the fact is you don't have to be here if you don't like it.
You are projecting. Verbal violence is you insulting people by calling them a moron, idiot, etc. just because they wrote something you disagree with. You do it in almost every thread you enter. It’s possible to disagree with people without insulting them but you repeatedly opt for verbal violence.
You don’t have to be here if reading opinions that differ from yours causes you to get so upset that you lash out at the people expressing them. Take a moment to reflect on the pervasive negative impact your acrimonious posting has on this board. Consider why you are the common denominator in so many conflicts here.
Discussion of training is not verbal violence. It has escaped you that this site enables discussion of issues like doping, as well as a wide range of social and political issues. No one is required to agree with anyone else. But "verbal violence" is merely opinions you don't like. If you choose to condemn another poster for what they say you can hardly complain if you earn a response in kind. Your pretentious moralising gets what it deserves. But the fact is you don't have to be here if you don't like it.
You are projecting. Verbal violence is you insulting people by calling them a moron, idiot, etc. just because they wrote something you disagree with. You do it in almost every thread you enter. It’s possible to disagree with people without insulting them but you repeatedly opt for verbal violence.
You don’t have to be here if reading opinions that differ from yours causes you to get so upset that you lash out at the people expressing them. Take a moment to reflect on the pervasive negative impact your acrimonious posting has on this board. Consider why you are the common denominator in so many conflicts here.
The common denominator is the whining crybabies like you. Oh, no - that's "verbal violence!"
But a woman punched in the face certainly knows about violence.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.