Dude, did you even read my post? I said one crummy day right after getting it. That's what happens. Stop sensationalizing it. Do people get dental work even though it's sucks? Can you find a NY times article for me on that?
Jesus man.
Yes, I read your post. Here's what you said in full:
Honestly for a woman to refuse is annoying. I've been in long term relationships with sexual women who had them for years and not once did I hear "oh goodness my IUD is really bothering me today" they don't even feel it once it's in.
I get that it's"her choice" but it's still annoying that she's against it for some reason. Makes no sense, reminds me of the anti vaxx crowd - clear long term benefits and one crummy day immediately after getting it.
In response, I said you don't know what you're talking about.
But unlike you, I didn't base my claim solely on what I've surmised based on second-hand observations of a small number of women I've known personally through LTSRs.
Nor did I base my claim solely on my own personal experience with IUD insertion and the excruciating pain and alarming amount of bleeding and clotting it caused me.
Instead, I posted excerpts from a timely NY Times article - published just yesterday! - which shows that quite a few women apart from me and some women I know personally have and do experience excruciating pain during and after IUD insertion.
Now by likening getting an IUD inserted and having dental work done, you're just making it even more obvious that you don't know what you're talking about.
Pain relief is part and parcel of modern dentistry. Dentists use an array of medications to make sure their patients can't feel any pain during dental procedures.
Even when getting routine procedures like cavities filled, dental patients are given local anesthetic to totally numb the area before the dentist proceeds. If the numbing medication starts to wear off during a procedured, all a patient has to do is raise a hand and the dentist will adminster more medication so that the area being worked on returns to being totally numbed.
Modern gynecology is very different to modern dentistry in this regard. HCPs in gynecology do not customarily offer, recommend or give girls and women any meaningful pain relief when doing a host of invasive procedures that a not insignficant number of us find painful - such as IUD insertion, cervical smear tests (Pap smears), use of a vaginal speculum during pelvic exams, and palpation of the ovaries and uterus.
AFAICT, the main reason there's such a vast difference between the way patients' pain is treated in dentistry and gynecology is that men and boys get dental work done just as much as women and girls do - but gynecological procedures like IUD insertion and smear tests are done only on women and girls.
Instead of being offered the kind of pain relief analogous to the pain relief routinely given in dental procedures, women and girls who undergo gynecological procedures that many of us find painful are routinely told tough shxt, suck it up. We're told these procedures can't really hurt as much as some of us say - and even they do hurt, and hurt a whole lot, who cares, it's not really a big deal since the pain won't kill us and it will go away in time.
Were also told that since pain is supposedly women's lot in life anyways, we have no right to refuse procedures many of us find painful - especially when the men in our lives are demanding that we get such procedures for their convenience and pleasure as in OP's case.
Indeed, men like you have the brass neck and bollocks to whinge that "honestly for a woman to refuse is annoying." Then for the kicker you claim that women who show the human tendency to try to avoid pain in this scenario "makes no sense."
Worse, women and girls are regularly told that the pain many of us feel during these sorts of gynecological procedures - and afterwards - isn't real, that it's all in our heads.
On top of that, we're scolded and derided by men like you who issue orders from on high telling women like me to "stop it" and shut up about pain that only female people can possibly go through. Because you think discussing a health matter in a newspaper like the NYT or in online forums is the same as "sensationalizing it."
Why not just locate a female Doctor? Problem solved.
I can see why you have multiple failed relationships behind you.
You might not have heard about the woman complaining because she had it put in for her previous partner. The first six months are painful from a lot of women. Of course it varies.
Condoms are not painful, just oh the sex is like 5 percent less sensitive or whatever. Life is sooooo hard. (Pun unintended)
Since a lot of you here think your woman is cheating on you, a condom might be best re. guarding against STDs.
This thread is hilarious but I'm gonna make a serious post anyway.
Condoms vs. IUD: I'd take the momentary pain of an IUD (the insertion hurts but most of the newer ones have few side effects beyond insertion) over the weird sensation of a condom. And if a woman is not super lubricated condoms can be painful. i mean everyone hates sex with condoms right?
unpopular opinion: women don't like condoms either.
Sex is enjoyable, but it is an act that results in children. You shouldn't be having sex with someone unless you want children with that person.
The only sexual act that result in (possible) pregnancy is vaginal intercourse. You have other options for both of you to attain desired results. USE THEM.
My gf was taking bc pills and wanted to stop because of the hormonal disturbances
She got the copper IUD and says she wished she had done so years previously
I'd recommend against the copper IUD. I got one because I was running seriously and didnt want hormones. The MF caused serious cramping and periods so heavy that I contemplated going to the ER my first period because I was having to change tampons hourly. I had it taken out after 5 years and it was so great to get rid of it.
A couple years after that I got a skyla (tiny low-dose hormonal iud) and it was great. Zero side effects (beyond pain on insertion). Period came normally. Had it removed after 3 years.
Sex is enjoyable, but it is an act that results in children. You shouldn't be having sex with someone unless you want children with that person.
I actually agree with this. I was married for 32 years and dated before and after my divorce but I didn't have sex with any woman unless I was willing to be with them long term. I DO love kids- I had two (now adults) and miss having them around.
Honestly- if I had two women that I wanted to spend forever with and all things being equal the only difference was that one of them had children, I'd take the opportunity to expand my family.
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with this take. I'd add a degree of nuance and say the woman can be someone you realistically think you could deal with unintentionally having conceived children with as well. Sex is such an intimate, vulnerable, and risky thing to casually be doing with someone. Honestly, the OP is better off just whacking it or using condoms.
My gf was taking bc pills and wanted to stop because of the hormonal disturbances
She got the copper IUD and says she wished she had done so years previously
I'd recommend against the copper IUD. I got one because I was running seriously and didnt want hormones. The MF caused serious cramping and periods so heavy that I contemplated going to the ER my first period because I was having to change tampons hourly. I had it taken out after 5 years and it was so great to get rid of it.
A couple years after that I got a skyla (tiny low-dose hormonal iud) and it was great. Zero side effects (beyond pain on insertion). Period came normally. Had it removed after 3 years.
Now I'm an old lady so I just raw dog it.
hey i appreciate the feedback from an actual women. experience i mentioned was about 10 years ago now and she didn't have any complication, but maybe she was one of the lucky ones idk
A vasectomy is a good option when the man will never want any (more) children. It is NOT a good option as temporary birth control. It may be unreversible, as someone here testified.
Condoms are always an option.
As far as IUD's are concerned, Mrs Charlesvdw says it not pleasant to have them put in place, but they give her no side effects at all in the long term. With the Mirena device monthly bleedings are less pronounced which is a big plus.
I'm a woman and I've never wanted to get one, either.
I agree that "on paper" it seems like the best option, but I just imagine that my uterus would hate it and try to expel it. I just can't stand that crampy feeling. Also, my best friend is a 1970s IUD baby (meaning her mom got pregnant with her while she had an IUD in, but kept the pregnancy), so that may have influenced it. And I have known women who have had the IUD get embedded in the wall of their uterus and who have had to have surgery to have it removed.
So I take a low dose pill... I've been on it for years. Get some breakthrough bleeding, migraines, and other effects that may or may not be related. I dunno... it's the best that option that I've figured out. Either one of us could've been snipped, I suppose. I'm planning to stop the pill it when I turn 50, which is really not too far away now.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.