Electrical Engineer wrote:
…. Personally I think books take up too much time on one subject, especially fiction books that you don't learn anything. I might as well watch a two hour movie if I simply want to see a story play out. Reading to-the-point articles on things is more enjoyable to me than dilly-dallying through a novel.
You have a great reply to OP’s question, and so you do what you like and what works for you. If you “don’t learn anything [from]” fiction, then I suppose reading it would be a waste of your time. However, a number of very bright, very learned people contend that they’ve learned a great deal from fiction.
As for “dilly-dallying through a novel,” there are many novelists who would strongly agree with you about the relative uselessness of that. That’s why they endeavor to write novels geared toward preventing “dilly-dallying.” You may reject their goals as unattainable, and similarly reject the very premise of “serious literature.” You can craft a solid argument suggesting that one would not profit intellectually from difficult reading of fiction on complex questions. Yet many disagree with you.
