Jamb innnnnnn wrote:
Could be conflating the two.
However, we'd be effectively subsidizing the CHAZ/CHOP shtbum lifestyle. Not ok with that.
I'm sure thats what the left wants, their constituents fat, happy, comfortably dumb, living for "free".
Question for you. Would you be ok with UBI subsidizing a different lifestyle -- say a church going, volunteering, non-drug using, traditional family minded, etc. one?