Wejo needs to apologize to the Clean Sport Collective

thin-skinned hypocrites run this place.

Shelby tested positive and she did not have a viable explanation. So WADA banned her and CAS supported the ban. It's unfortunate but the case is over.

Shelby has every right to raise money for continued defense. But Clean Sport also has the right to say, hey don't fund her.

Wejo,

I have so many questions for you, Gault and Rojo regarding this case.

1. What makes you so convinced it was unintentional? Because whenever anyone is caught doping there is ALWAYS a possibility it's unintentional. Why have you not brought this possibility up in other cases? Why is it so important to you to lean on this possibility?

2. If it was in fact unintentional, do you believe that Shelby already knows or highly suspects where it ACTUALLY came from? Because that's what I think. Regardless of intent or not, Shelby is probably aware of the true source and probably has known about it since December. If this is the case, don't you think it's disrespectful that she's lying to everyone? Honestly, do you actually think she still doesn't know the true source today?

3. Do you believe nandrolone helps middle distance runners and it could potentially help Shelby?

4. What are your thoughts about Shelby's progression over the years? Her 1500/5K progression has been posted on message boards for a while. Her progression has been highly suspect to me. If it's not suspect to you, do you care to explain why it isn't? Do you see other runners matching her trajectory?

5. What do you think of the following performances:

--Shelby's 14:23 AR in 2020 against no one but Karissa on a high school track with no crowd. She closed in a 60. (PR by 11 seconds)

--Shelby's 14:34 AR in 2018 when her PR prior was 15:00. She said in a Citius podcast that the original plan was to run sub-15 but she was getting in such "great shape" that they had to change their goals to AR.

--Shelby winning USA Cross (10K on grass) coming back a week later to win the 2 mile and place 2nd in the mile at 2019 indoors. She was the only runner to do both, and she won two of the three events she entered into.

--2018 blowing by 2017 World Silver Medalist Jenny Simpson to win her first USA title in the 1500 and never looking back.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/shelby-houlihan-on-developing-her-lethal-kick-record/id1204506559?i=1000415687065

These Pretzels wrote:

I just posted this without seeing the CSC's response and it's almost exactly what I said. Wejo, you (likely willfully) missed a very clear interpretation of their retweet. You were obviously looking for a fight here.

It's rather opposite, a bunch of people here just want to fight with Wejo, even though they clearly understand what his message is.

wejo wrote:

I’m going to write an article on this defending Shelby’s right to defend herself . I just relistened to my comments and stand by them.My comments specifically started criticizing the CSC for encouraging people not to donate. If you believe in the right for an athlete to defend themselves then you believe in the right for an athlete to raise money for that defense.It’s a pretty universal concept. You can listen here: clip starts at relevant point and is a little over a minute 

https://overcast.fm/+V2u-gP3KQ...

This is everything wrong with LRC. Why do men need to double down on stuff when they are clearly wrong?

Wejo -- you jumped to a conclusion that wasn't there. Stop making everything into a free speech type issue. CSC does a ton of good for the sport & is simply encouraging folks not to donate to support someone convicted of doping. They didn't say she can't defend herself. That's her right. It's their right to tell folks not to spend their $$$ on that. We don't need an article from you getting in your feels about this.

LOL listening to the podcast now.

It's okay.

You can say convicted drug cheat, Shelby Houlihan....because she is one.

also Wejo,

find me on the thread where someone said "how DARE they give money". Find me anywhere where anyone said this.

There was a lot of recommendations NOT to give money. That is totally fair. There is a lot of concern about where the money is actually going. That is also fair.

Curious for when this Gault interview with Shelby is coming out.

"She deserves her day in court"

WEJO SHE HAD HER DAY IN COURT!!! JUNE 11TH WAS HER DAY IN COURT WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND!

the uber eats idea is a good one though.

The people who don't believe Shelby are NOT necessarily believers of the system, Jon.

We are just believers that Shelby's story is absolutely ridiculous and she is lying to us all.

My god people are stupid

(1) you allow COVID misinformation and all sorts of other yeah on your website under the guise of free speech

(2) you insult the CSC for exercising their free speech NOT TO MENTION DOING THEIR JOB

(3) after, by the way, Shelby had her day in court and was found GUILTY!

This site disgusts me

Wejo has no response for this

Shelby is guilty wrote:

Shelby is guilty wrote:

My god people are stupid

(1) you allow COVID misinformation and all sorts of other yeah on your website under the guise of free speech

(2) you insult the CSC for exercising their free speech NOT TO MENTION DOING THEIR JOB

(3) after, by the way, Shelby had her day in court and was found GUILTY!

This site disgusts me

Wejo has no response for this

You're just trolling for attention.

so who are you? wrote:

Shelby is guilty wrote:

Wejo has no response for this

You're just trolling for attention.

100% projection on your part, Chief

I don't care for journalist drama, but I do know everyone has the right to ask for money and give money to any cause they want. Personally, there's so many better causes you should donate your money. Her gofundme is simply going to go into her already wealthy lawyer's pocket. So, you can buy another house for her lawyer, or donate to toddlers dying of hunger. It's your choice to decide what is most important to you.

Oh yea, not to mention she's guilty and has no logical defense.

Shelby is guilty wrote:

100% projection on your part, Chief

LOL. These were all their posts in this thread, cited in full:

so who are you? wrote:

So your propaganda is the truth?

so who are you? wrote:

But you're a determined, obsessive troll, so your opinions should not be taken seriously.

so who are you? wrote:

Yes there is a logical explanation. You just don't want to hear it.

so who are you? wrote:

You're just trolling for attention.

Shelby is guilty wrote:

so who are you? wrote:

You're just trolling for attention.

100% projection on your part, Chief

No it's not. I know your game. You're an obvious troll.

This is why its more expensive to execute a murderer rather than jail them.

Hasn't she already exhausted her appeals?

Wejo getting absolutely wrecked in this thread, lol.

But I guess the hits on the forum keep coming $$$

Ps Shelby's already appealed and lost.

so who are you? wrote:

Shelby is guilty wrote:

100% projection on your part, Chief

No it's not. I know your game. You're an obvious troll.

My game of telling the truth? Sit down, Clown