liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
She is certainly taking megadoses of something - however you describe it.
Why?
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
She is certainly taking megadoses of something - however you describe it.
Why?
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Foul mouthed response: yet again.
But he was agreeing with what I said - he said it was "spot on". I guess he's hurt your feelings.
Yeah, you're stupid. We all know that.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Why?
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
Why did you say she was taking mega doses of something. But you knew that was the question.
Armstronglivs wrote:
letsdrum wrote:
It seems completely impossible for you to go into the points. Just throwing in your usual drivel. Childish behaviour.
You don't have any "points". You don't know what they are. You are only here to yap at my heels, like the ridiculous creature that you are.
It's clear that you have written a lot of nonsense regarding languages for instance.
Don't you know some more belittling designations than "ridiculous"? I'm sure you know.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Why?
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
Where do you got this info, this obviously is the question.
So, can you please answer this.
Or can you clarify that you just strongly believe she is taking "megadoses of something". This would be a fair comment to the subject - also with absolutely no relevance for the question if she really is taking "megadoses of something" or not.
liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
Why did you say she was taking mega doses of something. But you knew that was the question.
Any chance of a answer ?
liar soorer wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Why did you say she was taking mega doses of something. But you knew that was the question.
Any chance of a answer ?
I don't attempt to converse with a barking dog.
letsdrum wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Why is she taking it? I guess it's so she can run a wr.
Where do you got this info, this obviously is the question.
So, can you please answer this.
Or can you clarify that you just strongly believe she is taking "megadoses of something". This would be a fair comment to the subject - also with absolutely no relevance for the question if she really is taking "megadoses of something" or not.
I have said earlier in the thread why I think she is doping. But I am not going to rehearse that again for a tedious late-arrival such as yourself. I learn nothing from any dialogue with you and do not expect to persuade you of anything.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Any chance of a answer ?
I don't attempt to converse with a barking dog.
Especially one who has got you cornered.
As soon as you are asked to explain or justify you run into a corner and hide.
letsdrum wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You don't have any "points". You don't know what they are. You are only here to yap at my heels, like the ridiculous creature that you are.
It's clear that you have written a lot of nonsense regarding languages for instance.
Don't you know some more belittling designations than "ridiculous"? I'm sure you know.
I am sure you could earn more descriptions than merely being ridiculous. But you aren't interesting enough for me to list them. You will have to do your own research.
liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I don't attempt to converse with a barking dog.
Especially one who has got you cornered.
As soon as you are asked to explain or justify you run into a corner and hide.
The barking never stops.
Armstronglivs wrote:
letsdrum wrote:
Where do you got this info, this obviously is the question.
So, can you please answer this.
Or can you clarify that you just strongly believe she is taking "megadoses of something". This would be a fair comment to the subject - also with absolutely no relevance for the question if she really is taking "megadoses of something" or not.
I have said earlier in the thread why I think she is doping. But I am not going to rehearse that again for a tedious late-arrival such as yourself. I learn nothing from any dialogue with you and do not expect to persuade you of anything.
Another refusal to explain or justify.
You say “ rehearse again” ; but no you twist words to lie.
You have not explained anything let alone rehearse.
Armstronglivs wrote:
liar soorer wrote:
Especially one who has got you cornered.
As soon as you are asked to explain or justify you run into a corner and hide.
The barking never stops.
Another evasion from the hiding lying foul mouth.
Armstronglivs wrote:
letsdrum wrote:
It's clear that you have written a lot of nonsense regarding languages for instance.
Don't you know some more belittling designations than "ridiculous"? I'm sure you know.
I am sure you could earn more descriptions than merely being ridiculous. But you aren't interesting enough for me to list them. You will have to do your own research.
So, you are not going to say more to the points in question than "there are no points". Extremely childish.
It's the same in so many threads with you, exactly the same.
And what a poor argument to say "you are late to the thread so I will not explain my points at all". You are definitely one of the most arrogant posters on this site, anybody knows this.
Armstronglivs wrote:
letsdrum wrote:
Where do you got this info, this obviously is the question.
So, can you please answer this.
Or can you clarify that you just strongly believe she is taking "megadoses of something". This would be a fair comment to the subject - also with absolutely no relevance for the question if she really is taking "megadoses of something" or not.
I have said earlier in the thread why I think she is doping.
OK, here are your detailed explanations:
- Shoes? Sure. PED'S. For sure
- But there's nothing surprising about women now running at the speed of males in a doped sport.
- But it is kind of puzzling that the best dopers in the past were nowhere near as fast ....
- I also remember Gidey getting destroyed by Hassan and another no-name runner in the 10k in the Tokyo Olympics. She has certainly found the answer since. Wonders never cease with today's record-breakers. I'll bet modern science over natural ability any day.
- 2.15 is nowhere comparable to a 1.02 half for a woman. Looking at the men's times the relativity is closer to 2.10.
- So she's running as fast as a man. But that isn't a red flag here.
- It isn't the shoes but something much more potent.
- The one thing you guys cannot get your heads around is that there can only be one reason why a woman is now competitive with male runners. Absolutely doped. Because they too are doping.
So, you have given exactly one reason why you THINK (why don't you always say you THINK?) she is doping: she is running very fast.
And Hassan is a no-name runner to you? Well. this explains something.
And Armstronglivs has several times quoted that she is running as fast as "a man".
But the HM WR for men is 5:21 minutes faster than her record, so what is he talking? She is running as fast as some men? Well, this would be true if she ran 2 hours for the HM.
This new record definitely is extreme - and now?
letsdrum wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I am sure you could earn more descriptions than merely being ridiculous. But you aren't interesting enough for me to list them. You will have to do your own research.
So, you are not going to say more to the points in question than "there are no points". Extremely childish.
It's the same in so many threads with you, exactly the same.
And what a poor argument to say "you are late to the thread so I will not explain my points at all". You are definitely one of the most arrogant posters on this site, anybody knows this.
You are right. A nasty low educated non reading foul mouth.
letsdrum wrote:
And Armstronglivs has several times quoted that she is running as fast as "a man".
But the HM WR for men is 5:21 minutes faster than her record, so what is he talking? She is running as fast as some men? Well, this would be true if she ran 2 hours for the HM.
This new record definitely is extreme - and now?
Armstronglivs has never let facts get in his way.
letsdrum wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I am sure you could earn more descriptions than merely being ridiculous. But you aren't interesting enough for me to list them. You will have to do your own research.
So, you are not going to say more to the points in question than "there are no points". Extremely childish.
It's the same in so many threads with you, exactly the same.
And what a poor argument to say "you are late to the thread so I will not explain my points at all". You are definitely one of the most arrogant posters on this site, anybody knows this.
You have said nothing on the subject of Gidey or of doping generally that interests me. Nor am I interested in persuading you to my point of view. And I am not obligated to try.
liar soorer wrote:
letsdrum wrote:
So, you are not going to say more to the points in question than "there are no points". Extremely childish.
It's the same in so many threads with you, exactly the same.
And what a poor argument to say "you are late to the thread so I will not explain my points at all". You are definitely one of the most arrogant posters on this site, anybody knows this.
You are right. A nasty low educated non reading foul mouth.
Your tantrums never end.