Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Ok, Cain is out, Moore is likely out. What other unqualified people can Spanks nominate for the Fed? Must have been on TV a lot, must be unqualified. Quality of hair is important.

Mike Lindell. (My Pillow guy.)

Obama was not that intelligent. WTF is wrong with you? Obama, as editor/publisher of the Harvard Review, published NOTHING. Has there every been a editor/publisher of the Harvard Review who published NOTHING, EL ZIPPO, NADA?!!

So how did Barack Obama fare in college?

It’s unclear how well he did as an undergraduate, although he was not a distinguished student. Obama refuses to release his transcript from his undergraduate years. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, Obama was not well-known among classmates after he transferred to Columbia University from Occidental College in the early 1980s. The article quotes a former roommate who states that Obama’s performance improved after he stopped taking drugs (which Obama has admitted to openly). Since Obama did not graduate with honors, that means his GPA was between a 2.0 and a 3.3 — although, since he was admitted to Harvard Law School, it’s hard to imagine his GPA was much lower than a 3.3.

Obama graduated from Columbia in 1983 with a degree in political science. He specialized in international relations.

Sally would also improve if she stopped taking drugs.

They’re making you do stupid stuff, like supporting trump!

It took me four weeks but I just finished reading the Barr report. It was not easy reading. But, the gist if the report, if I may proclaim, is that the Trump campaign, Trump and the Trump clan committed no conspiracy, no collusion and no obstruction. Case closed.

Sally Vix wrote:

It took me four weeks but I just finished reading the Barr report. It was not easy reading. But, the gist if the report, if I may proclaim, is that the Trump campaign, Trump and the Trump clan committed no conspiracy, no collusion and no obstruction. Case closed.

It took you four weeks to read 4 pages? Might want to avoid commenting on the intellect of others.

The Fokus wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

It took me four weeks but I just finished reading the Barr report. It was not easy reading. But, the gist if the report, if I may proclaim, is that the Trump campaign, Trump and the Trump clan committed no conspiracy, no collusion and no obstruction. Case closed.

It took you four weeks to read 4 pages? Might want to avoid commenting on the intellect of others.

I was totally kidding about needing 4 weeks to read a 4-page report. Did you really not understand that it was in jest?

Sally Vix wrote:

The Fokus wrote:

It took you four weeks to read 4 pages? Might want to avoid commenting on the intellect of others.

I was totally kidding about needing 4 weeks to read a 4-page report. Did you really not understand that it was in jest?

It only took me three weeks and 5 days.

It burns...IT BURNS

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1123381852948041730

agip wrote:

It burns...IT BURNS

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1123381852948041730

And instead of the focus being on the economy which has hummed along for a decade, or much needed infrastructure spending, poor Trump seemingly can’t get away from bad news.

All he had to do was not fire Comey.....

Really if he was just a little more transparent, like release your stupid tax returns and whatever is there is a story for a day and disappears, and would just stop stonewalling Congress, he would be much better off.

Alan

Has anyone ever heard Mueller actually talk over these last two years?

agip wrote:

It burns...IT BURNS

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1123381852948041730

The only thing burning is your TDS infected head.

You conspiracy nutjobs are insane. Mueller did not dispute the accuracy of Barr's letter. Since you libs clearly don't read past the headlines. Mueller didn't dispute the accuracy of Barr's March 24 letter.

"When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."

No collusion

Thanks for playing

KAG2020

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The only thing burning is your TDS infected head.

TDS: a disease afflicting mouth-breathers who slobber all over the Orange Turd know as Trump.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

It burns...IT BURNS

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1123381852948041730

The only thing burning is your TDS infected head.

You conspiracy nutjobs are insane. Mueller did not dispute the accuracy of Barr's letter. Since you libs clearly don't read past the headlines. Mueller didn't dispute the accuracy of Barr's March 24 letter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-complained-that-barrs-letter-did-not-capture-context-of-trump-probe/2019/04/30/d3c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

"When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."

No collusion

Thanks for playing

KAG2020

It's not a question of black/white lies/truth...it's a question of whether Barr fairly summarized the Mueller Report. Clearly Mueller feels Barr did not do that.

Barr’s too stupid to get through the report, but we’re not. Another brain ? donor hired by trump, when he bothers to fill the position at all!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

It burns...IT BURNS

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1123381852948041730

The only thing burning is your TDS infected head.

You conspiracy nutjobs are insane. Mueller did not dispute the accuracy of Barr's letter. Since you libs clearly don't read past the headlines. Mueller didn't dispute the accuracy of Barr's March 24 letter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-complained-that-barrs-letter-did-not-capture-context-of-trump-probe/2019/04/30/d3c8fdb6-6b7b-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html

"When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."

No collusion

Thanks for playing

KAG2020

You are a stupid person.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations“

Me thinks Mueller will be talking to Congress soon so there’s no “public confusion”.

Alan

Sounds to me that Mueller felt Barr wasn't accurate talking about why Mueller didn't recommend indicting Spanks on obstruction. I believe the report says Mueller felt that wasn't an option, per DOJ rules, but would have indicted of that werent' a DOJ rule.

Barr didn't say any of that - he merely said Mueller did not indict on obstruction.

That's my guess, anyway.

That Barr lied by omission of key facts.

agip wrote:

Sounds to me that Mueller felt Barr wasn't accurate talking about why Mueller didn't recommend indicting Spanks on obstruction. I believe the report says Mueller felt that wasn't an option, per DOJ rules, but would have indicted of that werent' a DOJ rule.

Barr didn't say any of that - he merely said Mueller did not indict on obstruction.

That's my guess, anyway.

That Barr lied by omission of key facts.

Mueller is a bit passive aggressive on obstruction. If we had concluded Trump didn’t obstruct we would have said so. He should have been more precise and to the point. If he meant to say “We feel Trump obstructed but we can’t indict due to DOJ Policy” then he should have said just that. Maybe it’s the way they had to write it? I don’t know cop talk or lawyer talk.

Alan