No one seems immature on this message board... compared to baby trump.
No one seems immature on this message board... compared to baby trump.
Fat hurts wrote:
Gander wrote:
And Fat Hurts wants to break up families by letting those family members stay who haven’t broken any laws and deport those who have.
Yes. Fat Hurts is a hypocrite.
I never said anything like that.
But even if I did it would not be hypocritical. Learn English.
So you’re okay with allowing all those who come here illegally to stay.
Hypocrite.
Trump’s wife came here illegally!
Orca wrote:
So, I should have held my nose and voted for Hillary as being the better person, which compared to Trump she is. Trump set the bar low, and have lowered it below ground level.
Yes, you should have.
Hmmmmm.
Flagpole’s boy seems to fall prey to hoaxers.
LOL
Gortat wrote:
Nice try. No way you’re over 18.
While you prove you are well under 18.
jesseriley wrote:
Trump’s wife came here illegally!
As did her sister. And her parents are chain migrators.
Sally Vix wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Because current law states that anyone from anywhere can present themselves at the border and ask for asylum. That is the current US and International law.
I’m ok with that law changing, provided we have the infrastructure available in Mexico and points elsewhere to handle the influx of asylum seekers. Change the law so that asylum seekers can do so at embassies/consulates. But again you will need the infrastructure in place as far as judges, temporarily housing, etc.
Again.....building a wall doesn’t change this so I’m not sure ANYONE on either side has actually put forth a plan that makes sense. Shutting down the courts and building a wall 1) won’t fix the problem and 2) would be illegal (removing immigration judges, not allowing asylum cases to be heard, turning people back). Removing ICE or tearing down walls also does absolutely jack.
Alan
Alan, I appreciate the thought you put into your posts. You seem to be respectful of others' opinions. We may not always agree but you present some thoughtful posts.
I'm less respectful o fyou Sally because I assume you know this sort of stuff. But then when it turns out you know next to nothing about what you are preaching about, it makes you sort of open for insult and mockery.
I mean you seem to genuinely think democrats are morons of the first order. Because you don't know anything, and judging them on your basis of knowing nothing, yeah, I'd understand that. But if you spent any time actually learning about things before you have strong opinions about them...you might be more tolerable.
Gander wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I never said anything like that.
But even if I did it would not be hypocritical. Learn English.
So you’re okay with allowing all those who come here illegally to stay.
Hypocrite.
I'll just say this one more time.
1) I never said that.
2) You don't know the meaning of the word "hypocrite"
3) Learn English.
Fat hurts wrote:
Gander wrote:
So you’re okay with allowing all those who come here illegally to stay.
Hypocrite.
I'll just say this one more time.
1) I never said that.
2) You don't know the meaning of the word "hypocrite"
3) Learn English.
So you’re okay with deporting all who come here illegally?
Hypocrite.
Speaking of hypocrites, you gotta love ? that genocidal war in Yemen that trump was heavily bribed to support. That “internationalist” stuff that he was supposed to be against.
Gander wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I'll just say this one more time.
1) I never said that.
2) You don't know the meaning of the word "hypocrite"
3) Learn English.
So you’re okay with deporting all who come here illegally?
Hypocrite.
I'm OK with deporting you since you refuse to learn the English language.
agip wrote:
I'm less respectful o fyou Sally because I assume you know this sort of stuff. But then when it turns out you know next to nothing about what you are preaching about, it makes you sort of open for insult and mockery.
I mean you seem to genuinely think democrats are morons of the first order. Because you don't know anything, and judging them on your basis of knowing nothing, yeah, I'd understand that. But if you spent any time actually learning about things before you have strong opinions about them...you might be more tolerable.
Dude, it's just an internet troll. A troll who claims to be the old "Sally Vixxxen" who was outed as a giant troll years ago and basically a card carrying member of the KKK if memory serves correctly. Why do you think the account was banned? Have you seen the racist sh!t that gets posted and allowed to stay up on these boards? That's how much of a troll and how over the top the old account was : too racist even for Letsrun.
I don't know why I seem to be the only person to remember this. Maybe this is some weird Truman show sh!t being played on me idk
I'm not sure on all of the dynamics of the Yemen war but Trump vetoing a bipartisan bill is always curious.
Some Republicans are again sending a message that they are not all on board with everything Trump.
Trump's alignment with Saudi Arabia where he has business dealings and who assassinated a journalist for speaking out against them is not a good look for Trump.
Potential emoluments clause issues.
Racket wrote:
agip wrote:
I'm less respectful o fyou Sally because I assume you know this sort of stuff. But then when it turns out you know next to nothing about what you are preaching about, it makes you sort of open for insult and mockery.
I mean you seem to genuinely think democrats are morons of the first order. Because you don't know anything, and judging them on your basis of knowing nothing, yeah, I'd understand that. But if you spent any time actually learning about things before you have strong opinions about them...you might be more tolerable.
Dude, it's just an internet troll. A troll who claims to be the old "Sally Vixxxen" who was outed as a giant troll years ago and basically a card carrying member of the KKK if memory serves correctly. Why do you think the account was banned? Have you seen the racist sh!t that gets posted and allowed to stay up on these boards? That's how much of a troll and how over the top the old account was : too racist even for Letsrun.
I don't know why I seem to be the only person to remember this. Maybe this is some weird Truman show sh!t being played on me idk
I sort of half remember Sally Vixxen...my memory is that she was more of a Rigged angry troll.
This Sally seems different - she seems to actively think she is a wise and generous soul, who thinks Democrats are nuts and cant' see the world straight. I don't think this Sally is a troll like Rigged is obviously a troll. So she drives me a little crazy. Rigged I can deal with - he is a troll. Sally seems to want to do the right thing but has such a low information store that I lose it.
L L wrote:
I'm not sure on all of the dynamics of the Yemen war but Trump vetoing a bipartisan bill is always curious.
Some Republicans are again sending a message that they are not all on board with everything Trump.
Trump's alignment with Saudi Arabia where he has business dealings and who assassinated a journalist for speaking out against them is not a good look for Trump.
Potential emoluments clause issues.
remember it's only a handful of Rs voting bipartisan - the vast, vast majority of votes on the bill in both houses were on party lines. So calling it bipartisan isn't really that meaningful.
agip wrote:
Racket wrote:
Dude, it's just an internet troll. A troll who claims to be the old "Sally Vixxxen" who was outed as a giant troll years ago and basically a card carrying member of the KKK if memory serves correctly. Why do you think the account was banned? Have you seen the racist sh!t that gets posted and allowed to stay up on these boards? That's how much of a troll and how over the top the old account was : too racist even for Letsrun.
I don't know why I seem to be the only person to remember this. Maybe this is some weird Truman show sh!t being played on me idk
I sort of half remember Sally Vixxen...my memory is that she was more of a Rigged angry troll.
This Sally seems different - she seems to actively think she is a wise and generous soul, who thinks Democrats are nuts and cant' see the world straight. I don't think this Sally is a troll like Rigged is obviously a troll. So she drives me a little crazy. Rigged I can deal with - he is a troll. Sally seems to want to do the right thing but has such a low information store that I lose it.
Pretty much been consistently stupid. Here's some greatest hits of that stupid troll including one where he/she/it/whatever claimed Dale Jr was a top 10 NASCAR driver (lol!):
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?board=1&thread=5486854&id=5487106https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5660164&page=1https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5432763https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5473625&page=2https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5445015agip wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Beta O'Dork
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-says-we-cant-have-open-borders-as-she-swipes-at-beto-orourke-far-left-dems"The rebuke comes after O’Rourke told MSNBC last week that would “absolutely” tear down the border wall in El Paso, Texas, if he gets the chance.
.“Absolutely, I'd take the wall down,” O'Rouke said. “Here's what we know: After the Secure Fence Act, we have built 600 miles of wall and fencing on a 2,000 mile border. What that has done is not in any demonstrable way made us safer.”...
you know as well as I do that no major Democrat is running on 'open borders.' Your trolling is embarrassing.
Beto should not have said that and he has not repeated it. It does not mean in any way that he is for open borders.
he is not trolling. he is just an idiot.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
U Dew Know wrote:
You do know that open borders is an entirely different concept than no or reduced border walls, right? I mean, you do have sufficient mental capacity to understand the difference between these two concepts, right?
Oh, and you do know that one Dem candidate trying to score points against another is a different concept than "a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders", right? Your IQ is not too low to understand this, right? Right?
What the heck, I'm feeling generous. I'll give you a mulligan on this one. Would you care to try again?
(or reduced
How about you explain to us how taking down a border wall is somehow better protecting us from Illegals walking over? A reduction in border wall coverage creates an open border.
Beta has a history if spouting leftist talking points on immigration such as:
- voting against legislation to secure southern border.
- open to getting rid of ICE
- open to decriminalize border crossings
Beta is the idiot who eats dirt and feeds turds to his wife. Enough said.
Try again and stick with one handle next time.
Having reading problems? I'll help you out here. Here was the challenge:
"hey do me a favor and link to a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders. Thanks!"
You responded with some tripe about one Democrats campaigning against another who advocates reducing the physical wall - making your response doubly irrelevant (not to call it stupid because that's not how I roll).
Now, would you care to try again? With something that addresses the challenge this time?
"hey do me a favor and link to a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders. Thanks!"