Zero guy wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Not yet.
But if we do this right, everyone will pay zero dollars for power.
Solar is not free then.
Solar has always been free. Nobody has to pay for sunshine.
Zero guy wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Not yet.
But if we do this right, everyone will pay zero dollars for power.
Solar is not free then.
Solar has always been free. Nobody has to pay for sunshine.
Make America Great Again wrote:
Make America for the 1% Only wrote:
There is no evidence that the Trump Tax Cut helped anyone other than the 1% in America. The cut enriched the already rich, who then lavish donations on corrupt Republican politicians.
A truly ignorant tax cut by President Trump.
Why do you attack job creators? When they have more money, they invest it to hire more workers and raise their workers wages. Their consumption increases demand for goods and services, leading to even more job growth and wage increase.
You still believe that lie?
When you give money to wealthy people they do not create jobs. They just hoard the money.
Demand for goods and services create jobs. Demand goes up when ordinary Americans have more money to spend.
Trump aLago wrote:
Trump is making jobs. He keeps raking in a significant portion of the expense of his golf trips to Mara Lago. That keeps her staff busy. He rents out more rooms. And needs more accountants to keep track of his US taxpayer pilfered winnings. So far $95M has been spent by Americans at Trump aLago .
https://trumpgolfcount.com
BTW, Mara Lago will be under water in a few years. Poetic justice.
WTF^n wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
If your bill is only $35 per month you must use very little power. You are officially the greenest guy on this board. Congratulations. But I'm surprised you have enough electricity to post here.
1) I am most likely not "the greenest guy on this board" - whatever that is supposed to mean.
2) Stating that "(you're) surpised that (I) have enough electricity to post here" is very cute rhetoric. Stupid to be sure, but cute.
3) Duly noted that you were unable to address the simple challenge posed.
Now, try not to back up stupid with more stupid. I know that's probably the only direction you know how to go if you think that $50,000 startup costs for a solar power based system is in any way compatible with the notion of "free" energy. But still, try to stop posting stupidity. It makes you look like an idiot and unfortunately provides more political ammo for those who don't give a rat's ass about the environment.
Apparently, you haven't been following my argument.
If you want free power, we have the technology today that will make it happen. It is expensive, but there are many wealthy people who do pay the $50,000 to buy a system that will allow them to go "off grid" and generate their own free power. In the long run, it's far cheaper for them to pay the up front cost than to buy electricity from the power company.
The point is that the technology exists and continues to improve. If we all want to take advantage of this technology, we can pass a Green New Deal that will bring free power to everyone.
All you idiots claiming no crisis at the border are truly idiots. Obama's Homeland Security head Jeh Johnson admits that there is a crisis at the border. Over a million illegals expected to cross the border in the next year. You all are really idiots.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-era-dhs-chief-jeh-johnson-says-us-has-a-crisis-at-the-southern-borderViva la vida loca wrote:
All you idiots claiming no crisis at the border are truly idiots. Obama's Homeland Security head Jeh Johnson admits that there is a crisis at the border. Over a million illegals expected to cross the border in the next year. You all are really idiots.
Viva la vida loca wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-era-dhs-chief-jeh-johnson-says-us-has-a-crisis-at-the-southern-borderViva la vida loca wrote:
All you idiots claiming no crisis at the border are truly idiots. Obama's Homeland Security head Jeh Johnson admits that there is a crisis at the border. Over a million illegals expected to cross the border in the next year. You all are really idiots.
And I suggest that you actually watch the whole interview. Jeh Johnson knows what he is talking about. It's clear the president does not.
Fat hurts wrote:
Viva la vida loca wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-era-dhs-chief-jeh-johnson-says-us-has-a-crisis-at-the-southern-borderAnd I suggest that you actually watch the whole interview. Jeh Johnson knows what he is talking about. It's clear the president does not.
And I suggest that Jeh Johnson knows what he is talking about when he says there is a crisis at the border, and YOU have no clue what you are talking about when you says there is no crisis at the border. What a nonsensical thing for you to say.
Trump is in a crisis alright.
The crisis at the border is a humanitarian one. It’s one we’ve partially brought on ourselves by dragging our feet and arguing over a stupid wall. A wall isn’t stopping thousands of immigrants showing up at points of entry and asking for asylum. The immigration centers on the border are far over capacity. The solution is easy:
1. More space, more beds, etc
2. More immigration judges
3. Speed up the process
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
The crisis at the border is a humanitarian one. It’s one we’ve partially brought on ourselves by dragging our feet and arguing over a stupid wall. A wall isn’t stopping thousands of immigrants showing up at points of entry and asking for asylum. The immigration centers on the border are far over capacity. The solution is easy:
1. More space, more beds, etc
2. More immigration judges
3. Speed up the process
Alan
Are you really this stupid? Jeh Johnson is not talking about any humanitarian crisis. Do you even read the linked article? Oh, you didn't because it doesn't fit your narrative? Please don't be so stupid and have your radical leftist views clog your brain.
Fat hurts wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
1) I am most likely not "the greenest guy on this board" - whatever that is supposed to mean.
2) Stating that "(you're) surpised that (I) have enough electricity to post here" is very cute rhetoric. Stupid to be sure, but cute.
3) Duly noted that you were unable to address the simple challenge posed.
Now, try not to back up stupid with more stupid. I know that's probably the only direction you know how to go if you think that $50,000 startup costs for a solar power based system is in any way compatible with the notion of "free" energy. But still, try to stop posting stupidity. It makes you look like an idiot and unfortunately provides more political ammo for those who don't give a rat's ass about the environment.
Apparently, you haven't been following my argument.
If you want free power, we have the technology today that will make it happen. It is expensive, but there are many wealthy people who do pay the $50,000 to buy a system that will allow them to go "off grid" and generate their own free power. In the long run, it's far cheaper for them to pay the up front cost than to buy electricity from the power company.
The point is that the technology exists and continues to improve. If we all want to take advantage of this technology, we can pass a Green New Deal that will bring free power to everyone.
So it is free once I pay $50K?
If I decide to move, what is the cost of de-installing and re-installing the system?
If I pay $150/month for power, it will only take 27+ years to recoup that cost. I'm sure there would be maintenance or replacement costs along the way as well during those 25+ years.
Crazy.
Clueless in Topeka wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
The crisis at the border is a humanitarian one. It’s one we’ve partially brought on ourselves by dragging our feet and arguing over a stupid wall. A wall isn’t stopping thousands of immigrants showing up at points of entry and asking for asylum. The immigration centers on the border are far over capacity. The solution is easy:
1. More space, more beds, etc
2. More immigration judges
3. Speed up the process
Alan
Are you really this stupid? Jeh Johnson is not talking about any humanitarian crisis. Do you even read the linked article? Oh, you didn't because it doesn't fit your narrative? Please don't be so stupid and have your radical leftist views clog your brain.
Wasn’t commenting on the video.....hence I didn’t quote the post.
I was commenting on the fact that detention centers are 200-300+% over capacity.
So the solution is to either fix the capacity and processing problem....or stop asylum altogether.
What’s your solution?
Alan
Clueless in Topeka wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
The crisis at the border is a humanitarian one. It’s one we’ve partially brought on ourselves by dragging our feet and arguing over a stupid wall. A wall isn’t stopping thousands of immigrants showing up at points of entry and asking for asylum. The immigration centers on the border are far over capacity. The solution is easy:
1. More space, more beds, etc
2. More immigration judges
3. Speed up the process
Alan
Are you really this stupid? Jeh Johnson is not talking about any humanitarian crisis. Do you even read the linked article? Oh, you didn't because it doesn't fit your narrative? Please don't be so stupid and have your radical leftist views clog your brain.
I just watched the video and agree with everything Jeh Johnson said. Do you?
Alan
Also apprehensions were much higher in the early 2000s:
Alan
[/quote]Cohen confessed Trump ordered him to issue the payments to two women who had threatened to go public with allegations they had sex with the president over a decade ago. Cohen has copped to campaign finance crimes stemming from those payoffs and will start serving a three-year prison sentence in May on those and other charges.
Trump is repeatedly referred to as “Individual 1” throughout court papers, and former prosecutors say the the feds could indict the President on the same crimes Cohen copped to as soon as he leaves the White House. Longstanding Justice Department policy prevents prosecutors from indicting sitting presidents.
“The reason I would say it’s the most dangerous case for Trump is because what we already know is very damning,” said Harry Sandick, who served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District for nearly six years, specializing in white collar crimes. "We don’t know what else the government has.”
Pertinently, the statute of limitations for the campaign finance crime runs out in 2021, meaning Trump could be charged if he loses the 2020 election.[/quote]
oopsie...... wrote:
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/03/31/trump-faces-multiple-probes-in-new-york-even-after-mueller/23703321/
Cohen confessed Trump ordered him to issue the payments to two women who had threatened to go public with allegations they had sex with the president over a decade ago. Cohen has copped to campaign finance crimes stemming from those payoffs and will start serving a three-year prison sentence in May on those and other charges.
Trump is repeatedly referred to as “Individual 1” throughout court papers, and former prosecutors say the the feds could indict the President on the same crimes Cohen copped to as soon as he leaves the White House. Longstanding Justice Department policy prevents prosecutors from indicting sitting presidents.
“The reason I would say it’s the most dangerous case for Trump is because what we already know is very damning,” said Harry Sandick, who served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District for nearly six years, specializing in white collar crimes. "We don’t know what else the government has.”
Pertinently, the statute of limitations for the campaign finance crime runs out in 2021, meaning Trump could be charged if he loses the 2020 election.[/quote][/quote]
IF he is allowed to run and IF he is re-elected, they will seal the indictment so that he can still be charged when he leaves office. When he is indicted and convicted of this, this proves CHEATING to win the 2016 election. Just know that Trumpers.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
The Orange One is going to prison.
The crisis at the boarder has been increased by Trump.
People are fleeing to the US to escape bad conditions in Central America. Trump is cutting funds to those countries giving them more reasons to flee here.
Also, Trump is clamping down on legal ports of entries, encouraging asylum seekers to find illegal crossings, putting a bigger strain on boarder patrol.
But this is good for Trump so he can scare people about the illegal crossing that he helped increase.
Obamacare. He is stripping away it’s provisions so he can call it bad and try to campaign on that.
He solves nothing.
Fat hurts wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
1) I am most likely not "the greenest guy on this board" - whatever that is supposed to mean.
2) Stating that "(you're) surpised that (I) have enough electricity to post here" is very cute rhetoric. Stupid to be sure, but cute.
3) Duly noted that you were unable to address the simple challenge posed.
Now, try not to back up stupid with more stupid. I know that's probably the only direction you know how to go if you think that $50,000 startup costs for a solar power based system is in any way compatible with the notion of "free" energy. But still, try to stop posting stupidity. It makes you look like an idiot and unfortunately provides more political ammo for those who don't give a rat's ass about the environment.
Apparently, you haven't been following my argument.
If you want free power, we have the technology today that will make it happen. It is expensive, but there are many wealthy people who do pay the $50,000 to buy a system that will allow them to go "off grid" and generate their own free power. In the long run, it's far cheaper for them to pay the up front cost than to buy electricity from the power company.
The point is that the technology exists and continues to improve. If we all want to take advantage of this technology, we can pass a Green New Deal that will bring free power to everyone.
You seem to be having trouble understanding the English language. Not too surprising - it is quite complex.
Let me help you out with something here.
Definition: Free - Not costing anything.
So, you are trying to say that solar energy is free . . . except for all of the costs involved. That pretty much makes you an idiot. And I definitely do not appreciate you giving real environmentalists a bad name with your spouting of so much idiocy.
Oh yeah, here's another free pointer for you. ALL energy sources are free . . . except for all of the costs involved.
Now please shut up. It is painful to witness someone displaying how much of a moron they are.
Global Warming Warren wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
And I suggest that you actually watch the whole interview. Jeh Johnson knows what he is talking about. It's clear the president does not.
And I suggest that Jeh Johnson knows what he is talking about when he says there is a crisis at the border, and YOU have no clue what you are talking about when you says there is no crisis at the border. What a nonsensical thing for you to say.
I never said there was no crisis at the border.
I have said it's not an emergency and we don't need to build a vanity wall that Mexico won't pay for.
And I'm right.