Summation wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is the evidence: Barr's letter is 4 pages long. Mueller's report is hundreds of pages.
Barr didn't tell the whole story. That is a fact.
How long does the summation need to be before you believe it?
I didn't say I didn't believe it. I said we don't have the full story.
I’m just glad they won’t release the Mueller Report, this way I can continue leaking it.
Mueller Report states that not only is donny a traitor, but most of his family are traitors as well. Hardest part will be to find babysitters for the minor children when they all get arrested.
jesseriley wrote:
I’m just glad they won’t release the Mueller Report, this way I can continue leaking it.
Mueller Report states that not only is donny a traitor, but most of his family are traitors as well. Hardest part will be to find babysitters for the minor children when they all get arrested.
no it doesn't. you're an idiot. how about you and your failed lemming friends learn how to win instead of crying about the excruciating minutiae of every damn thing - yea?
Fat hurts wrote:
Read the text.
The Green New Deal does not even mention nuclear power. And "risky" appears nowhere in the text.
Nuclear power is already being phased out because it is too expensive. Like most clean power advocates, I want to keep our current nuclear capacity going as long as we can. Also, we should invest in research for new, safer nuclear energy.
As for your fear of squandering trillions of dollars, you have no idea about that either. You are just making stuff up.
The Green New Deal got ZERO votes. What are you, stupid?
Summation wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is the evidence: Barr's letter is 4 pages long. Mueller's report is hundreds of pages.
Barr didn't tell the whole story. That is a fact.
How long does the summation need to be before you believe it?
Depends on who is drafting it. If it’s Barr then it can be one page long as long as it contains an Annex with Mueller’s 300+ page report.
Trrher wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I don’t think Barr would outright lie. Regarding collusion I believe Mueller’s report will point out gross negligence by trump and the typical “mob boss doesn’t anything” stance, with obvious intentional procurement of dirt on Hillary by his minions.
Regarding obstruction, the fact is Mueller refused to make a determination which means there is enough to support both sides of the argument but not enough to tip one way or the other. I think on this there will be some very damaging stuff in the report that Trump would hate to be floating out there.
All this did is empower loyal trumpers, but no democrat or independent is going to go over to his side because Mueller did not find enough cause to convict. While this probably strengthens his turnout, it’s a turnout from a pool that hasn’t grown but probably shrunk.
If true. Why no other indictments re: collusion?
IMO it’s safe to say the collusion part is a wrap. That bar was way too high and personally I didn’t that one was going anywhere from the start. Now that doesn’t mean we should again take Barr’s word for it.
Trollminator wrote:
Trrher wrote:
If true. Why no other indictments re: collusion?
IMO it’s safe to say the collusion part is a wrap. That bar was way too high and personally I didn’t that one was going anywhere from the start. Now that doesn’t mean we should again take Barr’s word for it.
FYI: Barr's bar was Trump personally admitting that he "colluded". Barr already knew what the answer would be. In fact, Barr knew the answer when he wrote his memo to Trump which basically asked Trump to give him the DOJ head job.
Summation wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is the evidence: Barr's letter is 4 pages long. Mueller's report is hundreds of pages.
Barr didn't tell the whole story. That is a fact.
How long does the summation need to be before you believe it?
Oh.
My.
What.
Clever.
Rhetorical.
Questions.
You.
Pose!
You are so very, very clever!
Fat hurts wrote:
The Green New Deal does not even mention nuclear power.
It's deliberately absent
Fat hurts wrote:
Nuclear power is already being phased out because it is too expensive.
Uranium is cheap and inexhaustible. To the extent plants are expensive it's because we've chosen not to build them, in part since most Democrats don't support them contrary to the opinion of most scientists.
Fat hurts wrote:
Like most clean power advocates, I want to keep our current nuclear capacity going as long as we can. Also, we should invest in research for new, safer nuclear energy.
I agree
Fat hurts wrote:
As for your fear of squandering trillions of dollars, you have no idea about that either. You are just making stuff up.
Even small taxes and regulations compounded over 100 years will add up to trillions of dollars. This is equally valid as your projections that climate change will cost trillions of dollars of damage, which even if true, the "Green New Deal" won't prevent.
Several problems exist with nuclear ☢️ power. The waste is deadly & there’s never been a sustainable plan to deal with it. Accidents are rare but likewise almost impossible to plan for or rectify. The technology is complex & unforgiving when mistakes are inevitably made. And by the time a plant has a stable & knowledgeable work force, they’re ready to retire; and the process repeats, always with continuous risk of mistakes.
Most of all, the plants need to be placed away from human populations, but that would look suspicious; the plants use a cooling water supply, which acts as a conveyer belt for waste or which becomes steam & disperses airborne waste. The safety logistics are difficult, especially since the whole process has to remain clandestine.
Mueller Report states that trump never cooperated with the investigation & it was impossible to compel answers to Mueller’s questions.
However, trump did offer to cooperate on the bribery charges in exchange for compensation. Trump stated that he would pardon witnesses who stuck by him (funny guy!). And he offered to put a bullet in Mueller if there was a finding of obstruction.
Trump admitted to Mueller that since incompetence was not a crime, he was going to hire the worst lawyer in history as Attorney General, a comment that Barr redacted, ha ha.
Tsarina Sally Vix,
A new low, blaming your mom’s illness for your need to support Putin.
The joke in English is (somewhat difficult to translate), “You kiss your mother with that mouth?”
But go ahead & slander your own mother so you can support fascism. You’re a disgrace.
I think Ghost of Igloi’s excuse is, “I’m too rich to need my country.”
Trollminator wrote:
Kushner has been in hot water for a while but that water is starting to boil now. One example - he goes to Quatar to strike a personal investment deal. They reject him because it’s a $hit real estate debt transaction. He throws a fit and decides to take advantage of the Saudi’s fight with Quatar and next thing you know the Quataris are treated badly at a gulf state summit and the Saudis send some troops to the border to fvck with them. Soon enough and of course mysteriously a Canadian bank strikes a deal with Kushner on the 5th ave property that’s been going down the toilet - with a splendid 99-yr lease and upfront payment, unheard of. He forced Quatar to come through.
Have you contacted the authorities?
Fat hurts wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
With the Green New Deal, we'll squander trillions of dollars (in payments and suppressed economic growth), and it will have negligible impact on the climate.
The Green New Deal actually wants to decrease nuclear power, by far the most practical energy source, because it's "too risky," which is anti-scientific.
Read the text.
The Green New Deal does not even mention nuclear power. And "risky" appears nowhere in the text.
Nuclear power is already being phased out because it is too expensive. Like most clean power advocates, I want to keep our current nuclear capacity going as long as we can. Also, we should invest in research for new, safer nuclear energy.
As for your fear of squandering trillions of dollars, you have no idea about that either. You are just making stuff up.
Dems can’t even get behind the GND. It’s over.
In addition to investigating the hoaxes already talked about I think Trump and Repubs in Congress need to investigate the the greatest scientific hoax ever, also known as Global Warming. Only idiots (and leftist Dems) still believe in Global Warming.
cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Read the text.
The Green New Deal does not even mention nuclear power. And "risky" appears nowhere in the text.
Nuclear power is already being phased out because it is too expensive. Like most clean power advocates, I want to keep our current nuclear capacity going as long as we can. Also, we should invest in research for new, safer nuclear energy.
As for your fear of squandering trillions of dollars, you have no idea about that either. You are just making stuff up.
The Green New Deal got ZERO votes. What are you, stupid?
Climate change will cost trillions of dollars and billions of lives.
We have to fix it.
What are you, stupid?
Hardloper wrote:
Even small taxes and regulations compounded over 100 years will add up to trillions of dollars. This is equally valid as your projections that climate change will cost trillions of dollars of damage, which even if true, the "Green New Deal" won't prevent.
You are dead wrong. And that attitude will kill billions of people. My projections are based on scientific studies. Your projections are stuff you just made up.
We know what has caused global warming and we know how to fix it. All we need is the political will.
Lastly, the fix will cause an economic boom because it includes free energy.
Fat hurts wrote:
cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:
The Green New Deal got ZERO votes. What are you, stupid?
Climate change will cost trillions of dollars and billions of lives.
How so?