Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Barr was appointed by Trump and CONFIRMED by the Senate. 3 Democrats voted to confirm him. Prior to his current job he was held in very high regard by both conservatives and liberals. I would concur that the entire report needs to be seen by Congress. But, it would sure be nice if the Democrats in Congress didn't politicize it.

here's your answer wrote:

This digression made no sense. You sound crazy.

I simply don't believe you want to read a 48-page report by yourself, unless you have some things in mind that you're looking for. It's more likely you want to complain that you can't read it than you actually want to read it.

You don't have to believe it, my friend :)

If 48 pages seems long and impossible to read to you, then I feel bad for you, son.

I really don't need to justify to you why I want the report. Just know I want it.

It’s funny because putin looks weak if trump took his cash & flipped him off. Russians sounded depressed about it, they said sanctions would only get worse.

Sally Vix wrote:

Tax fraud is a very serious crime. Wesley Snipes was sentenced to 4 years of prison for something on a much smaller scale than you are alleging Trump engaged in. You seriously don't think every tax return of Trump has not been gone over with a fine tooth comb? You are alleging Trump engaged in tax fraud and will face the circumstances soon. I will be you $20,000 that Trump will never be convicted of tax fraud. Are you up for that? I can go higher if you want.

1) That is a foolish bet.

2) Betting is low class.

3) Don't go throwing around a $20,000 bet unless you do a couple of things...a) give your real name and address; b) put the $20,000 up in the hands of a neutral party. You are just a poser if you don't do those things.

4) Just go with the low class thing...it really is. You should stay away from that.

L L wrote:

The House fails to override Trump's veto on his national emergency to direct funds to build wall.

That sets a precedent for Bernie Sanders to redirect military funds to expand Medicare for all when he is president.

Idiot Alert---Idiot Alert----Idiot Alert---

Rinse and Repeat

Obama vetoed how many times? Oh, that didn't set a precedent;)

Your bias makes responding so easy.

Obama's wife just did what in Chicago that even has UN-biased (not you) Democrats pissed off.

You need to take a break. You lose far too much and don't know what the word concede means.

Ask your Mentor, Flagpole.

jesseriley wrote:

Barr also concluded Hitler didn’t collude with Russia, “the invasion in 1941 proves it.”

Awe...sweet old man, isn't it your bedtime honey? Your Russian allies will still be there in the morning. Night night.

Fat hurts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

You seriously don't think every tax return of Trump has not been gone over with a fine tooth comb?

I think the IRS does not have the resources to do an exhaustive examination of every return as complex as Tiny's.

Rich people get away with tax fraud all the time.

This is correct. Those who get nailed for tax fraud usually had something else going on in their lives that pointed investigators toward investigating the tax fraud.

Of all the fraud investigations Trump will face, the tax fraud seems to be the least likely to stick. He is more likely to go down for bank and/or wire fraud and insurance fraud, but tax fraud is definitely on the table too.

Betting is not low class, you are because you know you'll lose. If you were confident of winning, you'd bet in a heartbeat.

Give it up, Sally whipped you bigtime.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I think the IRS does not have the resources to do an exhaustive examination of every return as complex as Tiny's.

Rich people get away with tax fraud all the time.

This is correct. Those who get nailed for tax fraud usually had something else going on in their lives that pointed investigators toward investigating the tax fraud.

Of all the fraud investigations Trump will face, the tax fraud seems to be the least likely to stick. He is more likely to go down for bank and/or wire fraud and insurance fraud, but tax fraud is definitely on the table too.

Obama weaponized the IRS and had Lois Lerner going after every conservative group they could. In 2015 why would Obama, knowing that Trump could be president, have his minions meticulously scrutinize every tax return that Trump submitted for the last 30 years? Obama despised Trump and had the means to examine every potential tax fraud that Trump might have committed.

That is a dumb response. Politicians are in the business of politicizing. That is expected on both sides in any country or government type.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

This is correct. Those who get nailed for tax fraud usually had something else going on in their lives that pointed investigators toward investigating the tax fraud.

Of all the fraud investigations Trump will face, the tax fraud seems to be the least likely to stick. He is more likely to go down for bank and/or wire fraud and insurance fraud, but tax fraud is definitely on the table too.

Obama weaponized the IRS and had Lois Lerner going after every conservative group they could. In 2015 why would Obama, knowing that Trump could be president, have his minions meticulously scrutinize every tax return that Trump submitted for the last 30 years? Obama despised Trump and had the means to examine every potential tax fraud that Trump might have committed.

Ok Gary you just gave yourself away with “weaponizing of the IRS”. You can go ahead and vent about Obama having directly harmed you. GTFO flat earther

Plus the tax returns might show several large donations from outside the US.

Sally Vix wrote:

If Bernie Sanders or Beto O'Rourke won the election in 2020, I would certainly not be celebrating but America has always had a dutiful transition from one president to the next, even when half the electorate really despises the winning candidate. I am no John Meacham but the transition has always been smooth and the winning candidate has always been accepted by the losing side. That was UNTIL donald trump won and the left decided to reverse the election. We can't have that. No matter how much you despise the winner, you have to abide by the American system and consider that person the true president.

Even if Trump is eventually fully exonerated yet (we don't know yet), just because a president is being investigated doesn't mean the opposing party was trying to reverse an election; that wouldn't have happened anyway...Hillary would not have been awarded the Presidency. Were Democrats doing that to Nixon? Were Republicans doing that to Bill Clinton? Get serious. Bob Mueller's extensive investigation started because of Trump's actions...firing Comey and then telling Lester Holt that he did so because of that "Russia thing". He only has himself to blame...and it's not over...whether he's just stupid or someone who always wants to fight, it was a BIG mistake for him to fire Comey. He WILL face indictments because of the investigations Mueller spawned, and he WILL go to prison (unless he dies, or the crime or aliens thing). Ridiculous to think that Cohen can be going to prison for something Trump told him to do where Trump is named as Individual-1 and that Trump will be able to stay out of prison.

Flagpole wrote:

3) Don't go throwing around a $20,000 bet unless you do a couple of things...a) give your real name and address; b) put the $20,000 up in the hands of a neutral party. You are just a poser if you don't do those things.

I'll bet 40k. Give me your venmo or paypal info, and I'll give you mine, right here for all to see. Tax fraud conviction ain't happening buddy and u know it

I get that if you're a liberal, you likely think Maddow and other CNN hosts are honest journalistsgood. They're like your friends, have the traits you admire. But they just pulled off a massive scam at your expense & if you believe anything you've been saying, you should be the angriest.

You all eagerly followed Clownpole and fell hook, line & sinker for this whole Russia hoax narrative. You libs have made fools of yourselves.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Barr was appointed by Trump and CONFIRMED by the Senate. 3 Democrats voted to confirm him. Prior to his current job he was held in very high regard by both conservatives and liberals. I would concur that the entire report needs to be seen by Congress. But, it would sure be nice if the Democrats in Congress didn't politicize it.

That is a dumb response. Politicians are in the business of politicizing. That is expected on both sides in any country or government type.

Not always. When Nixon was trying to hang on the Republicans are the ones who tried to do what is best for the country and told him to resign.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Obama weaponized the IRS and had Lois Lerner going after every conservative group they could. In 2015 why would Obama, knowing that Trump could be president, have his minions meticulously scrutinize every tax return that Trump submitted for the last 30 years? Obama despised Trump and had the means to examine every potential tax fraud that Trump might have committed.

Ok Gary you just gave yourself away with “weaponizing of the IRS”. You can go ahead and vent about Obama having directly harmed you. GTFO flat earther

I already have said who I post as ... Sally, Fatty R. Belt Buckle and Polly P. I am not Gary.

L L wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I would not mind Pence. But you can't remove a democratically elected president just because people don't like him.

So if it were found that Trump took money from a foreign campaign contributor, directed that money to Essential Consulting and directed Cohen to pay off women right before the election all the while writing it off as a legal expense and not reporting the outside income at the same time, would that be a good reason to elevate Pence to president?

That's not removing a president because you don't like him.

CORRECT! No one is talking about removing Trump because we don't like him. He's a criminal. If Democrats could just get rid of someone they didn't like, Mitch The Turtle would have been gone a long time ago.

Flagpole wrote:

L L wrote:

So if it were found that Trump took money from a foreign campaign contributor, directed that money to Essential Consulting and directed Cohen to pay off women right before the election all the while writing it off as a legal expense and not reporting the outside income at the same time, would that be a good reason to elevate Pence to president?

That's not removing a president because you don't like him.

CORRECT! No one is talking about removing Trump because we don't like him. He's a criminal. If Democrats could just get rid of someone they didn't like, Mitch The Turtle would have been gone a long time ago.

You THINK he is a criminal. What ever happened to the Presumption of innocence? I think Trump is every bit the slimeball that you do but I am not sure about him being a criminal. You thinking he is a criminal is YOUR opinion. He has never been found guilty of a crime in a courtroom.