Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
And we see once again the level of discussion has dropped.
Is this what "constantly ducking the point" looks like?
No, we have to go to your posts for that.
The point of this thread is "Nadal shows doping".
You haven't made that point yet.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
No, we have to go to your posts for that.
The point of this thread is "Nadal shows doping".
You haven't made that point yet.
To a mind like yours, that point can never be made. No one has ever successfully argued a doping case that you have accepted here.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
They do have cures for your kind of incontinence.
There's none for your disorder though.
That's ok. I'll take mine over yours any time.
Armstronglivs wrote:
To a mind like yours, that point can never be made. No one has ever successfully argued a doping case that you have accepted here.
More relevant to this thread, from a mind like yours, that point can never be made, because you assume too much.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
To a mind like yours, that point can never be made. No one has ever successfully argued a doping case that you have accepted here.
More relevant to this thread, from a mind like yours, that point can never be made, because you assume too much.
As you say in every thread that claims doping.
Armstronglivs wrote:
As you say in every thread that claims doping.
For good reason.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
As you say in every thread that claims doping.
For good reason.
I see that you haven't entirely lost the ability to laugh at yourself.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
There's none for your disorder though.
That's ok. I'll take mine over yours any time.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step. Well done!
Now go clean your slippers.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
That's ok. I'll take mine over yours any time.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step. Well done!
Now go clean your slippers.
Such savage wit. You're a riot. At a party of Neanderthals. I can't wait for your next troglodyte response - because there will be one.
Welcome to the party.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
For good reason.
I see that you haven't entirely lost the ability to laugh at yourself.
More dodging and ducking.
Such savage wit. You're a riot. At a party of Neanderthals. I can't wait for your next troglodyte response - because there will be one.[/quote)
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Welcome to the party.
He always does what he's told. You certainly gave us your best grunt there.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I see that you haven't entirely lost the ability to laugh at yourself.
More dodging and ducking.
Yes, you are.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
More dodging and ducking.
Yes, you are.
Proving yet again, from a mind like yours, that point can never be made.
What's next "I'm rubber and you're glue..."?
Armstronglivs wrote:
Such savage wit. You're a riot. At a party of Neanderthals. I can't wait for your next troglodyte response - because there will be one.[/quote)
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Welcome to the party.
He always does what he's told. You certainly gave us your best grunt there.
Yet you have still failed to show that Nadal shows doping. You're not very good at this despite all the practice you're getting.
Maybe try sticking to that topic instead of circling back to ad hominem? That isn't working either.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Yes, you are.
Proving yet again, from a mind like yours, that point can never be made.
What's next "I'm rubber and you're glue..."?
As I said, and you continue to show, no point can ever be made on this subject that you will accept. You never have accepted a claim of doping made on these boards. Your pretence of being open to persuasion is just that - a pretence.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Such savage wit. You're a riot. At a party of Neanderthals. I can't wait for your next troglodyte response - because there will be one.[/quote)
He always does what he's told. You certainly gave us your best grunt there.
Yet you have still failed to show that Nadal shows doping. You're not very good at this despite all the practice you're getting.
Maybe try sticking to that topic instead of circling back to ad hominem? That isn't working either.
But you never engage in ad hominem attacks. Oh, wait ...
It's all you have.
I never initiate. I merely toy with your flailing efforts to use them somehow as '"evidence".
Rocinante is dead.
Armstronglivs wrote:
As I said, and you continue to show, no point can ever be made on this subject that you will accept. You never have accepted a claim of doping made on these boards. Your pretence of being open to persuasion is just that - a pretence.
Deja vu. In this thread alone, I accepted claims of doping for Eastern women and Chinese women.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
As I said, and you continue to show, no point can ever be made on this subject that you will accept. You never have accepted a claim of doping made on these boards. Your pretence of being open to persuasion is just that - a pretence.
Deja vu. In this thread alone, I accepted claims of doping for Eastern women and Chinese women.
An utterly disingenuous observation. No one has argued on these threads that there was doping in the former E Bloc or in China in the '90's. Those are known facts of life.
You have never accepted an argument here about any individual athlete since that era - especially a distance runner - who hadn't incurred a doping violation. No one in 30-odd years. You're a doping denier - and part of your denial is to deny even that fact. In common parlance it's called being a liar. As you are.