Ciro wrote:
Trump: The Democrats have become an anti-Israel and an anti-Jewish party.
Alt-Right fanboys in chinos and polo shirts: Jews will not replace us
Must be very confusing for those same fan boys.
Those Alt-Righters are in the tank for Tulsi Gabbard now, but that's none of my business.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
One thing I find highly humorous is that Flagpole has already listed out about 20 serious crimes that Trump has committed, any one by itself would be grounds for impeachment. And two of the most anti-Trump committee heads in Congress, Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schitt, both just said yesterday that the evidence is not there yet for impeachment. You would think they would be have access to much more evidence than Flagpole has. But, alas, our beloved Flagpole appears to be privy to much more sensitive evidence than even these two highly influential Congresspeople do.
Flagpole wrote:
SETI wrote:
FW - You better hope aliens are coming or you don't have a chance now.
Or what...a prediction I have made will turn out not to come true? Oh no! How will I ever go on?!
Methinks you are pretty certain of yourself for no reason.
Seems kind of trivial doesn’t it. Not sure why it means so much to you, but for some odd reason it does.
WTF^n wrote:
Snatchpole wrote:
As many have said....here come the Flagpole excuses. Well, they "could" have impeached him. Well, he was impeachable.
No, if they could and had enough, they would. Go back to your hole Flagpole.
I see. So you being incapable of using the English language properly makes me Flagpole?
Logic much?
Simple comprehension is beyond your liberal mind. Stay on the sidelines oh ye of small brain. Still upset over 2016, eh?
Flagpole wrote:
The Fokus wrote:
You are going to have one tough time come release of the report. There's likely to be no charges and rather a listing of evidence for Congress to deal with. The evidence will be spun both ways in the usual fashion and we'll move to the 2020 election with both sides pointing at each other.
I have not said these will all be covered in the Mueller Report. In fact, I have said exactly NOT that.
The financial stuff is most likely going to be handled by the SDNY, AND the New York Attorney General and probably some other office(s) too (as I have said before). Mueller will lay out evidence of obstruction of justice, witness tampering, perjury and suborning perjury. I do not have a clear vision on where the conspiracy stuff will come from. It MIGHT be in the Mueller Report, and it SHOULD be there...either evidence of it or exoneration of it, but it is unclear what exactly he may have farmed out. I am also unclear just now who will handle the Emoluments Clause violations.
Mueller will indict Don Jr. and Kushner for conspiracy. Manafort will face extra prison time for conspiracy. If this comes down while Trump is in office, he may be indicted under seal.
Trump will eventually be indicted either while in office or after he is out of office (likely the latter). He will spend time in prison for his crimes.
I still maintain he will be impeached by the House before the end of his first term and then the Senate will either convict him, or he will resign (unless death, crime, or aliens from space). If I am wrong about anything, it will just be the timing of it all and he will make it to the end of his first term. I have no opinion yet on whether he can actually win again in 2020 if he is eligible.
I have said for well over a year that if he escapes any of the things I laid out it will be due to plea bargain and/or pardon. It will be shown though that he did commit all the things I have laid out and then some, and even with plea bargain and pardon, he will not be able to escape some sort of a prison sentence.
He is in deep sh!t, and he will not walk away unscathed. He will suffer political, legal, and financial losses, the biggest of which may be the RICO charges that will destroy The Trump Organization.
My one concern with regard to all of this (I am not one to typically be concerned about anything) is that Trump will not live long enough to face the music. He's an obese 72 year old. Heart attack or stoke could end it all in an instant. I honestly wish him the best of health. America and the world needs to see video of him losing his office, losing his money, losing his freedom.
Mueller is coming (this of course INCLUDES anything that any office he pawned stuff off on finds, as I have stated many times before).
The clown is done.
TOLD YA SO!!! Now flagpole knows that Trump will not resign and won't be impeached. So noooooow he changes his tune as a safety net and thinks no one noticed.
"I have said for well over a year that if he escapes any of the things I laid out it will be due to plea bargain and/or pardon."
No, you didn't say that for over a year.
"Trump will eventually be indicted either while in office or after he is out of office (likely the latter)."
No, you said he'd be impeached or resign while in Office. Now you're lying and have your Flagpole fall back...well he wasn't impeached and didn't resign, but...while he's out of Office he will be indicted, likely the latter. So now you will say as long as he's out of Office, I'm right as I didn't say "when".
You've lied over and over because you now have come to realize that he's your guarantee of him being impeached or resigning is not going to happen. You're embarrassed for being wrong, again, so now you throw out back peddling statement to save face (it might happen in 10 years, but I still think they'll indict him---so I'm not wrong).
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
then stop your posting and stop your incessant whining sore loser
Sally Vix wrote:
One thing I find highly humorous is that Flagpole has already listed out about 20 serious crimes that Trump has committed, any one by itself would be grounds for impeachment. And two of the most anti-Trump committee heads in Congress, Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schitt, both just said yesterday that the evidence is not there yet for impeachment. You would think they would be have access to much more evidence than Flagpole has. But, alas, our beloved Flagpole appears to be privy to much more sensitive evidence than even these two highly influential Congresspeople do.
Flagpole only knows what the talking heads at MSNBC tell him.
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
We'll miss you until then.
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
Stop being a Flagpole.
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
I think if AOC, Omar, Tlaib, and the other freshman want to impeach Trump. Dems will impeach. They've essentially cut Pelosi's nuts off. She's not in charge like she used to be. Times have changed.
NKOTB wrote:
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
I think if AOC, Omar, Tlaib, and the other freshman want to impeach Trump. Dems will impeach. They've essentially cut Pelosi's nuts off. She's not in charge like she used to be. Times have changed.
You really don’t get the political game do you? It’s all about leverage. Pelosi has been able to maintain control of the party by using new opportunities to her advantage. She was around during Bill’s impeachment broheem. She’s been through it all. Right now she’s holding the newbies on a loose leach. They don’t know it yet, but they are actually being used by her at the moment as attack dogs. Hence why she hasn’t had to come out and be pro-impeachment. You must have lost your mind if you think she doesn’t want Trump gone. The newly elected Dems are far off on the fringes still. It takes a lot of work to cut into the influence of leadership and not to mention big donors. Just a couple of weeks ago Pelosi flexed her muscles for an instant and completely squeezed alpha male trump out of his vanity wall funding. Yep, just like that. You are delusional, just like I would be if I said McConnel lost his touch.
Trollminator wrote:
NKOTB wrote:
I think if AOC, Omar, Tlaib, and the other freshman want to impeach Trump. Dems will impeach. They've essentially cut Pelosi's nuts off. She's not in charge like she used to be. Times have changed.
You really don’t get the political game do you? It’s all about leverage. Pelosi has been able to maintain control of the party by using new opportunities to her advantage. She was around during Bill’s impeachment broheem. She’s been through it all. Right now she’s holding the newbies on a loose leach. They don’t know it yet, but they are actually being used by her at the moment as attack dogs. Hence why she hasn’t had to come out and be pro-impeachment. You must have lost your mind if you think she doesn’t want Trump gone. The newly elected Dems are far off on the fringes still. It takes a lot of work to cut into the influence of leadership and not to mention big donors. Just a couple of weeks ago Pelosi flexed her muscles for an instant and completely squeezed alpha male trump out of his vanity wall funding. Yep, just like that. You are delusional, just like I would be if I said McConnel lost his touch.
Trollminator, you have a handle on how all of this works. I am in agreement with all you said there.
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You really don’t get the political game do you? It’s all about leverage. Pelosi has been able to maintain control of the party by using new opportunities to her advantage. She was around during Bill’s impeachment broheem. She’s been through it all. Right now she’s holding the newbies on a loose leach. They don’t know it yet, but they are actually being used by her at the moment as attack dogs. Hence why she hasn’t had to come out and be pro-impeachment. You must have lost your mind if you think she doesn’t want Trump gone. The newly elected Dems are far off on the fringes still. It takes a lot of work to cut into the influence of leadership and not to mention big donors. Just a couple of weeks ago Pelosi flexed her muscles for an instant and completely squeezed alpha male trump out of his vanity wall funding. Yep, just like that. You are delusional, just like I would be if I said McConnel lost his touch.
Trollminator, you have a handle on how all of this works. I am in agreement with all you said there.
Even the part about leaches?
Trollminator wrote:
NKOTB wrote:
I think if AOC, Omar, Tlaib, and the other freshman want to impeach Trump. Dems will impeach. They've essentially cut Pelosi's nuts off. She's not in charge like she used to be. Times have changed.
You really don’t get the political game do you? It’s all about leverage. Pelosi has been able to maintain control of the party by using new opportunities to her advantage. She was around during Bill’s impeachment broheem. She’s been through it all. Right now she’s holding the newbies on a loose leach. They don’t know it yet, but they are actually being used by her at the moment as attack dogs. Hence why she hasn’t had to come out and be pro-impeachment. You must have lost your mind if you think she doesn’t want Trump gone. The newly elected Dems are far off on the fringes still. It takes a lot of work to cut into the influence of leadership and not to mention big donors. Just a couple of weeks ago Pelosi flexed her muscles for an instant and completely squeezed alpha male trump out of his vanity wall funding. Yep, just like that. You are delusional, just like I would be if I said McConnel lost his touch.
+1
Pelosi has allowed, in fact manipulated, this freshman class to damage the perception of the party and energize Trump's base. It's all part of her master plan. We're all just puppets.
Plusser of Onnes wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You really don’t get the political game do you? It’s all about leverage. Pelosi has been able to maintain control of the party by using new opportunities to her advantage. She was around during Bill’s impeachment broheem. She’s been through it all. Right now she’s holding the newbies on a loose leach. They don’t know it yet, but they are actually being used by her at the moment as attack dogs. Hence why she hasn’t had to come out and be pro-impeachment. You must have lost your mind if you think she doesn’t want Trump gone. The newly elected Dems are far off on the fringes still. It takes a lot of work to cut into the influence of leadership and not to mention big donors. Just a couple of weeks ago Pelosi flexed her muscles for an instant and completely squeezed alpha male trump out of his vanity wall funding. Yep, just like that. You are delusional, just like I would be if I said McConnel lost his touch.
+1
Pelosi has allowed, in fact manipulated, this freshman class to damage the perception of the party and energize Trump's base. It's all part of her master plan. We're all just puppets.
loller
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
Why remove Trump when he is doing such a good job at destroying the GOP?
WTF^n=Peabrain wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
I see. So you being incapable of using the English language properly makes me Flagpole?
Logic much?
Simple comprehension is beyond your liberal mind. Stay on the sidelines oh ye of small brain. Still upset over 2016, eh?
I see. So you are incompetent using the English language and incapable of logic. Time to pull the ace out of your sleeve. "But what about 2016?!?!!"
Live in the past much?
Pookie Washington wrote:
L L wrote:
It looks like Nancy Pelosi isn't interested in impeaching Trump unless there is strong bipartisan support.
Doesn't want to divide the country. As if the country isn't already divided.
So, if the Republicans are in lock step, Trump can do anything he wants without repercussions.
Trump's impeachable actions have already surpassed Nixon and Clinton.
But Trump has managed to move the bar for acceptable behavior so low that he can move on with impunity.
The whole political world has seemed to move on to 2020.
It's only March and 2019 is in the past.
Unless there is a major development, there doesn't seem to be much more to comment on this year.
Even if Nancy Pelosi wanted to impeach him, it doesn't mean he'd be impeached...just that she would NOT start up the "process". If you can't see the difference, you need help. . .
Are you capable of putting together even a single sentence that does not contradict itself? WTF?
Here's a hint for you moron-boy: "If Nancy Pelosi wanted to impeach him" then she WOULD "start up the process."
Are you f'ing retarded?
///
You are awarded zero points and not even God should take mercy on your pathetic soul.