Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Webster Dictoinaryiusski wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Still a serial liar. Still a criminal. Still an a$$hole.

Stop describing Hillary and/or yourself flagpole, it reeks of a stealth gloat.

I voted for Trump and likely will vote for Trump again.

I’d agree that he is a serial liar, criminal, and a-hole, but what he is not, is a liberal, and that’s really all that matters to me (and most of my friends).

HI AGIP!!! wrote:

Seek Flagpole's help if needed. Someone called him a loon, but he's smarter than you![\b]

Not really fair to call agip out here, because I am smarter than everyone.

Since a Democrat is almost certain to win the presidency in 2020, I want the Democrat nominee to be way, way left and liberal.

I'm looking for someone to the left of Bernie Sanders and a young woman with some ethnicity.

If only AOC was 35.

Flagpole is a blowing wrote:

Alan and a couple others have had some disparaging comments to make about Flagpole. Flagpole knows he's 100% wrong on the religion topic as well as a few others. His ego is his enemy, hence he doesn't have many friends off these boards. Insecure to a bizarre level and he loves to deflect every chance he gets. Get used to it. Trump is not resigning and he's not being impeached. Flagpole is starting to realize it now and is making excuses because he lives in little Ohio and believes that he knows best about Washington D.C.

1) I do NOT know I'm wrong about the religion topic. There is no reason to believe that religion as we know it today will still be around for the rest of human existence (unless we are all gone soon). Weird that you appear to know.

2) I am NOT starting to realize that Trump won't resign or be impeached (and removed). Still my prediction that he will resign or be impeached by the House AND convicted by the Senate (unless there are the exceptions I have mentioned many times...aliens, his dying, criminal activity). If he manages to stay in office through his first term, then I will just be wrong about the timing of his comeuppance. Meh. He is going to face the music.

3) You aren't the first to say that I am making excuses, and that's just BS. What excuses? Post them or admit you are wrong. If you say something like "you are only NOW saying x", you'd better do your research first, because I have shown others that they are wrong about stuff like that.

Here's what I posted earlier in March that I still adhere to:

"So, these are my predictions (which I have previously posted in bold below):

Charges will include:

Obstruction of Justice

Money Laundering

Conspiracy (could be bribery instead, but it will be as a result of the non-legal term, in this case, collusion)

Bank and/or wire fraud

Emoluments clause

Campaign finance

RICO

Something with regard to chattels

Privacy and/or hacking and/or computer fraud of some sort

Some other thing we don't know about

Trump has the possibility of escaping some of the above charges due to plea bargain and/or pardon. I have said this for a long time, so Trumpers out there, don't get your panties in a wad...don't make me prove that to you.

Since the time I began believing he WILL face time in prison though, I have believed he WILL serve some jail time even if he has plea deals and a pardon. I believe there will just be too much to plea and pardon away and that he WILL serve some time, even if it is minimal.

I do also predict that he will not make it out of his first term. He will be impeached by the House. He then will either resign or be convicted and removed by the Senate. As I said earlier, being wrong on the timing of it all is most at risk. He will face indictments. He will spend time in jail (again, unless he dies first or there is criminal behavior that prevents it or aliens from space make it not so). I care mostly about justice being served, and I am confident that it will be. I care secondarily about the timing of it all...BUT, I DO care about the timing. The sooner he is removed legally from office, the better our nation will be."

In fact at one point I added some new things -- insurance fraud, perjury, suborning perjury, witness tampering.

So, what excuses? Care to declare that you are WRONG about that?

L L wrote:

Since a Democrat is almost certain to win the presidency in 2020, I want the Democrat nominee to be way, way left and liberal.

I'm looking for someone to the left of Bernie Sanders and a young woman with some ethnicity.

If only AOC was 35.

It doesn't bother you that Occasional Cortex has made so many completely idiotic statements, particularly on economic issues? My favorite is that she actually believes that there's a big pot of money that NYC was going to "give" Amazon. Hilarious. Horrifyingly stupid, but hilarious.

Trump Voter wrote:

Webster Dictoinaryiusski wrote:

Stop describing Hillary and/or yourself flagpole, it reeks of a stealth gloat.

I voted for Trump and likely will vote for Trump again.

I’d agree that he is a serial liar, criminal, and a-hole, but what he is not, is a liberal, and that’s really all that matters to me (and most of my friends).

So, you would rather vote for a guy who lies to you constantly, who has put himself and his wealth above the interests of the country in a very criminal way cozying up to dictators around that world and beholden to the leaders of at least one country, instead of a person who just wants less pollution, gays to be able to live their lives, and who values education and the rule of law.

Nice.

L L wrote:

Since a Democrat is almost certain to win the presidency in 2020, I want the Democrat nominee to be way, way left and liberal.

I'm looking for someone to the left of Bernie Sanders and a young woman with some ethnicity.

If only AOC was 35.

+1

If we are going to have a chance in 2020, we're going to need to go far left.

Old white dudes need to apply (unless you're Bern).

Over the next several weeks, you're going to watch DNC Media struggling to spin, explain away, bury, ignore or outrightly deny and refuse to accept that after a 2 year exhaustive investigation, the Mueller Special Counsel found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russia collusion

All their histrionics won't change a single thing. Mueller didn't find what he didn't find.

Now just as they make the segue to ginning up hysteria over the House investigations by Democrats in Congress, Trump's counter-assault is going to begin.

While Adam Schitt, Jerold Nadler and others are over there wildly waving their empty clenched fists and claiming they have MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE proving Trump crimes, vainly trying to hold the public's attention....

nobody is going to be paying any attention to them.

Trump had to wait until Mueller showed his results. All the drama you are seeing about Mueller's results being HIDDEN from the public are nonsense. Trump and his administration WANT that report released to demonstrate there was no Russia collusion or any other Trump crimes.

What's the BIGGEST, LOUDEST talking point the Democrats & DNC Media & Never Trump would've had if Trump DIDN'T wait until Mueller was finished to launch his counter-offensive against the SpyGate plotters & the Clinton Machine?

"Trump is interfering with and obstructing the Mueller Special Counsel and he's only going after these people to STOP THE EVIDENCE OF HIS COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA and his other crimes from being found and made public!"

They have LOST that talking point.

Lost if FOREVER.

Lost it FOREVER.

THAT is why Trump waited. NOBODY is going to be able to say with a straight face Trump's going after the people who were exposing his Russian collusion.

That talking point narrative is now deader than Elvis.

Mueller looked high Mueller looked low. Mueller looked near. Mueller looked far.

You know he tried. He and his team of 12 Angry Democrats...they tried, folks.

THEY TRIED SO HARD.

You know they did.

And now DNC Media, Democrats and Never Trumpers are trapped.

They just spent TWO YEARS claiming Mueller had the goods.

Stupid people, of course, see no reckoning at all coming for the DNC Media and the Democrats.

Why, they'll just deny everything and sail serenely onward!

BULLSHIT.

BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT.

Because now Trump is going to start COUNTER ATTACKING in earnest.

He held his fire for TWO YEARS just waiting for this moment.

Trump will FORCE the reckoning on them.

They will not be able to avoid it.

When the indictments of SpyGate plotters are unsealed, they HAVE to cover it, they HAVE to talk about it.

"Well Trump's only had McCabe/Comey/Simpson/Steele/Clapper/Brennan/Whoever indicted cuz hey, that person was going to help expose his Russian collusion!" is a dead talking point.

For 2 years DNC Media, Democrats & Never Trump spun hand-waving bullshit based on fake news leaks "Mueller's got the goods on Trump now, folks! It's all over for Trump! Here Comes Mueller! It's Mueller Time soon!"

There never was ANY evidence of Trump/Russia collusion. None.

Guess what? Trump's counter assault now that Mueller's closing shop having found no Russia collusion is NOT - I REPEAT - NOT - GOING TO BE BASED ON HAND WAVING BULLSHIT.

The evidence for SpyGate has been meticulously collected by serious people.

They have it all.

HOROWITZ & HUBER didn't spend the last two years leaking bullshit fake news to ANYBODY.

They spent those two years quietly, exhaustively and meticulously collecting EVIDENCE.

Do you understand the difference?

They took their best shot at Trump, all they had was bullshit hand waving fake news leaks that strung people along for two years before the truth finally comes out when Mueller releases that final report.

Now it'll be Trump's turn, and his people will be presenting EVIDENCE.

OFFICIAL DOJ REPORTS and OFFICIAL DOJ INDICTMENTS will lay out the evidence Horowitz & Huber have been collecting.

These won't be breathless fake news scoops in the NYT's or the Washington Post or Buzzfeed that fall apart after a few days.

And you can quote me on that.

ADDENDUM: "Well the DNC Media will just IGNORE Trump's counter assault!" I'm being told in comments in response to this thread.

Great!

Even if they COULD DO THAT [and I'm not admitting they can] explain HOW THAT STOPS TRUMP & HOROWITZ AND HUBER from doing anything.

Go!

Again people are making the same dumb mistake of thinking this is a PUBLIC RELATIONS battle.

It's not.

James Comey waving a copy of Time Magazine's glowing portrayal of him is not going to save him.

He can chant "BUT THE MEDIA SAYS I'M A SAINT!" all the way to prison.

You're concerned about completely idiotic statements, particularly on economic issues?

We have a president who said he would negotiate the debt down and make a deal.

That means if you had $100,000 in US savings bond he'd get you to agree to make it worth $50,000.00 or so.

Trump thinks a trade deficit means that we owe money to other countries.

He thinks that he imposes a tariff on China that it's China paying taxes to us when it is a tax passed onto the consumers.

He thinks that can make a bilateral deal with every country to benefit the US and has no concept of macroeconomics or the leverage of multi lateral deals.

You are talking about a man who inherited riches and lead multiple bankruptcies.

The only thing he can sell is his name.

AsinineOC wrote:

L L wrote:

Since a Democrat is almost certain to win the presidency in 2020, I want the Democrat nominee to be way, way left and liberal.

I'm looking for someone to the left of Bernie Sanders and a young woman with some ethnicity.

If only AOC was 35.

It doesn't bother you that Occasional Cortex has made so many completely idiotic statements, particularly on economic issues? My favorite is that she actually believes that there's a big pot of money that NYC was going to "give" Amazon. Hilarious. Horrifyingly stupid, but hilarious.

She NEVER said that.

Stop watching Faux News.

Flagpole wrote:

Trump Voter wrote:

I voted for Trump and likely will vote for Trump again.

I’d agree that he is a serial liar, criminal, and a-hole, but what he is not, is a liberal, and that’s really all that matters to me (and most of my friends).

So, you would rather vote for a guy who lies to you constantly, who has put himself and his wealth above the interests of the country in a very criminal way cozying up to dictators around that world and beholden to the leaders of at least one country.

Nice.

Didn't stop you from voting for HRC in 2016.

Has no one pointed out that Clownpole, L L, Trollminator, nontrumper, etc. were getting all excited last week because John Brennan said he expected more indictments on Friday, and nothing happened?

Smells like yet another FLAGPOLE to me. I'll add it to the list of flops.

Nothing seems to be working out for you guys these last few years. Must suck.

Zoe wrote:

AsinineOC wrote:

It doesn't bother you that Occasional Cortex has made so many completely idiotic statements, particularly on economic issues? My favorite is that she actually believes that there's a big pot of money that NYC was going to "give" Amazon. Hilarious. Horrifyingly stupid, but hilarious.

She NEVER said that.

Stop watching Faux News.

Actually, you LIAR, she did. He's DeBlasio and Chuck Todd talking about her stupidity on NBC.

A very stabIe genius! wrote:

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/12/trump-speaks-after-nato-summit-stable-genius-newday-vpx.cnn

Doing great!

Can't wait to see what asinine arguments Flagpole makes this week. It will be tough to top the last two weeks, but I have confidence in him.

This. THIS. So much this.

It's going to be so fun to watch.

AsinineOC wrote:

Zoe wrote:

She NEVER said that.

Stop watching Faux News.

Actually, you LIAR, she did. He's DeBlasio and Chuck Todd talking about her stupidity on NBC.

https://nypost.com/2019/02/17/de-blasio-says-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-didnt-understand-amazon-deal/

Her followers, and most ultra Libs in general, just don't know this stuff occurs because their news feeds don't discuss it. I was actually surprised Todd and DeBlasio focused on it at first. But then you have to keep in mind that the corporate Democrats don't actually want an ultra Liberal, socialist type to actually win; they just want their votes. So they'll keep the ultra Lib hopes up until the very end, and then do the bait and switch (like they did to Bernie voters) and say "ok look, it's too late now, you have to vote for the corporate Dem because the Republican is evil."

Flagpole wrote:

Trump Voter wrote:

I voted for Trump and likely will vote for Trump again.

I’d agree that he is a serial liar, criminal, and a-hole, but what he is not, is a liberal, and that’s really all that matters to me (and most of my friends).

So, you would rather vote for a guy who lies to you constantly, who has put himself and his wealth above the interests of the country in a very criminal way cozying up to dictators around that world and beholden to the leaders of at least one country, instead of a person who just wants less pollution, gays to be able to live their lives, and who values education and the rule of law.

Nice.

So, you voted for a lady who lies to you constantly, who's husband was a former impeached President, put her wealth above the interests of the country (Haiti, Uranium One, Big Banks (research), etc..), cozying up to dictators like Obama did with Putin (see the video), doesn't care about pollution levels, had people harassed if they went against her or her husband (some coincidentally died---just a coincidence)----and stuck her middle finger at the rule of the law. Btw, Gays are doing better than ever, you're just adding to your list of BS.

You basically justified everything that Hillary Clinton did and lied about Trump.

L L wrote:

Since a Democrat is almost certain to win the presidency in 2020, I want the Democrat nominee to be way, way left and liberal.

I'm looking for someone to the left of Bernie Sanders and a young woman with some ethnicity.

If only AOC was 35.

Yep, as certain as HRC was. Don't you feel stupid now?

Flagpole wrote:

1) I do NOT know I'm wrong about the religion topic. There is no reason to believe that religion as we know it today will still be around for the rest of human existence (unless we are all gone soon). Weird that you appear to know.

You may not know you were wrong, but you were certainly shown the significant deficiencies in your thinking on this topic. That is not debatable.